Evaluation of generic medical information accessed via mobile phones at the point of care in resource-limited settings

Hayley Goldbach, Aileen Y. Chang, Andrea Kyer, Dineo Ketshogileng, Lynne Taylor, Amit Chandra, Matthew Dacso, Shiang Ju Kung, Taatske Rijken, Paul Fontelo, Ryan Littman-Quinn, Anne K. Seymour, Carrie L. Kovarik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Many mobile phone resources have been developed to increase access to health education in the developing world, yet few studies have compared these resources or quantified their performance in a resourcelimited setting. This study aims to compare the performance of resident physicians in answering clinical scenarios using PubMed abstracts accessed via the PubMed for Handhelds (PubMed4Hh) website versus medical/drug reference applications (Medical Apps) accessed via software on the mobile phone. Methods A two-arm comparative study with crossover design was conducted. Subjects, who were resident physicians at the University of Botswana, completed eight scenarios, each with multi-part questions. The primary outcome was a grade for each question. The primary independent variable was the intervention arm and other independent variables included residency and question. Results Within each question type there were significant differences in 'percentage correct' between Medical Apps and PubMed4Hh for three of the six types of questions: drug-related, diagnosis/definitions, and treatment/management. Within each of these question types, Medical Apps had a higher percentage of fully correct responses than PubMed4Hh (63% vs 13%, 33% vs 12%, and 41% vs 13%, respectively). PubMed4Hh performed better for epidemiologic questions. Conclusions While mobile access to primary literature remains important and serves an information niche, mobile applications with condensed content may be more appropriate for point-of-care information needs. Further research is required to examine the specific information needs of clinicians in resource-limited settings and to evaluate the appropriateness of current resources in bridging location- and context-specific information gaps.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-42
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Point-of-Care Systems
Cell Phones
PubMed
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Mobile Applications
Botswana
Physicians
Internship and Residency
Health Education
Cross-Over Studies
Software
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Evaluation of generic medical information accessed via mobile phones at the point of care in resource-limited settings. / Goldbach, Hayley; Chang, Aileen Y.; Kyer, Andrea; Ketshogileng, Dineo; Taylor, Lynne; Chandra, Amit; Dacso, Matthew; Kung, Shiang Ju; Rijken, Taatske; Fontelo, Paul; Littman-Quinn, Ryan; Seymour, Anne K.; Kovarik, Carrie L.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 21, No. 1, 2014, p. 37-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goldbach, H, Chang, AY, Kyer, A, Ketshogileng, D, Taylor, L, Chandra, A, Dacso, M, Kung, SJ, Rijken, T, Fontelo, P, Littman-Quinn, R, Seymour, AK & Kovarik, CL 2014, 'Evaluation of generic medical information accessed via mobile phones at the point of care in resource-limited settings', Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001276
Goldbach, Hayley ; Chang, Aileen Y. ; Kyer, Andrea ; Ketshogileng, Dineo ; Taylor, Lynne ; Chandra, Amit ; Dacso, Matthew ; Kung, Shiang Ju ; Rijken, Taatske ; Fontelo, Paul ; Littman-Quinn, Ryan ; Seymour, Anne K. ; Kovarik, Carrie L. / Evaluation of generic medical information accessed via mobile phones at the point of care in resource-limited settings. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 37-42.
@article{e1f13dc403a34ccb8bf1c12dbf69e649,
title = "Evaluation of generic medical information accessed via mobile phones at the point of care in resource-limited settings",
abstract = "Objective Many mobile phone resources have been developed to increase access to health education in the developing world, yet few studies have compared these resources or quantified their performance in a resourcelimited setting. This study aims to compare the performance of resident physicians in answering clinical scenarios using PubMed abstracts accessed via the PubMed for Handhelds (PubMed4Hh) website versus medical/drug reference applications (Medical Apps) accessed via software on the mobile phone. Methods A two-arm comparative study with crossover design was conducted. Subjects, who were resident physicians at the University of Botswana, completed eight scenarios, each with multi-part questions. The primary outcome was a grade for each question. The primary independent variable was the intervention arm and other independent variables included residency and question. Results Within each question type there were significant differences in 'percentage correct' between Medical Apps and PubMed4Hh for three of the six types of questions: drug-related, diagnosis/definitions, and treatment/management. Within each of these question types, Medical Apps had a higher percentage of fully correct responses than PubMed4Hh (63{\%} vs 13{\%}, 33{\%} vs 12{\%}, and 41{\%} vs 13{\%}, respectively). PubMed4Hh performed better for epidemiologic questions. Conclusions While mobile access to primary literature remains important and serves an information niche, mobile applications with condensed content may be more appropriate for point-of-care information needs. Further research is required to examine the specific information needs of clinicians in resource-limited settings and to evaluate the appropriateness of current resources in bridging location- and context-specific information gaps.",
author = "Hayley Goldbach and Chang, {Aileen Y.} and Andrea Kyer and Dineo Ketshogileng and Lynne Taylor and Amit Chandra and Matthew Dacso and Kung, {Shiang Ju} and Taatske Rijken and Paul Fontelo and Ryan Littman-Quinn and Seymour, {Anne K.} and Kovarik, {Carrie L.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001276",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "37--42",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of generic medical information accessed via mobile phones at the point of care in resource-limited settings

