Error rates resulting from anemia can be corrected in multiple commonly used point-of-care glucometers

Elizabeth A. Mann, Jose Salinas, Heather F. Pidcoke, Steven Wolf, John B. Holcomb, Charles E. Wade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A point-of-care (POC) glucometer (G1) used for critical care at our institution is inaccurate in the presence of low hematocrit (HCT) values. The purpose of this study was to analyze error rates of three additional POC glucometer brands and determine mathematical correction formulas for each. METHODS: Blood samples (n = 196) from a cohort of surgical, trauma, medical, cardiothoracic, and burn intensive care unit patients were tested on three commonly used POC glucometer brands (G2-G4). Results were compared with reference laboratory values, and correction compared with the validated formula for G1. A mathematical formula specific to each glucometer type was derived from glucose measurements, associated HCT values, and the degree of difference relative to laboratory results. RESULTS: POC glucometer results were consistently elevated compared with reference laboratory values. Glucometer error rates for HCT ≤ 25% ranged from 15.4% to 22.3% for the three types. Error rates for 25% < HCT < 34% ranged from 16.4% to 18.4%. A correction formula for each glucometer based on the natural log transformation of the HCT predicted reference values with a mean error rate of -0.54% ± 5.6% for G2, -0.6% ± 5.5% for G3, and 0.2% ± 8.0% for G4. Correction was similar to that previously established for G1 (-0.01% ± 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Significant error rates because of HCT effect were found in all glucometer models tested with accurate prediction of reference values with a simple mathematical formula.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-20
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Point-of-Care Systems
Hematocrit
Anemia
Reference Values
Critical Care
Intensive Care Units
Glucose
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Diagnostic accuracy
  • Glucometer error
  • Hematocrit effect
  • Hypoglycemia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Error rates resulting from anemia can be corrected in multiple commonly used point-of-care glucometers. / Mann, Elizabeth A.; Salinas, Jose; Pidcoke, Heather F.; Wolf, Steven; Holcomb, John B.; Wade, Charles E.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.01.2008, p. 15-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mann, Elizabeth A. ; Salinas, Jose ; Pidcoke, Heather F. ; Wolf, Steven ; Holcomb, John B. ; Wade, Charles E. / Error rates resulting from anemia can be corrected in multiple commonly used point-of-care glucometers. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2008 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 15-20.
@article{abaa4d6830d840329001d0c791de0b10,
title = "Error rates resulting from anemia can be corrected in multiple commonly used point-of-care glucometers",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: A point-of-care (POC) glucometer (G1) used for critical care at our institution is inaccurate in the presence of low hematocrit (HCT) values. The purpose of this study was to analyze error rates of three additional POC glucometer brands and determine mathematical correction formulas for each. METHODS: Blood samples (n = 196) from a cohort of surgical, trauma, medical, cardiothoracic, and burn intensive care unit patients were tested on three commonly used POC glucometer brands (G2-G4). Results were compared with reference laboratory values, and correction compared with the validated formula for G1. A mathematical formula specific to each glucometer type was derived from glucose measurements, associated HCT values, and the degree of difference relative to laboratory results. RESULTS: POC glucometer results were consistently elevated compared with reference laboratory values. Glucometer error rates for HCT ≤ 25{\%} ranged from 15.4{\%} to 22.3{\%} for the three types. Error rates for 25{\%} < HCT < 34{\%} ranged from 16.4{\%} to 18.4{\%}. A correction formula for each glucometer based on the natural log transformation of the HCT predicted reference values with a mean error rate of -0.54{\%} ± 5.6{\%} for G2, -0.6{\%} ± 5.5{\%} for G3, and 0.2{\%} ± 8.0{\%} for G4. Correction was similar to that previously established for G1 (-0.01{\%} ± 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Significant error rates because of HCT effect were found in all glucometer models tested with accurate prediction of reference values with a simple mathematical formula.",
keywords = "Diagnostic accuracy, Glucometer error, Hematocrit effect, Hypoglycemia",
author = "Mann, {Elizabeth A.} and Jose Salinas and Pidcoke, {Heather F.} and Steven Wolf and Holcomb, {John B.} and Wade, {Charles E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e318160b9e4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "15--20",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Error rates resulting from anemia can be corrected in multiple commonly used point-of-care glucometers

AU - Mann, Elizabeth A.

AU - Salinas, Jose

AU - Pidcoke, Heather F.

AU - Wolf, Steven

AU - Holcomb, John B.

AU - Wade, Charles E.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: A point-of-care (POC) glucometer (G1) used for critical care at our institution is inaccurate in the presence of low hematocrit (HCT) values. The purpose of this study was to analyze error rates of three additional POC glucometer brands and determine mathematical correction formulas for each. METHODS: Blood samples (n = 196) from a cohort of surgical, trauma, medical, cardiothoracic, and burn intensive care unit patients were tested on three commonly used POC glucometer brands (G2-G4). Results were compared with reference laboratory values, and correction compared with the validated formula for G1. A mathematical formula specific to each glucometer type was derived from glucose measurements, associated HCT values, and the degree of difference relative to laboratory results. RESULTS: POC glucometer results were consistently elevated compared with reference laboratory values. Glucometer error rates for HCT ≤ 25% ranged from 15.4% to 22.3% for the three types. Error rates for 25% < HCT < 34% ranged from 16.4% to 18.4%. A correction formula for each glucometer based on the natural log transformation of the HCT predicted reference values with a mean error rate of -0.54% ± 5.6% for G2, -0.6% ± 5.5% for G3, and 0.2% ± 8.0% for G4. Correction was similar to that previously established for G1 (-0.01% ± 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Significant error rates because of HCT effect were found in all glucometer models tested with accurate prediction of reference values with a simple mathematical formula.

AB - BACKGROUND: A point-of-care (POC) glucometer (G1) used for critical care at our institution is inaccurate in the presence of low hematocrit (HCT) values. The purpose of this study was to analyze error rates of three additional POC glucometer brands and determine mathematical correction formulas for each. METHODS: Blood samples (n = 196) from a cohort of surgical, trauma, medical, cardiothoracic, and burn intensive care unit patients were tested on three commonly used POC glucometer brands (G2-G4). Results were compared with reference laboratory values, and correction compared with the validated formula for G1. A mathematical formula specific to each glucometer type was derived from glucose measurements, associated HCT values, and the degree of difference relative to laboratory results. RESULTS: POC glucometer results were consistently elevated compared with reference laboratory values. Glucometer error rates for HCT ≤ 25% ranged from 15.4% to 22.3% for the three types. Error rates for 25% < HCT < 34% ranged from 16.4% to 18.4%. A correction formula for each glucometer based on the natural log transformation of the HCT predicted reference values with a mean error rate of -0.54% ± 5.6% for G2, -0.6% ± 5.5% for G3, and 0.2% ± 8.0% for G4. Correction was similar to that previously established for G1 (-0.01% ± 4.8). CONCLUSIONS: Significant error rates because of HCT effect were found in all glucometer models tested with accurate prediction of reference values with a simple mathematical formula.

KW - Diagnostic accuracy

KW - Glucometer error

KW - Hematocrit effect

KW - Hypoglycemia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149122251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149122251&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160b9e4

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318160b9e4

M3 - Article

VL - 64

SP - 15

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -