TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the lumipulse G TP-N chemiluminescent immunoassay as a syphilis screening test
AU - Ortiz, Daniel A.
AU - Loeffelholz, Michael J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The absence of a gold standard for the immunologic detection of syphilis infection has made syphilis diagnosis challenging for clinical laboratories. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) endorse the traditional RPR-based screening algorithm, while the Association of Public Health Laboratories, the United Kingdom Health Protection Agency, and the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections support the reverse-screening algorithm (8, 11–13). These conflicting recommendations stem from the differing performance characteristics observed with each screening assay. Nontreponemal assays generate fewer falsely reactive results, while treponemal tests are considered to be more sensitive, particularly at detecting early and latent stages of syphilis (8, 14–16). Treponemal screening assays also have the added benefit of being automated, which can improve workflow and reduce costs in high-volume laboratories.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - A syphilis diagnosis is often aided by the detection of treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies. Automated treponemal antibody detection systems enable high-volume clinical laboratories to perform syphilis screening at a faster pace with lower labor costs. The Lumipulse G TP-N chemiluminescent immunoassay is an automated system that qualitatively detects IgG and IgM antibodies against Treponema pallidum antigens in human serum and plasma. To assess performance characteristics and workflow efficiency, the Lumipulse G TP-N assay was compared to the Bioplex 2200 Syphilis IgG multiplex flow immunoassay. Among the 4,134 routine and HIV samples tested by the two automated assays, the percentage of agreement was excellent at 99.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.6% to 99.2%;, 0.89), with the Lumipulse G TP-N having a shorter time to first and subsequent results. All specimens with reactive syphilis screening results were further tested by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) testing (n 231). The results from the RPR-reactive samples (n 82) showed complete concordance with the two automated assays, while the TPPA assay displayed some discrepancies. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) between the TPPA test and the Lumipulse G TP-N test were 98.9% and 77.3%, respectively. The Bioplex 2200 Syphilis IgG immunoassay displayed a similar PPA (100%) but a substantially lower NPA (15.9%). Patient chart reviews of discrepant results suggested that the Lumipulse G TP-N assay produced 27 fewer falsely reactive results and can reduce the amount of additional confirmatory RPR and TPPA testing needed. The analogous performance characteristics of the two automated systems indicate that the Lumipulse G TP-N assay is suitable for high-throughput syphilis screening.
AB - A syphilis diagnosis is often aided by the detection of treponemal and nontreponemal antibodies. Automated treponemal antibody detection systems enable high-volume clinical laboratories to perform syphilis screening at a faster pace with lower labor costs. The Lumipulse G TP-N chemiluminescent immunoassay is an automated system that qualitatively detects IgG and IgM antibodies against Treponema pallidum antigens in human serum and plasma. To assess performance characteristics and workflow efficiency, the Lumipulse G TP-N assay was compared to the Bioplex 2200 Syphilis IgG multiplex flow immunoassay. Among the 4,134 routine and HIV samples tested by the two automated assays, the percentage of agreement was excellent at 99.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.6% to 99.2%;, 0.89), with the Lumipulse G TP-N having a shorter time to first and subsequent results. All specimens with reactive syphilis screening results were further tested by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA) testing (n 231). The results from the RPR-reactive samples (n 82) showed complete concordance with the two automated assays, while the TPPA assay displayed some discrepancies. The positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) between the TPPA test and the Lumipulse G TP-N test were 98.9% and 77.3%, respectively. The Bioplex 2200 Syphilis IgG immunoassay displayed a similar PPA (100%) but a substantially lower NPA (15.9%). Patient chart reviews of discrepant results suggested that the Lumipulse G TP-N assay produced 27 fewer falsely reactive results and can reduce the amount of additional confirmatory RPR and TPPA testing needed. The analogous performance characteristics of the two automated systems indicate that the Lumipulse G TP-N assay is suitable for high-throughput syphilis screening.
KW - Chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay
KW - Lumipulse G TP-N
KW - Syphilis
KW - Treponemal test
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032440967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032440967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/JCM.00966-17
DO - 10.1128/JCM.00966-17
M3 - Article
C2 - 28878003
AN - SCOPUS:85032440967
SN - 0095-1137
VL - 55
SP - 3236
EP - 3241
JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
IS - 11
ER -