AU - Goldbach, Hayley

AU - Chang, Aileen Y.

AU - Kyer, Andrea

AU - Ketshogileng, Dineo

AU - Taylor, Lynne

AU - Chandra, Amit

AU - Dacso, Matthew

AU - Kung, Shiang Ju

AU - Rijken, Taatske

AU - Fontelo, Paul

AU - Littman-Quinn, Ryan

AU - Seymour, Anne K.

AU - Kovarik, Carrie L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objective Many mobile phone resources have been developed to increase access to health education in the developing world, yet few studies have compared these resources or quantified their performance in a resourcelimited setting. This study aims to compare the performance of resident physicians in answering clinical scenarios using PubMed abstracts accessed via the PubMed for Handhelds (PubMed4Hh) website versus medical/drug reference applications (Medical Apps) accessed via software on the mobile phone. Methods A two-arm comparative study with crossover design was conducted. Subjects, who were resident physicians at the University of Botswana, completed eight scenarios, each with multi-part questions. The primary outcome was a grade for each question. The primary independent variable was the intervention arm and other independent variables included residency and question. Results Within each question type there were significant differences in 'percentage correct' between Medical Apps and PubMed4Hh for three of the six types of questions: drug-related, diagnosis/definitions, and treatment/management. Within each of these question types, Medical Apps had a higher percentage of fully correct responses than PubMed4Hh (63% vs 13%, 33% vs 12%, and 41% vs 13%, respectively). PubMed4Hh performed better for epidemiologic questions. Conclusions While mobile access to primary literature remains important and serves an information niche, mobile applications with condensed content may be more appropriate for point-of-care information needs. Further research is required to examine the specific information needs of clinicians in resource-limited settings and to evaluate the appropriateness of current resources in bridging location- and context-specific information gaps.

AB - Objective Many mobile phone resources have been developed to increase access to health education in the developing world, yet few studies have compared these resources or quantified their performance in a resourcelimited setting. This study aims to compare the performance of resident physicians in answering clinical scenarios using PubMed abstracts accessed via the PubMed for Handhelds (PubMed4Hh) website versus medical/drug reference applications (Medical Apps) accessed via software on the mobile phone. Methods A two-arm comparative study with crossover design was conducted. Subjects, who were resident physicians at the University of Botswana, completed eight scenarios, each with multi-part questions. The primary outcome was a grade for each question. The primary independent variable was the intervention arm and other independent variables included residency and question. Results Within each question type there were significant differences in 'percentage correct' between Medical Apps and PubMed4Hh for three of the six types of questions: drug-related, diagnosis/definitions, and treatment/management. Within each of these question types, Medical Apps had a higher percentage of fully correct responses than PubMed4Hh (63% vs 13%, 33% vs 12%, and 41% vs 13%, respectively). PubMed4Hh performed better for epidemiologic questions. Conclusions While mobile access to primary literature remains important and serves an information niche, mobile applications with condensed content may be more appropriate for point-of-care information needs. Further research is required to examine the specific information needs of clinicians in resource-limited settings and to evaluate the appropriateness of current resources in bridging location- and context-specific information gaps.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84890508053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84890508053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001276

DO - 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001276

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 37

EP - 42

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 1

ER -