Esperanza Window Traps for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies (Diptera

Simuliidae) in Uganda and Tanzania

Adam Hendy, Vincent Sluydts, Taylor Tushar, Jacobus De Witte, Patrick Odonga, Denis Loum, Michael Nyaraga, Thomson Lakwo, Jean Claude Dujardin, Rory Post, Akili Kalinga, Richard Echodu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is an increasing need to evaluate the impact of chemotherapeutic and vector-based interventions as onchocerciasis affected countries work towards eliminating the disease. The Esperanza Window Trap (EWT) provides a possible alternative to human landing collections (HLCs) for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies, yet it is not known whether current designs will prove effective for onchocerciasis vectors throughout sub-Saharan Africa. EWTs were deployed for 41 days in northern Uganda and south eastern Tanzania where different Simulium damnosum sibling species are responsible for disease transmission. The relative efficacy of EWTs and HLCs was compared, and responses of host-seeking blackflies to odour baits, colours, and yeast-produced CO2were investigated. Blue EWTs baited with CO2and worn socks collected 42.3% (2,393) of the total S. damnosum s.l. catch in northern Uganda. Numbers were comparable with those collected by HLCs (32.1%, 1,817), and higher than those collected on traps baited with CO2and BG-Lure (25.6%, 1,446), a synthetic human attractant. Traps performed less well for the collection of S. damnosum s.l. in Tanzania where HLCs (72.5%, 2,432) consistently outperformed both blue (16.8%, 563) and black (10.7%, 360) traps baited with CO2and worn socks. HLCs (72.3%, 361) also outperformed sock-baited (6.4%, 32) and BG-Lure-baited (21.2%, 106) traps for the collection of anthropophilic Simulium bovis in northern Uganda. Contrasting blackfly distributions were observed on traps in Uganda and Tanzania, indicating differences in behaviour in each area. The success of EWT collections of S. damnosum s.l. in northern Uganda was not replicated in Tanzania, or for the collection of anthropophilic S. bovis. Further research to improve the understanding of behavioural responses of vector sibling species to traps and their attractants should be encouraged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0005688
JournalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume11
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 19 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Simuliidae
Uganda
Tanzania
Diptera
Onchocerciasis
Africa South of the Sahara
Color
Yeasts
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Esperanza Window Traps for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies (Diptera : Simuliidae) in Uganda and Tanzania. / Hendy, Adam; Sluydts, Vincent; Tushar, Taylor; De Witte, Jacobus; Odonga, Patrick; Loum, Denis; Nyaraga, Michael; Lakwo, Thomson; Dujardin, Jean Claude; Post, Rory; Kalinga, Akili; Echodu, Richard.

In: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol. 11, No. 6, e0005688, 19.06.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hendy, A, Sluydts, V, Tushar, T, De Witte, J, Odonga, P, Loum, D, Nyaraga, M, Lakwo, T, Dujardin, JC, Post, R, Kalinga, A & Echodu, R 2017, 'Esperanza Window Traps for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Uganda and Tanzania', PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 11, no. 6, e0005688. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005688
Hendy, Adam ; Sluydts, Vincent ; Tushar, Taylor ; De Witte, Jacobus ; Odonga, Patrick ; Loum, Denis ; Nyaraga, Michael ; Lakwo, Thomson ; Dujardin, Jean Claude ; Post, Rory ; Kalinga, Akili ; Echodu, Richard. / Esperanza Window Traps for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies (Diptera : Simuliidae) in Uganda and Tanzania. In: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2017 ; Vol. 11, No. 6.
@article{1f9555faed9941e3a6efad1d0b89801c,
title = "Esperanza Window Traps for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) in Uganda and Tanzania",
abstract = "There is an increasing need to evaluate the impact of chemotherapeutic and vector-based interventions as onchocerciasis affected countries work towards eliminating the disease. The Esperanza Window Trap (EWT) provides a possible alternative to human landing collections (HLCs) for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies, yet it is not known whether current designs will prove effective for onchocerciasis vectors throughout sub-Saharan Africa. EWTs were deployed for 41 days in northern Uganda and south eastern Tanzania where different Simulium damnosum sibling species are responsible for disease transmission. The relative efficacy of EWTs and HLCs was compared, and responses of host-seeking blackflies to odour baits, colours, and yeast-produced CO2were investigated. Blue EWTs baited with CO2and worn socks collected 42.3{\%} (2,393) of the total S. damnosum s.l. catch in northern Uganda. Numbers were comparable with those collected by HLCs (32.1{\%}, 1,817), and higher than those collected on traps baited with CO2and BG-Lure (25.6{\%}, 1,446), a synthetic human attractant. Traps performed less well for the collection of S. damnosum s.l. in Tanzania where HLCs (72.5{\%}, 2,432) consistently outperformed both blue (16.8{\%}, 563) and black (10.7{\%}, 360) traps baited with CO2and worn socks. HLCs (72.3{\%}, 361) also outperformed sock-baited (6.4{\%}, 32) and BG-Lure-baited (21.2{\%}, 106) traps for the collection of anthropophilic Simulium bovis in northern Uganda. Contrasting blackfly distributions were observed on traps in Uganda and Tanzania, indicating differences in behaviour in each area. The success of EWT collections of S. damnosum s.l. in northern Uganda was not replicated in Tanzania, or for the collection of anthropophilic S. bovis. Further research to improve the understanding of behavioural responses of vector sibling species to traps and their attractants should be encouraged.",
author = "Adam Hendy and Vincent Sluydts and Taylor Tushar and {De Witte}, Jacobus and Patrick Odonga and Denis Loum and Michael Nyaraga and Thomson Lakwo and Dujardin, {Jean Claude} and Rory Post and Akili Kalinga and Richard Echodu",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pntd.0005688",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases",
issn = "1935-2727",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Esperanza Window Traps for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies (Diptera

