Estimating the value of the World Heritage Site designation: a case study from Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal

Nabin Baral, Sapna Kaul, Joel T. Heinen, Som B. Ale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper estimates the economic value of World Heritage Site (WHS) designation for the Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal. In 2012, entrance fees were $30 per international visitor; lower fees apply to South Asian visitors, and no fees to domestic visitors. We surveyed 522 international visitors to the Park in 2011 to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for access, using the contingent valuation method. Logistic regression results show that bid amounts, gender, age, educational attainment, use of a guide, length of stay in the park, information about park substitutes, and knowledge about the park's WHS designation predicted visitors’ WTP decisions. The median WTP amount was US$90.93 per trip; 63.8% of visitors were willing to pay more than the existing entry fee. The revenue maximizing entry fee was $80 per trip. Knowledge about the park's WHS designation prior to their trip contributed $16.39 to the median WTP: better marketing of the site's WHS status could add up to US$ 566, 619 to the site's annual income. Given that many protected areas now suffer falling public sector financial help, accurate knowledge of WTP is increasingly key to supporting sustainable management in WHS sites, and in justifying tourism to them.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Sustainable Tourism
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

World Heritage Site
willingness to pay
Nepal
national park
fee
Values
educational attainment
contingent valuation
public sector
economic value
marketing
protected area
logistics
gender
tourism
National parks
income
revenue
Tourism
Fees

Keywords

  • Contingent valuation
  • economic value
  • park entry fee
  • visitor management
  • willingness to pay
  • World Heritage Site

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Cite this

Estimating the value of the World Heritage Site designation : a case study from Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal. / Baral, Nabin; Kaul, Sapna; Heinen, Joel T.; Ale, Som B.

In: Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 01.04.2017, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{54e3d0083f404116ae264d609fa18fc4,
title = "Estimating the value of the World Heritage Site designation: a case study from Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal",
abstract = "This paper estimates the economic value of World Heritage Site (WHS) designation for the Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal. In 2012, entrance fees were $30 per international visitor; lower fees apply to South Asian visitors, and no fees to domestic visitors. We surveyed 522 international visitors to the Park in 2011 to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for access, using the contingent valuation method. Logistic regression results show that bid amounts, gender, age, educational attainment, use of a guide, length of stay in the park, information about park substitutes, and knowledge about the park's WHS designation predicted visitors’ WTP decisions. The median WTP amount was US$90.93 per trip; 63.8{\%} of visitors were willing to pay more than the existing entry fee. The revenue maximizing entry fee was $80 per trip. Knowledge about the park's WHS designation prior to their trip contributed $16.39 to the median WTP: better marketing of the site's WHS status could add up to US$ 566, 619 to the site's annual income. Given that many protected areas now suffer falling public sector financial help, accurate knowledge of WTP is increasingly key to supporting sustainable management in WHS sites, and in justifying tourism to them.",
keywords = "Contingent valuation, economic value, park entry fee, visitor management, willingness to pay, World Heritage Site",
author = "Nabin Baral and Sapna Kaul and Heinen, {Joel T.} and Ale, {Som B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09669582.2017.1310866",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Journal of Sustainable Tourism",
issn = "0966-9582",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the value of the World Heritage Site designation

T2 - a case study from Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal

AU - Baral, Nabin

AU - Kaul, Sapna

AU - Heinen, Joel T.

AU - Ale, Som B.

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - This paper estimates the economic value of World Heritage Site (WHS) designation for the Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal. In 2012, entrance fees were $30 per international visitor; lower fees apply to South Asian visitors, and no fees to domestic visitors. We surveyed 522 international visitors to the Park in 2011 to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for access, using the contingent valuation method. Logistic regression results show that bid amounts, gender, age, educational attainment, use of a guide, length of stay in the park, information about park substitutes, and knowledge about the park's WHS designation predicted visitors’ WTP decisions. The median WTP amount was US$90.93 per trip; 63.8% of visitors were willing to pay more than the existing entry fee. The revenue maximizing entry fee was $80 per trip. Knowledge about the park's WHS designation prior to their trip contributed $16.39 to the median WTP: better marketing of the site's WHS status could add up to US$ 566, 619 to the site's annual income. Given that many protected areas now suffer falling public sector financial help, accurate knowledge of WTP is increasingly key to supporting sustainable management in WHS sites, and in justifying tourism to them.

AB - This paper estimates the economic value of World Heritage Site (WHS) designation for the Sagarmatha (Mount Everest) National Park, Nepal. In 2012, entrance fees were $30 per international visitor; lower fees apply to South Asian visitors, and no fees to domestic visitors. We surveyed 522 international visitors to the Park in 2011 to elicit their willingness to pay (WTP) for access, using the contingent valuation method. Logistic regression results show that bid amounts, gender, age, educational attainment, use of a guide, length of stay in the park, information about park substitutes, and knowledge about the park's WHS designation predicted visitors’ WTP decisions. The median WTP amount was US$90.93 per trip; 63.8% of visitors were willing to pay more than the existing entry fee. The revenue maximizing entry fee was $80 per trip. Knowledge about the park's WHS designation prior to their trip contributed $16.39 to the median WTP: better marketing of the site's WHS status could add up to US$ 566, 619 to the site's annual income. Given that many protected areas now suffer falling public sector financial help, accurate knowledge of WTP is increasingly key to supporting sustainable management in WHS sites, and in justifying tourism to them.

KW - Contingent valuation

KW - economic value

KW - park entry fee

KW - visitor management

KW - willingness to pay

KW - World Heritage Site

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017414855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017414855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09669582.2017.1310866

DO - 10.1080/09669582.2017.1310866

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017414855

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Sustainable Tourism

JF - Journal of Sustainable Tourism

SN - 0966-9582

ER -