Evaluating health care performance

Strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis

Alai Tan, Jean L. Freeman, Daniel H. Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An increasing number of health services researchers are using multilevel analysis for evaluating health care performance. This method has the distinct advantage of accounting for within-provider correlation among patients. Alternatively, in a similar manner, estimators based on cluster sampling can also adjust for within-provider correlation. Cluster sampling methods do not require assumptions about error distribution as multilevel analysis does. To our knowledge, no comparison has been made between multi-level analysis and cluster sampling estimators in evaluating health care performance using either a simulated or real dataset. In this paper, we compare the cluster sampling estimators to multilevel estimators in evaluating screening mammography performance using Medicare claims data. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis in profiling health care providers with small caseloads.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)707-718
Number of pages12
JournalBiometrical Journal
Volume49
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2007

Fingerprint

Multilevel Analysis
Cluster Sampling
Healthcare
Estimator
Mammography
Health Services
Sampling Methods
Profiling
Screening
Distinct
Multilevel analysis
Sampling

Keywords

  • Cluster sampling
  • Mammography
  • Medicare claims
  • Multilevel analysis
  • Provider profiling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Evaluating health care performance : Strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis. / Tan, Alai; Freeman, Jean L.; Freeman, Daniel H.

In: Biometrical Journal, Vol. 49, No. 5, 08.2007, p. 707-718.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tan, Alai ; Freeman, Jean L. ; Freeman, Daniel H. / Evaluating health care performance : Strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis. In: Biometrical Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 49, No. 5. pp. 707-718.
@article{2f0aa8900b2e46cbb862a6fe2cf43edb,
title = "Evaluating health care performance: Strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis",
abstract = "An increasing number of health services researchers are using multilevel analysis for evaluating health care performance. This method has the distinct advantage of accounting for within-provider correlation among patients. Alternatively, in a similar manner, estimators based on cluster sampling can also adjust for within-provider correlation. Cluster sampling methods do not require assumptions about error distribution as multilevel analysis does. To our knowledge, no comparison has been made between multi-level analysis and cluster sampling estimators in evaluating health care performance using either a simulated or real dataset. In this paper, we compare the cluster sampling estimators to multilevel estimators in evaluating screening mammography performance using Medicare claims data. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis in profiling health care providers with small caseloads.",
keywords = "Cluster sampling, Mammography, Medicare claims, Multilevel analysis, Provider profiling",
author = "Alai Tan and Freeman, {Jean L.} and Freeman, {Daniel H.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1002/bimj.200610350",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "707--718",
journal = "Biometrical Journal",
issn = "0323-3847",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating health care performance

T2 - Strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis

AU - Tan, Alai

AU - Freeman, Jean L.

AU - Freeman, Daniel H.

PY - 2007/8

Y1 - 2007/8

N2 - An increasing number of health services researchers are using multilevel analysis for evaluating health care performance. This method has the distinct advantage of accounting for within-provider correlation among patients. Alternatively, in a similar manner, estimators based on cluster sampling can also adjust for within-provider correlation. Cluster sampling methods do not require assumptions about error distribution as multilevel analysis does. To our knowledge, no comparison has been made between multi-level analysis and cluster sampling estimators in evaluating health care performance using either a simulated or real dataset. In this paper, we compare the cluster sampling estimators to multilevel estimators in evaluating screening mammography performance using Medicare claims data. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis in profiling health care providers with small caseloads.

AB - An increasing number of health services researchers are using multilevel analysis for evaluating health care performance. This method has the distinct advantage of accounting for within-provider correlation among patients. Alternatively, in a similar manner, estimators based on cluster sampling can also adjust for within-provider correlation. Cluster sampling methods do not require assumptions about error distribution as multilevel analysis does. To our knowledge, no comparison has been made between multi-level analysis and cluster sampling estimators in evaluating health care performance using either a simulated or real dataset. In this paper, we compare the cluster sampling estimators to multilevel estimators in evaluating screening mammography performance using Medicare claims data. We also discuss the strengths and limitations of multilevel analysis in profiling health care providers with small caseloads.

KW - Cluster sampling

KW - Mammography

KW - Medicare claims

KW - Multilevel analysis

KW - Provider profiling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448949202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448949202&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bimj.200610350

DO - 10.1002/bimj.200610350

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 707

EP - 718

JO - Biometrical Journal

JF - Biometrical Journal

SN - 0323-3847

IS - 5

ER -