Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy

A. J. Senagore, C. P. Delaney, H. J. Duepree, K. M. Brady, V. W. Fazio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the actual and predicted risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic colectomy (LAC) calculated using both the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring systems. Methods: All patients who underwent LAC performed by a single surgeon between March 1999 and December 2000 were analysed. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and the observed mortality rate with that predicted by P-POSSUM. The operative severity component of the operative score was sequentially decreased from 4 (standard score for open colectomy) to 2, then 1, in an attempt to correct overprediction. Results: Two hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients underwent LAC, with a conversion rate of 8.0 per cent. The morbidity rate (6.8 per cent) was significantly lower than the predicted rates calculated with an operative score of 4 or 2 (12.4 per cent, P <0.001; 9.6 per cent, P = 0.001), but was fully corrected with an operative score of 1 (7.0 per cent, P = 0.325). The observed mortality rate (0.8 per cent) was significantly different from the expected mortality rates calculated using either unconnected POSSUM (9.6 per cent, P = 0.001) or P-POSSUM (3.5 per cent, P = 0.001). POSSUM (2.6 per cent, P = 0.007) continued to overpredict mortality but P-POSSUM (1.0 per cent, P = 0.001) accurately predicted mortality with an operative score of 1. Conclusion: LAC appeared to be associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates than those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and with a lower mortality rate than that predicted using the P-POSSUM system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1280-1284
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume90
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colectomy
Mortality
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Senagore, A. J., Delaney, C. P., Duepree, H. J., Brady, K. M., & Fazio, V. W. (2003). Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy. British Journal of Surgery, 90(10), 1280-1284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4224

Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy. / Senagore, A. J.; Delaney, C. P.; Duepree, H. J.; Brady, K. M.; Fazio, V. W.

In: British Journal of Surgery, Vol. 90, No. 10, 10.2003, p. 1280-1284.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Senagore, AJ, Delaney, CP, Duepree, HJ, Brady, KM & Fazio, VW 2003, 'Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy', British Journal of Surgery, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1280-1284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4224
Senagore, A. J. ; Delaney, C. P. ; Duepree, H. J. ; Brady, K. M. ; Fazio, V. W. / Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy. In: British Journal of Surgery. 2003 ; Vol. 90, No. 10. pp. 1280-1284.
@article{cedddf40fd724c89938330988e8696a9,
title = "Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the actual and predicted risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic colectomy (LAC) calculated using both the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring systems. Methods: All patients who underwent LAC performed by a single surgeon between March 1999 and December 2000 were analysed. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and the observed mortality rate with that predicted by P-POSSUM. The operative severity component of the operative score was sequentially decreased from 4 (standard score for open colectomy) to 2, then 1, in an attempt to correct overprediction. Results: Two hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients underwent LAC, with a conversion rate of 8.0 per cent. The morbidity rate (6.8 per cent) was significantly lower than the predicted rates calculated with an operative score of 4 or 2 (12.4 per cent, P <0.001; 9.6 per cent, P = 0.001), but was fully corrected with an operative score of 1 (7.0 per cent, P = 0.325). The observed mortality rate (0.8 per cent) was significantly different from the expected mortality rates calculated using either unconnected POSSUM (9.6 per cent, P = 0.001) or P-POSSUM (3.5 per cent, P = 0.001). POSSUM (2.6 per cent, P = 0.007) continued to overpredict mortality but P-POSSUM (1.0 per cent, P = 0.001) accurately predicted mortality with an operative score of 1. Conclusion: LAC appeared to be associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates than those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and with a lower mortality rate than that predicted using the P-POSSUM system.",
author = "Senagore, {A. J.} and Delaney, {C. P.} and Duepree, {H. J.} and Brady, {K. M.} and Fazio, {V. W.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/bjs.4224",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "1280--1284",
journal = "British Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0007-1323",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems in assessing outcome after laparoscopic colectomy

AU - Senagore, A. J.

AU - Delaney, C. P.

AU - Duepree, H. J.

AU - Brady, K. M.

AU - Fazio, V. W.

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the actual and predicted risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic colectomy (LAC) calculated using both the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring systems. Methods: All patients who underwent LAC performed by a single surgeon between March 1999 and December 2000 were analysed. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and the observed mortality rate with that predicted by P-POSSUM. The operative severity component of the operative score was sequentially decreased from 4 (standard score for open colectomy) to 2, then 1, in an attempt to correct overprediction. Results: Two hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients underwent LAC, with a conversion rate of 8.0 per cent. The morbidity rate (6.8 per cent) was significantly lower than the predicted rates calculated with an operative score of 4 or 2 (12.4 per cent, P <0.001; 9.6 per cent, P = 0.001), but was fully corrected with an operative score of 1 (7.0 per cent, P = 0.325). The observed mortality rate (0.8 per cent) was significantly different from the expected mortality rates calculated using either unconnected POSSUM (9.6 per cent, P = 0.001) or P-POSSUM (3.5 per cent, P = 0.001). POSSUM (2.6 per cent, P = 0.007) continued to overpredict mortality but P-POSSUM (1.0 per cent, P = 0.001) accurately predicted mortality with an operative score of 1. Conclusion: LAC appeared to be associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates than those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and with a lower mortality rate than that predicted using the P-POSSUM system.

AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the actual and predicted risk-adjusted morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic colectomy (LAC) calculated using both the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth POSSUM (P-POSSUM) scoring systems. Methods: All patients who underwent LAC performed by a single surgeon between March 1999 and December 2000 were analysed. The observed morbidity and mortality rates were compared with those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and the observed mortality rate with that predicted by P-POSSUM. The operative severity component of the operative score was sequentially decreased from 4 (standard score for open colectomy) to 2, then 1, in an attempt to correct overprediction. Results: Two hundred and fifty-one consecutive patients underwent LAC, with a conversion rate of 8.0 per cent. The morbidity rate (6.8 per cent) was significantly lower than the predicted rates calculated with an operative score of 4 or 2 (12.4 per cent, P <0.001; 9.6 per cent, P = 0.001), but was fully corrected with an operative score of 1 (7.0 per cent, P = 0.325). The observed mortality rate (0.8 per cent) was significantly different from the expected mortality rates calculated using either unconnected POSSUM (9.6 per cent, P = 0.001) or P-POSSUM (3.5 per cent, P = 0.001). POSSUM (2.6 per cent, P = 0.007) continued to overpredict mortality but P-POSSUM (1.0 per cent, P = 0.001) accurately predicted mortality with an operative score of 1. Conclusion: LAC appeared to be associated with lower morbidity and mortality rates than those predicted by the POSSUM scoring system, and with a lower mortality rate than that predicted using the P-POSSUM system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142185021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142185021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bjs.4224

DO - 10.1002/bjs.4224

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 1280

EP - 1284

JO - British Journal of Surgery

JF - British Journal of Surgery

SN - 0007-1323

IS - 10

ER -