Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure

Osamu Takahashi, Takuro Shimbo, Mahbubur Rahman, Shigeru Okamoto, Yoshifumi Tanaka, Tsuguya Fukui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index, which is calculated by dividing ankle systolic blood pressure by brachial systolic blood pressure, is useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Consensus has not been reached, however, on a standard method for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure. This study evaluated two cuff-wrapping methods for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure, compared with intra-arterial pressure as a gold standard. METHODS: Study participants were 24 consecutive adult patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia at Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital in Japan between January and March 2002. Indirect ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the posterior tibial artery using a Doppler device and two cuff-wrapping methods: spiral, and straight. Direct ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the dorsalis pedis artery. RESULTS: Mean difference in ankle systolic blood pressure between indirect and direct measurements (indirect minus direct) was 1.4 mmHg [standard deviation of the difference (SDd), 17.6 mmHg] with the straight method and -1.4 mmHg (SDd, 22.2 mmHg) with the spiral method. The limit of agreements (mean difference ±2 SDd) and intraclass correlation coefficient between two observers were -17.6 to 20.1 mmHg and 0.94, respectively, for the straight method and -39.4 to 40.0 mmHg and 0.78, respectively, for the spiral method. CONCLUSIONS: The straight method, the same cuff-wrapping method used for measuring brachial blood pressure, appears to represent a more suitable wrapping method because of better interobserver reproducibility. Accuracy and reproducibility of indirect ankle systolic blood pressure measurement, however, were not adequately improved by either of the wrapping methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-26
Number of pages6
JournalBlood Pressure Monitoring
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blood Pressure Determination
Ankle
Blood Pressure
Arm
Tibial Arteries
Ankle Brachial Index

Keywords

  • Blood pressure measurement
  • Doppler ultrasonography
  • Posterior tibial artery
  • Wrapping methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure. / Takahashi, Osamu; Shimbo, Takuro; Rahman, Mahbubur; Okamoto, Shigeru; Tanaka, Yoshifumi; Fukui, Tsuguya.

In: Blood Pressure Monitoring, Vol. 11, No. 1, 02.2006, p. 21-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Takahashi, O, Shimbo, T, Rahman, M, Okamoto, S, Tanaka, Y & Fukui, T 2006, 'Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure', Blood Pressure Monitoring, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mbp.0000189787.67617.0c
Takahashi, Osamu ; Shimbo, Takuro ; Rahman, Mahbubur ; Okamoto, Shigeru ; Tanaka, Yoshifumi ; Fukui, Tsuguya. / Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure. In: Blood Pressure Monitoring. 2006 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 21-26.
@article{9701a3600fa94de3b07f9f8d7445aad9,
title = "Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index, which is calculated by dividing ankle systolic blood pressure by brachial systolic blood pressure, is useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Consensus has not been reached, however, on a standard method for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure. This study evaluated two cuff-wrapping methods for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure, compared with intra-arterial pressure as a gold standard. METHODS: Study participants were 24 consecutive adult patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia at Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital in Japan between January and March 2002. Indirect ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the posterior tibial artery using a Doppler device and two cuff-wrapping methods: spiral, and straight. Direct ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the dorsalis pedis artery. RESULTS: Mean difference in ankle systolic blood pressure between indirect and direct measurements (indirect minus direct) was 1.4 mmHg [standard deviation of the difference (SDd), 17.6 mmHg] with the straight method and -1.4 mmHg (SDd, 22.2 mmHg) with the spiral method. The limit of agreements (mean difference ±2 SDd) and intraclass correlation coefficient between two observers were -17.6 to 20.1 mmHg and 0.94, respectively, for the straight method and -39.4 to 40.0 mmHg and 0.78, respectively, for the spiral method. CONCLUSIONS: The straight method, the same cuff-wrapping method used for measuring brachial blood pressure, appears to represent a more suitable wrapping method because of better interobserver reproducibility. Accuracy and reproducibility of indirect ankle systolic blood pressure measurement, however, were not adequately improved by either of the wrapping methods.",
keywords = "Blood pressure measurement, Doppler ultrasonography, Posterior tibial artery, Wrapping methods",
author = "Osamu Takahashi and Takuro Shimbo and Mahbubur Rahman and Shigeru Okamoto and Yoshifumi Tanaka and Tsuguya Fukui",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/01.mbp.0000189787.67617.0c",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "21--26",
journal = "Blood Pressure Monitoring",
issn = "1359-5237",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of cuff-wrapping methods for the determination of ankle blood pressure

