Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects

R. T. Scott, Russell Snyder, J. W. Bagnall, K. D. Reed, C. F. Adair, S. D. Hensley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the magnitude of intraobserver variation in dating endometrial biopsies and its impact on clinical management. Design: Blinded histopathologic interpretation of endometrial biopsy specimens 1 year apart by five pathologists. Setting: Large military tertiary care center. Patients: Endometrial biopsy specimens from 51 patients undergoing evaluation for potential luteal phase defects. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Calculation of the magnitude of the individual and overall intraobserver variation in endometrial dating for the five pathologists and estimation of its potential impact on clinical management. Results: The intraobserver variation was 0.69 ± 0.05 days (means ± SE). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the variation for 1-day or 2-day dating ranges. The theoretical probability of altering clinical management by having the same pathologist redate a given specimen ranged from 15% to 28%. Conclusion: Histologic dating of endometrial biopsies is subject to a small but highly clinically significant intraobserver variability that may have a major impact on clinical management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)652-657
Number of pages6
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume60
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Luteal Phase
Biopsy
Tertiary Care Centers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Pathologists

Keywords

  • endometrium
  • histology
  • Luteal phase defect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Scott, R. T., Snyder, R., Bagnall, J. W., Reed, K. D., Adair, C. F., & Hensley, S. D. (1993). Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. Fertility and Sterility, 60(4), 652-657.

Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. / Scott, R. T.; Snyder, Russell; Bagnall, J. W.; Reed, K. D.; Adair, C. F.; Hensley, S. D.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 60, No. 4, 1993, p. 652-657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Scott, R. T. ; Snyder, Russell ; Bagnall, J. W. ; Reed, K. D. ; Adair, C. F. ; Hensley, S. D. / Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. In: Fertility and Sterility. 1993 ; Vol. 60, No. 4. pp. 652-657.
@article{27158f83f01948b99d5d440779452613,
title = "Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the magnitude of intraobserver variation in dating endometrial biopsies and its impact on clinical management. Design: Blinded histopathologic interpretation of endometrial biopsy specimens 1 year apart by five pathologists. Setting: Large military tertiary care center. Patients: Endometrial biopsy specimens from 51 patients undergoing evaluation for potential luteal phase defects. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Calculation of the magnitude of the individual and overall intraobserver variation in endometrial dating for the five pathologists and estimation of its potential impact on clinical management. Results: The intraobserver variation was 0.69 ± 0.05 days (means ± SE). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the variation for 1-day or 2-day dating ranges. The theoretical probability of altering clinical management by having the same pathologist redate a given specimen ranged from 15{\%} to 28{\%}. Conclusion: Histologic dating of endometrial biopsies is subject to a small but highly clinically significant intraobserver variability that may have a major impact on clinical management.",
keywords = "endometrium, histology, Luteal phase defect",
author = "Scott, {R. T.} and Russell Snyder and Bagnall, {J. W.} and Reed, {K. D.} and Adair, {C. F.} and Hensley, {S. D.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "652--657",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects

AU - Scott, R. T.

AU - Snyder, Russell

AU - Bagnall, J. W.

AU - Reed, K. D.

AU - Adair, C. F.

AU - Hensley, S. D.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Objective: To determine the magnitude of intraobserver variation in dating endometrial biopsies and its impact on clinical management. Design: Blinded histopathologic interpretation of endometrial biopsy specimens 1 year apart by five pathologists. Setting: Large military tertiary care center. Patients: Endometrial biopsy specimens from 51 patients undergoing evaluation for potential luteal phase defects. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Calculation of the magnitude of the individual and overall intraobserver variation in endometrial dating for the five pathologists and estimation of its potential impact on clinical management. Results: The intraobserver variation was 0.69 ± 0.05 days (means ± SE). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the variation for 1-day or 2-day dating ranges. The theoretical probability of altering clinical management by having the same pathologist redate a given specimen ranged from 15% to 28%. Conclusion: Histologic dating of endometrial biopsies is subject to a small but highly clinically significant intraobserver variability that may have a major impact on clinical management.

AB - Objective: To determine the magnitude of intraobserver variation in dating endometrial biopsies and its impact on clinical management. Design: Blinded histopathologic interpretation of endometrial biopsy specimens 1 year apart by five pathologists. Setting: Large military tertiary care center. Patients: Endometrial biopsy specimens from 51 patients undergoing evaluation for potential luteal phase defects. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Calculation of the magnitude of the individual and overall intraobserver variation in endometrial dating for the five pathologists and estimation of its potential impact on clinical management. Results: The intraobserver variation was 0.69 ± 0.05 days (means ± SE). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the variation for 1-day or 2-day dating ranges. The theoretical probability of altering clinical management by having the same pathologist redate a given specimen ranged from 15% to 28%. Conclusion: Histologic dating of endometrial biopsies is subject to a small but highly clinically significant intraobserver variability that may have a major impact on clinical management.

KW - endometrium

KW - histology

KW - Luteal phase defect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027369047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027369047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8405519

AN - SCOPUS:0027369047

VL - 60

SP - 652

EP - 657

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 4

ER -