Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery

Sarah B. Kim, Stephen Williams, Su Chun Cheng, Martin G. Sanda, Andrew A. Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of 2 patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments, Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE), and SF-12, as tools for evaluating HRQOL outcome consequences after renal surgery, and to determine which domains of these HRQOL instruments are most sensitive to HRQOL outcome effects of renal surgery. Methods: Patients completed CARE and SF-12 preoperatively (baseline) and at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. Clinical data, patient response rate, HRQOL changes over time, and likelihood of patient return to baseline HRQOL were evaluated. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Sixty patients completed the baseline and at least 1 follow-up set of questionnaires. The CARE pain, gastrointestinal (GI), and activity domain scores and the SF-12 physical composite score (PCS) were sensitive to changes in HRQOL (all P

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1268-1273
Number of pages6
JournalUrology
Volume79
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Kidney
Pain

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery. / Kim, Sarah B.; Williams, Stephen; Cheng, Su Chun; Sanda, Martin G.; Wagner, Andrew A.

In: Urology, Vol. 79, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1268-1273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Sarah B. ; Williams, Stephen ; Cheng, Su Chun ; Sanda, Martin G. ; Wagner, Andrew A. / Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery. In: Urology. 2012 ; Vol. 79, No. 6. pp. 1268-1273.
@article{2cb6554e58724123ab69a634e2f78fcb,
title = "Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the feasibility of 2 patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments, Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE), and SF-12, as tools for evaluating HRQOL outcome consequences after renal surgery, and to determine which domains of these HRQOL instruments are most sensitive to HRQOL outcome effects of renal surgery. Methods: Patients completed CARE and SF-12 preoperatively (baseline) and at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. Clinical data, patient response rate, HRQOL changes over time, and likelihood of patient return to baseline HRQOL were evaluated. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Sixty patients completed the baseline and at least 1 follow-up set of questionnaires. The CARE pain, gastrointestinal (GI), and activity domain scores and the SF-12 physical composite score (PCS) were sensitive to changes in HRQOL (all P",
author = "Kim, {Sarah B.} and Stephen Williams and Cheng, {Su Chun} and Sanda, {Martin G.} and Wagner, {Andrew A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.047",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1268--1273",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery

AU - Kim, Sarah B.

AU - Williams, Stephen

AU - Cheng, Su Chun

AU - Sanda, Martin G.

AU - Wagner, Andrew A.

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Objective: To assess the feasibility of 2 patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments, Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE), and SF-12, as tools for evaluating HRQOL outcome consequences after renal surgery, and to determine which domains of these HRQOL instruments are most sensitive to HRQOL outcome effects of renal surgery. Methods: Patients completed CARE and SF-12 preoperatively (baseline) and at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. Clinical data, patient response rate, HRQOL changes over time, and likelihood of patient return to baseline HRQOL were evaluated. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Sixty patients completed the baseline and at least 1 follow-up set of questionnaires. The CARE pain, gastrointestinal (GI), and activity domain scores and the SF-12 physical composite score (PCS) were sensitive to changes in HRQOL (all P

AB - Objective: To assess the feasibility of 2 patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) instruments, Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE), and SF-12, as tools for evaluating HRQOL outcome consequences after renal surgery, and to determine which domains of these HRQOL instruments are most sensitive to HRQOL outcome effects of renal surgery. Methods: Patients completed CARE and SF-12 preoperatively (baseline) and at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery. Clinical data, patient response rate, HRQOL changes over time, and likelihood of patient return to baseline HRQOL were evaluated. Results: Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Sixty patients completed the baseline and at least 1 follow-up set of questionnaires. The CARE pain, gastrointestinal (GI), and activity domain scores and the SF-12 physical composite score (PCS) were sensitive to changes in HRQOL (all P

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861733829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861733829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.047

DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.047

M3 - Article

C2 - 22542421

AN - SCOPUS:84861733829

VL - 79

SP - 1268

EP - 1273

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 6

ER -