Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections

Paris P. Tekkis, Antony J. Senagore, Conor P. Delaney, Victor W. Fazio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

531 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment. Methods: This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections. Results: The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1% (n = 457) compared with 15.3% for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P <0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience. Conclusions: Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-91
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume242
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colorectal Surgery
Learning Curve
Laparoscopy
Odds Ratio
Conversion to Open Surgery
Abdominal Abscess
Risk Adjustment
Social Adjustment
Colectomy
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Operative Time
Patient Selection
Fistula
Body Mass Index
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery : Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. / Tekkis, Paris P.; Senagore, Antony J.; Delaney, Conor P.; Fazio, Victor W.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 242, No. 1, 07.2005, p. 83-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tekkis, Paris P. ; Senagore, Antony J. ; Delaney, Conor P. ; Fazio, Victor W. / Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery : Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. In: Annals of Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 242, No. 1. pp. 83-91.
@article{328c8fb0d4b74708b606ef2bc93d0574,
title = "Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections",
abstract = "Objective: To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment. Methods: This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections. Results: The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1{\%} (n = 457) compared with 15.3{\%} for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P <0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience. Conclusions: Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.",
author = "Tekkis, {Paris P.} and Senagore, {Antony J.} and Delaney, {Conor P.} and Fazio, {Victor W.}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "242",
pages = "83--91",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

T2 - Comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections

AU - Tekkis, Paris P.

AU - Senagore, Antony J.

AU - Delaney, Conor P.

AU - Fazio, Victor W.

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Objective: To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment. Methods: This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections. Results: The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1% (n = 457) compared with 15.3% for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P <0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience. Conclusions: Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.

AB - Objective: To provide a multidimensional analysis of the learning curve in major laparoscopic colonic and rectal surgery and compare outcomes between right-sided versus left-sided resections. Summary Background Data: The laparoscopic learning curve is known to vary between surgeons, may be influenced by the patient selection and operative complexity, and requires appropriate case-mix adjustment. Methods: This is a descriptive single-center study using routinely collected clinical data from 900 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery between November 1991 and April 2003. Outcome measures included operation time, conversion rate (CR), and readmission and postoperative complication rates. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was used to identify patient-, surgeon-, and procedure-related factors associated with conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. A risk-adjusted Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) model was used for evaluating the learning curve for right and left-sided resections. Results: The conversion rate for right-sided colonic resections was 8.1% (n = 457) compared with 15.3% for left-sided colorectal resections (n = 443). Independent predictors of conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery were the body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.07 per unit increase), ASA grade (OR = 1.63 per unit increase), type of resection (left colorectal versus right colonic procedures, OR = 1.5), presence of intra-abdominal abscess (OR = 5.0) or enteric fistula (OR = 4.6), and surgeon's experience (OR 0.9 per 10 additional cases performed). Having adjusted for case-mix, the CUSUM analysis demonstrated a learning curve of 55 cases for right-sided colonic resections versus 62 cases for left-sided resections. Median operative time declined with operative experience (P <0.001). Readmission rates and postoperative complications remained unchanged throughout the series and were not dependent on operative experience. Conclusions: Conversion rates for laparoscopic colectomy are dependent on a multitude of factors that require appropriate adjustment including the learning curve (operative experience) for individual surgeons. The laparoscopic model described can be used as the basis for performance monitoring between or within institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21444434395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21444434395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68

DO - 10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68

M3 - Article

C2 - 15973105

AN - SCOPUS:21444434395

VL - 242

SP - 83

EP - 91

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 1

ER -