T2 - Simuliidae) in Uganda and Tanzania

AU - Hendy, Adam

AU - Sluydts, Vincent

AU - Tushar, Taylor

AU - De Witte, Jacobus

AU - Odonga, Patrick

AU - Loum, Denis

AU - Nyaraga, Michael

AU - Lakwo, Thomson

AU - Dujardin, Jean Claude

AU - Post, Rory

AU - Kalinga, Akili

AU - Echodu, Richard

PY - 2017/6/19

Y1 - 2017/6/19

N2 - There is an increasing need to evaluate the impact of chemotherapeutic and vector-based interventions as onchocerciasis affected countries work towards eliminating the disease. The Esperanza Window Trap (EWT) provides a possible alternative to human landing collections (HLCs) for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies, yet it is not known whether current designs will prove effective for onchocerciasis vectors throughout sub-Saharan Africa. EWTs were deployed for 41 days in northern Uganda and south eastern Tanzania where different Simulium damnosum sibling species are responsible for disease transmission. The relative efficacy of EWTs and HLCs was compared, and responses of host-seeking blackflies to odour baits, colours, and yeast-produced CO2were investigated. Blue EWTs baited with CO2and worn socks collected 42.3% (2,393) of the total S. damnosum s.l. catch in northern Uganda. Numbers were comparable with those collected by HLCs (32.1%, 1,817), and higher than those collected on traps baited with CO2and BG-Lure (25.6%, 1,446), a synthetic human attractant. Traps performed less well for the collection of S. damnosum s.l. in Tanzania where HLCs (72.5%, 2,432) consistently outperformed both blue (16.8%, 563) and black (10.7%, 360) traps baited with CO2and worn socks. HLCs (72.3%, 361) also outperformed sock-baited (6.4%, 32) and BG-Lure-baited (21.2%, 106) traps for the collection of anthropophilic Simulium bovis in northern Uganda. Contrasting blackfly distributions were observed on traps in Uganda and Tanzania, indicating differences in behaviour in each area. The success of EWT collections of S. damnosum s.l. in northern Uganda was not replicated in Tanzania, or for the collection of anthropophilic S. bovis. Further research to improve the understanding of behavioural responses of vector sibling species to traps and their attractants should be encouraged.

AB - There is an increasing need to evaluate the impact of chemotherapeutic and vector-based interventions as onchocerciasis affected countries work towards eliminating the disease. The Esperanza Window Trap (EWT) provides a possible alternative to human landing collections (HLCs) for the collection of anthropophilic blackflies, yet it is not known whether current designs will prove effective for onchocerciasis vectors throughout sub-Saharan Africa. EWTs were deployed for 41 days in northern Uganda and south eastern Tanzania where different Simulium damnosum sibling species are responsible for disease transmission. The relative efficacy of EWTs and HLCs was compared, and responses of host-seeking blackflies to odour baits, colours, and yeast-produced CO2were investigated. Blue EWTs baited with CO2and worn socks collected 42.3% (2,393) of the total S. damnosum s.l. catch in northern Uganda. Numbers were comparable with those collected by HLCs (32.1%, 1,817), and higher than those collected on traps baited with CO2and BG-Lure (25.6%, 1,446), a synthetic human attractant. Traps performed less well for the collection of S. damnosum s.l. in Tanzania where HLCs (72.5%, 2,432) consistently outperformed both blue (16.8%, 563) and black (10.7%, 360) traps baited with CO2and worn socks. HLCs (72.3%, 361) also outperformed sock-baited (6.4%, 32) and BG-Lure-baited (21.2%, 106) traps for the collection of anthropophilic Simulium bovis in northern Uganda. Contrasting blackfly distributions were observed on traps in Uganda and Tanzania, indicating differences in behaviour in each area. The success of EWT collections of S. damnosum s.l. in northern Uganda was not replicated in Tanzania, or for the collection of anthropophilic S. bovis. Further research to improve the understanding of behavioural responses of vector sibling species to traps and their attractants should be encouraged.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021627823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021627823&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005688

DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005688

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

JF - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

SN - 1935-2727

IS - 6

M1 - e0005688

ER -