Evaluation of results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession

Saul Trevino, Mark Gibbs, Vinod Panchbhavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Gastrocnemius recession is traditionally done as an open procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastrocnemius recession performed endoscopically. Methods: The procedure was done in 28 patients (17 men and 11 women), ranging in age from 16 to 72 years (average 47.57, SD 13.86) between January, 2001, and September, 2003. In three patients, the procedure was done bilaterally. Followup ranged from 4 to 36 months (average 22.00, SD 11.84). The procedure was done through a single medial or lateral portal using the 3M Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System (Micro Aire Surgical Instruments, Charlottesville, VA). Results: The initial incision for portal entry was at the wrong level in two of 31 procedures (6.5%), requiring a second incision. The recession could not be accomplished in one of 31 procedures (3.2%), so an open technique was used to complete transection of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis. One patient had a superficial wound infection (3.2%). There was no incidence of sural nerve or Achilles tendon damage. Analysis of results from a modified Olerud and Molander score using a paired student t-test revealed statistically significant improvement (p ≤ 0.05) in pain, stiffness, swelling, and overall average score after the procedure. Conclusion: The results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession using the Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System have been encouraging, with limited morbidity. The technique proved both feasible and safe in this study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-364
Number of pages6
JournalFoot and Ankle International
Volume26
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2005

Fingerprint

Wrist
Sural Nerve
Achilles Tendon
Wound Infection
Surgical Instruments
Retrospective Studies
Students
Morbidity
Safety
Pain
Incidence
Aponeurosis

Keywords

  • Endoscopy
  • Gastrocnemius Contracture
  • Gastrocnemius Recession
  • Sural Nerve

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. / Trevino, Saul; Gibbs, Mark; Panchbhavi, Vinod.

In: Foot and Ankle International, Vol. 26, No. 5, 05.2005, p. 359-364.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trevino, Saul ; Gibbs, Mark ; Panchbhavi, Vinod. / Evaluation of results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. In: Foot and Ankle International. 2005 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 359-364.
@article{a73c49f818a2420cac3ba6a223dbed3d,
title = "Evaluation of results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession",
abstract = "Background: Gastrocnemius recession is traditionally done as an open procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastrocnemius recession performed endoscopically. Methods: The procedure was done in 28 patients (17 men and 11 women), ranging in age from 16 to 72 years (average 47.57, SD 13.86) between January, 2001, and September, 2003. In three patients, the procedure was done bilaterally. Followup ranged from 4 to 36 months (average 22.00, SD 11.84). The procedure was done through a single medial or lateral portal using the 3M Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System (Micro Aire Surgical Instruments, Charlottesville, VA). Results: The initial incision for portal entry was at the wrong level in two of 31 procedures (6.5{\%}), requiring a second incision. The recession could not be accomplished in one of 31 procedures (3.2{\%}), so an open technique was used to complete transection of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis. One patient had a superficial wound infection (3.2{\%}). There was no incidence of sural nerve or Achilles tendon damage. Analysis of results from a modified Olerud and Molander score using a paired student t-test revealed statistically significant improvement (p ≤ 0.05) in pain, stiffness, swelling, and overall average score after the procedure. Conclusion: The results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession using the Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System have been encouraging, with limited morbidity. The technique proved both feasible and safe in this study.",
keywords = "Endoscopy, Gastrocnemius Contracture, Gastrocnemius Recession, Sural Nerve",
author = "Saul Trevino and Mark Gibbs and Vinod Panchbhavi",
year = "2005",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "359--364",
journal = "Foot and Ankle International",
issn = "1071-1007",
publisher = "AOFAS - American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession

AU - Trevino, Saul

AU - Gibbs, Mark

AU - Panchbhavi, Vinod

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - Background: Gastrocnemius recession is traditionally done as an open procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastrocnemius recession performed endoscopically. Methods: The procedure was done in 28 patients (17 men and 11 women), ranging in age from 16 to 72 years (average 47.57, SD 13.86) between January, 2001, and September, 2003. In three patients, the procedure was done bilaterally. Followup ranged from 4 to 36 months (average 22.00, SD 11.84). The procedure was done through a single medial or lateral portal using the 3M Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System (Micro Aire Surgical Instruments, Charlottesville, VA). Results: The initial incision for portal entry was at the wrong level in two of 31 procedures (6.5%), requiring a second incision. The recession could not be accomplished in one of 31 procedures (3.2%), so an open technique was used to complete transection of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis. One patient had a superficial wound infection (3.2%). There was no incidence of sural nerve or Achilles tendon damage. Analysis of results from a modified Olerud and Molander score using a paired student t-test revealed statistically significant improvement (p ≤ 0.05) in pain, stiffness, swelling, and overall average score after the procedure. Conclusion: The results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession using the Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System have been encouraging, with limited morbidity. The technique proved both feasible and safe in this study.

AB - Background: Gastrocnemius recession is traditionally done as an open procedure. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastrocnemius recession performed endoscopically. Methods: The procedure was done in 28 patients (17 men and 11 women), ranging in age from 16 to 72 years (average 47.57, SD 13.86) between January, 2001, and September, 2003. In three patients, the procedure was done bilaterally. Followup ranged from 4 to 36 months (average 22.00, SD 11.84). The procedure was done through a single medial or lateral portal using the 3M Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System (Micro Aire Surgical Instruments, Charlottesville, VA). Results: The initial incision for portal entry was at the wrong level in two of 31 procedures (6.5%), requiring a second incision. The recession could not be accomplished in one of 31 procedures (3.2%), so an open technique was used to complete transection of the gastrocnemius aponeurosis. One patient had a superficial wound infection (3.2%). There was no incidence of sural nerve or Achilles tendon damage. Analysis of results from a modified Olerud and Molander score using a paired student t-test revealed statistically significant improvement (p ≤ 0.05) in pain, stiffness, swelling, and overall average score after the procedure. Conclusion: The results of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession using the Agee Carpal Tunnel Release System have been encouraging, with limited morbidity. The technique proved both feasible and safe in this study.

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Gastrocnemius Contracture

KW - Gastrocnemius Recession

KW - Sural Nerve

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18244366866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18244366866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15913518

AN - SCOPUS:18244366866

VL - 26

SP - 359

EP - 364

JO - Foot and Ankle International

JF - Foot and Ankle International

SN - 1071-1007

IS - 5

ER -