Evaluation of Pushrim-Activated Power-Assisted Wheelchairs Using ANSI/RESNA Standards

Amol Karmarkar, Rory A. Cooper, Hsin yi Liu, Sam Connor, Jeremy Puhlman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Karmarkar A, Cooper RA, Liu H, Connor S, Puhlman J. Evaluation of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Objective: To determine and compare performance of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs (PAPAW) (iGLIDE, e-motion, Xtender) on national standards. Design: Engineering performance and safety evaluation. Setting: A Veteran Affairs and university-based research center. Specimens: Nine PAPAWs. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Static, dynamic stability, brake effectiveness, maximum speed, acceleration, retardation, energy consumption, static, impact, and fatigue strength. Results: There was no significant difference among the 3 models in forward stability. The iGLIDE was the most stable, whereas the e-motion was the least stable model in the rearward stability tests. All PAPAWs performed equally on the slopes of 3° and 6° in the forward and rearward directions. Braking distance was the highest for e-motion (5.64±0.28m) and the lowest (1.13±0.03m) for the iGLIDE in forward direction. The average equivalent cycles of all PAPAWs were 318,292±112,776.6 cycles (n=8) on the fatigue tests. All PAPAWs passed the impact and static strength tests. Conclusions: The standards of the American National Standards Institute and the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America could act as quality assurance tool for wheelchairs. The standards for wheelchairs were first approved in 1990; after 17 years, exceeding the minimum values in the standards would be a reasonable expectation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1198
Number of pages8
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume89
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wheelchairs
Fatigue
Self-Help Devices
Veterans
North America
Rehabilitation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Safety
Research

Keywords

  • Quality assurance, health care
  • Rehabilitation
  • Wheelchairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Evaluation of Pushrim-Activated Power-Assisted Wheelchairs Using ANSI/RESNA Standards. / Karmarkar, Amol; Cooper, Rory A.; Liu, Hsin yi; Connor, Sam; Puhlman, Jeremy.

In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 89, No. 6, 06.2008, p. 1191-1198.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karmarkar, Amol ; Cooper, Rory A. ; Liu, Hsin yi ; Connor, Sam ; Puhlman, Jeremy. / Evaluation of Pushrim-Activated Power-Assisted Wheelchairs Using ANSI/RESNA Standards. In: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2008 ; Vol. 89, No. 6. pp. 1191-1198.
@article{1ad823e7c61841768588ed3a8d026951,
title = "Evaluation of Pushrim-Activated Power-Assisted Wheelchairs Using ANSI/RESNA Standards",
abstract = "Karmarkar A, Cooper RA, Liu H, Connor S, Puhlman J. Evaluation of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Objective: To determine and compare performance of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs (PAPAW) (iGLIDE, e-motion, Xtender) on national standards. Design: Engineering performance and safety evaluation. Setting: A Veteran Affairs and university-based research center. Specimens: Nine PAPAWs. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Static, dynamic stability, brake effectiveness, maximum speed, acceleration, retardation, energy consumption, static, impact, and fatigue strength. Results: There was no significant difference among the 3 models in forward stability. The iGLIDE was the most stable, whereas the e-motion was the least stable model in the rearward stability tests. All PAPAWs performed equally on the slopes of 3° and 6° in the forward and rearward directions. Braking distance was the highest for e-motion (5.64±0.28m) and the lowest (1.13±0.03m) for the iGLIDE in forward direction. The average equivalent cycles of all PAPAWs were 318,292±112,776.6 cycles (n=8) on the fatigue tests. All PAPAWs passed the impact and static strength tests. Conclusions: The standards of the American National Standards Institute and the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America could act as quality assurance tool for wheelchairs. The standards for wheelchairs were first approved in 1990; after 17 years, exceeding the minimum values in the standards would be a reasonable expectation.",
keywords = "Quality assurance, health care, Rehabilitation, Wheelchairs",
author = "Amol Karmarkar and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Liu, {Hsin yi} and Sam Connor and Jeremy Puhlman",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "1191--1198",
journal = "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0003-9993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Pushrim-Activated Power-Assisted Wheelchairs Using ANSI/RESNA Standards

AU - Karmarkar, Amol

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Liu, Hsin yi

AU - Connor, Sam

AU - Puhlman, Jeremy

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Karmarkar A, Cooper RA, Liu H, Connor S, Puhlman J. Evaluation of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Objective: To determine and compare performance of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs (PAPAW) (iGLIDE, e-motion, Xtender) on national standards. Design: Engineering performance and safety evaluation. Setting: A Veteran Affairs and university-based research center. Specimens: Nine PAPAWs. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Static, dynamic stability, brake effectiveness, maximum speed, acceleration, retardation, energy consumption, static, impact, and fatigue strength. Results: There was no significant difference among the 3 models in forward stability. The iGLIDE was the most stable, whereas the e-motion was the least stable model in the rearward stability tests. All PAPAWs performed equally on the slopes of 3° and 6° in the forward and rearward directions. Braking distance was the highest for e-motion (5.64±0.28m) and the lowest (1.13±0.03m) for the iGLIDE in forward direction. The average equivalent cycles of all PAPAWs were 318,292±112,776.6 cycles (n=8) on the fatigue tests. All PAPAWs passed the impact and static strength tests. Conclusions: The standards of the American National Standards Institute and the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America could act as quality assurance tool for wheelchairs. The standards for wheelchairs were first approved in 1990; after 17 years, exceeding the minimum values in the standards would be a reasonable expectation.

AB - Karmarkar A, Cooper RA, Liu H, Connor S, Puhlman J. Evaluation of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. Objective: To determine and compare performance of pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs (PAPAW) (iGLIDE, e-motion, Xtender) on national standards. Design: Engineering performance and safety evaluation. Setting: A Veteran Affairs and university-based research center. Specimens: Nine PAPAWs. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Static, dynamic stability, brake effectiveness, maximum speed, acceleration, retardation, energy consumption, static, impact, and fatigue strength. Results: There was no significant difference among the 3 models in forward stability. The iGLIDE was the most stable, whereas the e-motion was the least stable model in the rearward stability tests. All PAPAWs performed equally on the slopes of 3° and 6° in the forward and rearward directions. Braking distance was the highest for e-motion (5.64±0.28m) and the lowest (1.13±0.03m) for the iGLIDE in forward direction. The average equivalent cycles of all PAPAWs were 318,292±112,776.6 cycles (n=8) on the fatigue tests. All PAPAWs passed the impact and static strength tests. Conclusions: The standards of the American National Standards Institute and the Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America could act as quality assurance tool for wheelchairs. The standards for wheelchairs were first approved in 1990; after 17 years, exceeding the minimum values in the standards would be a reasonable expectation.

KW - Quality assurance, health care

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Wheelchairs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43949120427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43949120427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.029

DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.029

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 1191

EP - 1198

JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

SN - 0003-9993

IS - 6

ER -