Evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase: Spurious blank ALT activity due to contamination of D-alanine with L-alanine, and recommendations for a correction

Anthony Okorodudu, P. R. Pelletier, A. A. Valcour, G. N. Bowers, R. B. McComb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During an evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase (ALT, EC 2.6.1.2), we noted that the specimen blank activity reaction was markedly increased. Experience with five different lots of D-alanine from four commercial sources indicated that substantial and varying negative bias (up to -10%) could be introduced into the blank-corrected ALT activity, depending on the lot of D-alanine used. Although the IFCC procedure for ALT mentions the possibility of this L-alanine contamination, we believe that the degree of contamination in commercial reagents is underestimated. Analyzing the five lots of D-alanine for L-alanine, we found the magnitude of negative bias to be correlated directly with L-alanine contamination. Here, we describe a quick, sensitive assay based on coupled reactions of L-amino acid oxidase/peroxidase for quantifying L-alanine in the concentration range of 0-15 mmol/L without a sample-dilution step. Results by this alternative L-alanine assay agreed well with those recommended in the IFCC ALT procedure. Further examination suggested an even simpler solution to the L-alanine contamination problem, because we found no difference in the blank-corrected ALT activity determined in Tris HCl buffer, with or without D-alanine (free of L-alanine). We therefore propose that D-alanine be omitted from the IFCC reference ALT procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-156
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Chemistry
Volume35
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Alanine Transaminase
Alanine
Contamination
Assays
L-Amino Acid Oxidase
Tromethamine
Peroxidase
Dilution
Buffers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase : Spurious blank ALT activity due to contamination of D-alanine with L-alanine, and recommendations for a correction. / Okorodudu, Anthony; Pelletier, P. R.; Valcour, A. A.; Bowers, G. N.; McComb, R. B.

In: Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1989, p. 153-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{77b8b549f150497e81850c5181fbf628,
title = "Evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase: Spurious blank ALT activity due to contamination of D-alanine with L-alanine, and recommendations for a correction",
abstract = "During an evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase (ALT, EC 2.6.1.2), we noted that the specimen blank activity reaction was markedly increased. Experience with five different lots of D-alanine from four commercial sources indicated that substantial and varying negative bias (up to -10{\%}) could be introduced into the blank-corrected ALT activity, depending on the lot of D-alanine used. Although the IFCC procedure for ALT mentions the possibility of this L-alanine contamination, we believe that the degree of contamination in commercial reagents is underestimated. Analyzing the five lots of D-alanine for L-alanine, we found the magnitude of negative bias to be correlated directly with L-alanine contamination. Here, we describe a quick, sensitive assay based on coupled reactions of L-amino acid oxidase/peroxidase for quantifying L-alanine in the concentration range of 0-15 mmol/L without a sample-dilution step. Results by this alternative L-alanine assay agreed well with those recommended in the IFCC ALT procedure. Further examination suggested an even simpler solution to the L-alanine contamination problem, because we found no difference in the blank-corrected ALT activity determined in Tris HCl buffer, with or without D-alanine (free of L-alanine). We therefore propose that D-alanine be omitted from the IFCC reference ALT procedure.",
author = "Anthony Okorodudu and Pelletier, {P. R.} and Valcour, {A. A.} and Bowers, {G. N.} and McComb, {R. B.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "153--156",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry",
issn = "0009-9147",
publisher = "American Association for Clinical Chemistry Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase

T2 - Spurious blank ALT activity due to contamination of D-alanine with L-alanine, and recommendations for a correction

AU - Okorodudu, Anthony

AU - Pelletier, P. R.

AU - Valcour, A. A.

AU - Bowers, G. N.

AU - McComb, R. B.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - During an evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase (ALT, EC 2.6.1.2), we noted that the specimen blank activity reaction was markedly increased. Experience with five different lots of D-alanine from four commercial sources indicated that substantial and varying negative bias (up to -10%) could be introduced into the blank-corrected ALT activity, depending on the lot of D-alanine used. Although the IFCC procedure for ALT mentions the possibility of this L-alanine contamination, we believe that the degree of contamination in commercial reagents is underestimated. Analyzing the five lots of D-alanine for L-alanine, we found the magnitude of negative bias to be correlated directly with L-alanine contamination. Here, we describe a quick, sensitive assay based on coupled reactions of L-amino acid oxidase/peroxidase for quantifying L-alanine in the concentration range of 0-15 mmol/L without a sample-dilution step. Results by this alternative L-alanine assay agreed well with those recommended in the IFCC ALT procedure. Further examination suggested an even simpler solution to the L-alanine contamination problem, because we found no difference in the blank-corrected ALT activity determined in Tris HCl buffer, with or without D-alanine (free of L-alanine). We therefore propose that D-alanine be omitted from the IFCC reference ALT procedure.

AB - During an evaluation of the IFCC reference method for alanine aminotransferase (ALT, EC 2.6.1.2), we noted that the specimen blank activity reaction was markedly increased. Experience with five different lots of D-alanine from four commercial sources indicated that substantial and varying negative bias (up to -10%) could be introduced into the blank-corrected ALT activity, depending on the lot of D-alanine used. Although the IFCC procedure for ALT mentions the possibility of this L-alanine contamination, we believe that the degree of contamination in commercial reagents is underestimated. Analyzing the five lots of D-alanine for L-alanine, we found the magnitude of negative bias to be correlated directly with L-alanine contamination. Here, we describe a quick, sensitive assay based on coupled reactions of L-amino acid oxidase/peroxidase for quantifying L-alanine in the concentration range of 0-15 mmol/L without a sample-dilution step. Results by this alternative L-alanine assay agreed well with those recommended in the IFCC ALT procedure. Further examination suggested an even simpler solution to the L-alanine contamination problem, because we found no difference in the blank-corrected ALT activity determined in Tris HCl buffer, with or without D-alanine (free of L-alanine). We therefore propose that D-alanine be omitted from the IFCC reference ALT procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024558750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024558750&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2910558

AN - SCOPUS:0024558750

VL - 35

SP - 153

EP - 156

JO - Clinical Chemistry

JF - Clinical Chemistry

SN - 0009-9147

IS - 1

ER -