AU - Takahashi, Osamu

AU - Shimbo, Takuro

AU - Rahman, Mahbubur

AU - Okamoto, Shigeru

AU - Tanaka, Yoshifumi

AU - Fukui, Tsuguya

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index, which is calculated by dividing ankle systolic blood pressure by brachial systolic blood pressure, is useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Consensus has not been reached, however, on a standard method for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure. This study evaluated two cuff-wrapping methods for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure, compared with intra-arterial pressure as a gold standard. METHODS: Study participants were 24 consecutive adult patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia at Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital in Japan between January and March 2002. Indirect ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the posterior tibial artery using a Doppler device and two cuff-wrapping methods: spiral, and straight. Direct ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the dorsalis pedis artery. RESULTS: Mean difference in ankle systolic blood pressure between indirect and direct measurements (indirect minus direct) was 1.4 mmHg [standard deviation of the difference (SDd), 17.6 mmHg] with the straight method and -1.4 mmHg (SDd, 22.2 mmHg) with the spiral method. The limit of agreements (mean difference ±2 SDd) and intraclass correlation coefficient between two observers were -17.6 to 20.1 mmHg and 0.94, respectively, for the straight method and -39.4 to 40.0 mmHg and 0.78, respectively, for the spiral method. CONCLUSIONS: The straight method, the same cuff-wrapping method used for measuring brachial blood pressure, appears to represent a more suitable wrapping method because of better interobserver reproducibility. Accuracy and reproducibility of indirect ankle systolic blood pressure measurement, however, were not adequately improved by either of the wrapping methods.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index, which is calculated by dividing ankle systolic blood pressure by brachial systolic blood pressure, is useful in diagnosing peripheral arterial disease. Consensus has not been reached, however, on a standard method for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure. This study evaluated two cuff-wrapping methods for measuring ankle systolic blood pressure, compared with intra-arterial pressure as a gold standard. METHODS: Study participants were 24 consecutive adult patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia at Kyoto Prefectural University Hospital in Japan between January and March 2002. Indirect ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the posterior tibial artery using a Doppler device and two cuff-wrapping methods: spiral, and straight. Direct ankle systolic blood pressure was measured in the dorsalis pedis artery. RESULTS: Mean difference in ankle systolic blood pressure between indirect and direct measurements (indirect minus direct) was 1.4 mmHg [standard deviation of the difference (SDd), 17.6 mmHg] with the straight method and -1.4 mmHg (SDd, 22.2 mmHg) with the spiral method. The limit of agreements (mean difference ±2 SDd) and intraclass correlation coefficient between two observers were -17.6 to 20.1 mmHg and 0.94, respectively, for the straight method and -39.4 to 40.0 mmHg and 0.78, respectively, for the spiral method. CONCLUSIONS: The straight method, the same cuff-wrapping method used for measuring brachial blood pressure, appears to represent a more suitable wrapping method because of better interobserver reproducibility. Accuracy and reproducibility of indirect ankle systolic blood pressure measurement, however, were not adequately improved by either of the wrapping methods.

KW - Blood pressure measurement

KW - Doppler ultrasonography

KW - Posterior tibial artery

KW - Wrapping methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745173516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745173516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.mbp.0000189787.67617.0c

DO - 10.1097/01.mbp.0000189787.67617.0c

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 21

EP - 26

JO - Blood Pressure Monitoring

JF - Blood Pressure Monitoring

SN - 1359-5237

IS - 1

ER -