Ethnic radiographic foot differences

Oscar Castro-Aragon, Santaram Vallurupalli, Meredith Warner, Vinod Panchbhavi, Saul Trevino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of foot and ankle conditions varies among different ethnic groups. It is not known if this difference is due to any distinctive skeletal morphological characteristics of the foot. The purpose of this study was to determine if ethnic differences exist in the morphometric measurements on radiographs of the weightbearing foot. Materials and Methods: A morphometric study of weightbearing radigraphs of feet was performed prospectively. Radiographic parameters were measured on digital monitors using digital tools. These were the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), talonavicular angle (TNA), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCovA), metatarsal span (MS) on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs and talo-first metatarsal angle (T-1stMTA), calcaneal pitch (CP), and lateral talocalcaneal angle (LTCA) on lateral radiographs. Results: A total of 237 feet in 126 patients (45 African Americans, 59 Caucasians, and 22 Hispanics) were studied. Statistically significant differences were found in the CP, LTCA, and MS. African Americans have significantly lower CP than Caucasians (p < 0.0001). African Americans have significantly lower CP than Hispanics (p < 0.0016). Caucasians have significantly higher TCA than African Americans (p < 0. 0004). Males have a larger MS than females (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: There are differences in the radiographic morphology of feet among different ethnic groups. A larger prospective community-based study of morphological differences is needed for better understanding of the genetic and environmental factors influencing the prevalence of foot and ankle conditions. Clinical Relevance: The clinical relevance between having a lower CP angle and a higher incidence of flat feet in African Americans warrants further investigation. It is not known if there is a relationship between posterior tibialis insufficiency and low CP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-61
Number of pages5
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Foot
Metatarsal Bones
African Americans
Weight-Bearing
Hispanic Americans
Ethnic Groups
Ankle
Flatfoot
Hallux Valgus
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Castro-Aragon, O., Vallurupalli, S., Warner, M., Panchbhavi, V., & Trevino, S. (2009). Ethnic radiographic foot differences. Foot and Ankle International, 30(1), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0057

Ethnic radiographic foot differences. / Castro-Aragon, Oscar; Vallurupalli, Santaram; Warner, Meredith; Panchbhavi, Vinod; Trevino, Saul.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 57-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Castro-Aragon, O, Vallurupalli, S, Warner, M, Panchbhavi, V & Trevino, S 2009, 'Ethnic radiographic foot differences', Foot and Ankle International, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 57-61. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0057
Castro-Aragon O, Vallurupalli S, Warner M, Panchbhavi V, Trevino S. Ethnic radiographic foot differences. Foot and Ankle International. 2009 Jan;30(1):57-61. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0057
Castro-Aragon, Oscar ; Vallurupalli, Santaram ; Warner, Meredith ; Panchbhavi, Vinod ; Trevino, Saul. / Ethnic radiographic foot differences. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2009 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 57-61.
@article{e122a38b905e42cfa583746ab32bd2cb,
title = "Ethnic radiographic foot differences",
abstract = "Background: The prevalence of foot and ankle conditions varies among different ethnic groups. It is not known if this difference is due to any distinctive skeletal morphological characteristics of the foot. The purpose of this study was to determine if ethnic differences exist in the morphometric measurements on radiographs of the weightbearing foot. Materials and Methods: A morphometric study of weightbearing radigraphs of feet was performed prospectively. Radiographic parameters were measured on digital monitors using digital tools. These were the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), talonavicular angle (TNA), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCovA), metatarsal span (MS) on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs and talo-first metatarsal angle (T-1stMTA), calcaneal pitch (CP), and lateral talocalcaneal angle (LTCA) on lateral radiographs. Results: A total of 237 feet in 126 patients (45 African Americans, 59 Caucasians, and 22 Hispanics) were studied. Statistically significant differences were found in the CP, LTCA, and MS. African Americans have significantly lower CP than Caucasians (p < 0.0001). African Americans have significantly lower CP than Hispanics (p < 0.0016). Caucasians have significantly higher TCA than African Americans (p < 0. 0004). Males have a larger MS than females (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: There are differences in the radiographic morphology of feet among different ethnic groups. A larger prospective community-based study of morphological differences is needed for better understanding of the genetic and environmental factors influencing the prevalence of foot and ankle conditions. Clinical Relevance: The clinical relevance between having a lower CP angle and a higher incidence of flat feet in African Americans warrants further investigation. It is not known if there is a relationship between posterior tibialis insufficiency and low CP.",
author = "Oscar Castro-Aragon and Santaram Vallurupalli and Meredith Warner and Vinod Panchbhavi and Saul Trevino",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3113/FAI.2009.0057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "57--61",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnic radiographic foot differences

