Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values

Elisa Piva, Laura Sciacovelli, Martina Zaninotto, Michael Laposata, Mario Plebani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Failure to adequately communicate a critical laboratory value is a potential cause of adverse events. Accreditation requirements specify that clinical laboratories must undertake assessments and appropriate measures to improve the timeliness of critical value reporting and prompt receipt by the responsible caregiver. Documentation and communication processes must be regularly monitored and implemented under ongoing systems for quality monitoring. Critical value reporting is an important phase of the clinical laboratory testing process, and notifications of results outside the target time can indicate ineffectiveness of the process. In the present study, we report data obtained in a 12-month period of critical values analysis and describe a computerized communication system conducive to improving the quality of critical value reporting at a university hospital. Automated communication improves the timeliness of notification and avoids the potential errors for which accreditation programs require read-back of the result. The communication also improves the likelihood of reaching the physician on call and may provide important decision support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)432-441
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology
Volume131
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Communication
Accreditation
Documentation
Caregivers
Physicians

Keywords

  • Alerting system
  • Clinical pathology
  • Communication
  • Critical value reporting
  • Errors
  • Information technology
  • Patient safety
  • Short message service

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values. / Piva, Elisa; Sciacovelli, Laura; Zaninotto, Martina; Laposata, Michael; Plebani, Mario.

In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 131, No. 3, 03.2009, p. 432-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Piva, Elisa ; Sciacovelli, Laura ; Zaninotto, Martina ; Laposata, Michael ; Plebani, Mario. / Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values. In: American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2009 ; Vol. 131, No. 3. pp. 432-441.
@article{331a7834e78f4a42ac4d9b94011a86f0,
title = "Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values",
abstract = "Failure to adequately communicate a critical laboratory value is a potential cause of adverse events. Accreditation requirements specify that clinical laboratories must undertake assessments and appropriate measures to improve the timeliness of critical value reporting and prompt receipt by the responsible caregiver. Documentation and communication processes must be regularly monitored and implemented under ongoing systems for quality monitoring. Critical value reporting is an important phase of the clinical laboratory testing process, and notifications of results outside the target time can indicate ineffectiveness of the process. In the present study, we report data obtained in a 12-month period of critical values analysis and describe a computerized communication system conducive to improving the quality of critical value reporting at a university hospital. Automated communication improves the timeliness of notification and avoids the potential errors for which accreditation programs require read-back of the result. The communication also improves the likelihood of reaching the physician on call and may provide important decision support.",
keywords = "Alerting system, Clinical pathology, Communication, Critical value reporting, Errors, Information technology, Patient safety, Short message service",
author = "Elisa Piva and Laura Sciacovelli and Martina Zaninotto and Michael Laposata and Mario Plebani",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1309/AJCPYS80BUCBXTUH",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "131",
pages = "432--441",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of effectiveness of a computerized notification system for reporting critical values

AU - Piva, Elisa

AU - Sciacovelli, Laura

AU - Zaninotto, Martina

AU - Laposata, Michael

AU - Plebani, Mario

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Failure to adequately communicate a critical laboratory value is a potential cause of adverse events. Accreditation requirements specify that clinical laboratories must undertake assessments and appropriate measures to improve the timeliness of critical value reporting and prompt receipt by the responsible caregiver. Documentation and communication processes must be regularly monitored and implemented under ongoing systems for quality monitoring. Critical value reporting is an important phase of the clinical laboratory testing process, and notifications of results outside the target time can indicate ineffectiveness of the process. In the present study, we report data obtained in a 12-month period of critical values analysis and describe a computerized communication system conducive to improving the quality of critical value reporting at a university hospital. Automated communication improves the timeliness of notification and avoids the potential errors for which accreditation programs require read-back of the result. The communication also improves the likelihood of reaching the physician on call and may provide important decision support.

AB - Failure to adequately communicate a critical laboratory value is a potential cause of adverse events. Accreditation requirements specify that clinical laboratories must undertake assessments and appropriate measures to improve the timeliness of critical value reporting and prompt receipt by the responsible caregiver. Documentation and communication processes must be regularly monitored and implemented under ongoing systems for quality monitoring. Critical value reporting is an important phase of the clinical laboratory testing process, and notifications of results outside the target time can indicate ineffectiveness of the process. In the present study, we report data obtained in a 12-month period of critical values analysis and describe a computerized communication system conducive to improving the quality of critical value reporting at a university hospital. Automated communication improves the timeliness of notification and avoids the potential errors for which accreditation programs require read-back of the result. The communication also improves the likelihood of reaching the physician on call and may provide important decision support.

KW - Alerting system

KW - Clinical pathology

KW - Communication

KW - Critical value reporting

KW - Errors

KW - Information technology

KW - Patient safety

KW - Short message service

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62449329438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62449329438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1309/AJCPYS80BUCBXTUH

DO - 10.1309/AJCPYS80BUCBXTUH

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 432

EP - 441

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

IS - 3

ER -