AU - Castro-Aragon, Oscar

AU - Vallurupalli, Santaram

AU - Warner, Meredith

AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod

AU - Trevino, Saul

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Background: The prevalence of foot and ankle conditions varies among different ethnic groups. It is not known if this difference is due to any distinctive skeletal morphological characteristics of the foot. The purpose of this study was to determine if ethnic differences exist in the morphometric measurements on radiographs of the weightbearing foot. Materials and Methods: A morphometric study of weightbearing radigraphs of feet was performed prospectively. Radiographic parameters were measured on digital monitors using digital tools. These were the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), talonavicular angle (TNA), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCovA), metatarsal span (MS) on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs and talo-first metatarsal angle (T-1stMTA), calcaneal pitch (CP), and lateral talocalcaneal angle (LTCA) on lateral radiographs. Results: A total of 237 feet in 126 patients (45 African Americans, 59 Caucasians, and 22 Hispanics) were studied. Statistically significant differences were found in the CP, LTCA, and MS. African Americans have significantly lower CP than Caucasians (p < 0.0001). African Americans have significantly lower CP than Hispanics (p < 0.0016). Caucasians have significantly higher TCA than African Americans (p < 0. 0004). Males have a larger MS than females (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: There are differences in the radiographic morphology of feet among different ethnic groups. A larger prospective community-based study of morphological differences is needed for better understanding of the genetic and environmental factors influencing the prevalence of foot and ankle conditions. Clinical Relevance: The clinical relevance between having a lower CP angle and a higher incidence of flat feet in African Americans warrants further investigation. It is not known if there is a relationship between posterior tibialis insufficiency and low CP.

AB - Background: The prevalence of foot and ankle conditions varies among different ethnic groups. It is not known if this difference is due to any distinctive skeletal morphological characteristics of the foot. The purpose of this study was to determine if ethnic differences exist in the morphometric measurements on radiographs of the weightbearing foot. Materials and Methods: A morphometric study of weightbearing radigraphs of feet was performed prospectively. Radiographic parameters were measured on digital monitors using digital tools. These were the hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), talonavicular angle (TNA), talonavicular coverage angle (TNCovA), metatarsal span (MS) on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs and talo-first metatarsal angle (T-1stMTA), calcaneal pitch (CP), and lateral talocalcaneal angle (LTCA) on lateral radiographs. Results: A total of 237 feet in 126 patients (45 African Americans, 59 Caucasians, and 22 Hispanics) were studied. Statistically significant differences were found in the CP, LTCA, and MS. African Americans have significantly lower CP than Caucasians (p < 0.0001). African Americans have significantly lower CP than Hispanics (p < 0.0016). Caucasians have significantly higher TCA than African Americans (p < 0. 0004). Males have a larger MS than females (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: There are differences in the radiographic morphology of feet among different ethnic groups. A larger prospective community-based study of morphological differences is needed for better understanding of the genetic and environmental factors influencing the prevalence of foot and ankle conditions. Clinical Relevance: The clinical relevance between having a lower CP angle and a higher incidence of flat feet in African Americans warrants further investigation. It is not known if there is a relationship between posterior tibialis insufficiency and low CP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58249119443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58249119443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3113/FAI.2009.0057

DO - 10.3113/FAI.2009.0057

M3 - Article

C2 - 19176187

AN - SCOPUS:58249119443

VL - 30

SP - 57

EP - 61

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 1

ER -