Evaluation of the use of an interactive, online resource for competency-based curriculum development

Patricia Beach, Miriam Bar-On, Constance Baldwin, Diane Kittredge, R. Franklin Trimm, Rebecca Henry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate pediatric educators' use of and satisfaction with the Academic Pediatric Association's Educational Guidelines for Pediatric Residency. METHOD: The authors used customized programming to document all registered users and downloaded files from the Guidelines Web site for a 30-month period after site completion. An online survey of volunteer users was conducted. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and December 2007, 1,747 individuals registered on the Web site, and 8,754 files were downloaded. Registrants who downloaded files (n = 1,239) represented 97% of the pediatric residency programs in 2008 that were approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. During 30 months, the frequency of downloads remained robust, peaking each spring. Curriculum-building tools were downloaded by 97% of programs using the site; the majority chose predesigned formats rather than self-selected lists of goals and objectives. Resident evaluation forms and tutorials were downloaded less frequently. A survey was completed by 111 site users, who indicated that the Guidelines tools were useful for Residency Review Committee site visit preparation. Most respondents said that the curriculum-building tools were easy to use, adaptable, and helpful in integration of competencies into residency programs. Respondents rated tutorials highly for educational content and clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The data collection methods offer a practical strategy for evaluating access to online curriculum development tools. The majority of U.S. pediatric residency programs have accessed Guidelines' resources for curriculum development; patterns of use have been sustained over time. Most users preferred the predesigned versions of the materials. Users surveyed found the tools useful for planning rotations and integrating competencies into their programs and reported high satisfaction with the Guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1269-1275
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume84
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

curriculum development
Internship and Residency
Curriculum
Guidelines
Pediatrics
evaluation
resources
Graduate Medical Education
educational content
curriculum
Accreditation
data collection method
Advisory Committees
online survey
accreditation
Volunteers
programming
graduate
educator
resident

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Evaluation of the use of an interactive, online resource for competency-based curriculum development. / Beach, Patricia; Bar-On, Miriam; Baldwin, Constance; Kittredge, Diane; Trimm, R. Franklin; Henry, Rebecca.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 84, No. 9, 09.2009, p. 1269-1275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beach, Patricia ; Bar-On, Miriam ; Baldwin, Constance ; Kittredge, Diane ; Trimm, R. Franklin ; Henry, Rebecca. / Evaluation of the use of an interactive, online resource for competency-based curriculum development. In: Academic Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 84, No. 9. pp. 1269-1275.
@article{0a398c9c961f410daa272ef5c3ccf76c,
title = "Evaluation of the use of an interactive, online resource for competency-based curriculum development",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate pediatric educators' use of and satisfaction with the Academic Pediatric Association's Educational Guidelines for Pediatric Residency. METHOD: The authors used customized programming to document all registered users and downloaded files from the Guidelines Web site for a 30-month period after site completion. An online survey of volunteer users was conducted. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and December 2007, 1,747 individuals registered on the Web site, and 8,754 files were downloaded. Registrants who downloaded files (n = 1,239) represented 97{\%} of the pediatric residency programs in 2008 that were approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. During 30 months, the frequency of downloads remained robust, peaking each spring. Curriculum-building tools were downloaded by 97{\%} of programs using the site; the majority chose predesigned formats rather than self-selected lists of goals and objectives. Resident evaluation forms and tutorials were downloaded less frequently. A survey was completed by 111 site users, who indicated that the Guidelines tools were useful for Residency Review Committee site visit preparation. Most respondents said that the curriculum-building tools were easy to use, adaptable, and helpful in integration of competencies into residency programs. Respondents rated tutorials highly for educational content and clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The data collection methods offer a practical strategy for evaluating access to online curriculum development tools. The majority of U.S. pediatric residency programs have accessed Guidelines' resources for curriculum development; patterns of use have been sustained over time. Most users preferred the predesigned versions of the materials. Users surveyed found the tools useful for planning rotations and integrating competencies into their programs and reported high satisfaction with the Guidelines.",
author = "Patricia Beach and Miriam Bar-On and Constance Baldwin and Diane Kittredge and Trimm, {R. Franklin} and Rebecca Henry",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b18b21",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "1269--1275",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the use of an interactive, online resource for competency-based curriculum development

AU - Beach, Patricia

AU - Bar-On, Miriam

AU - Baldwin, Constance

AU - Kittredge, Diane

AU - Trimm, R. Franklin

AU - Henry, Rebecca

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate pediatric educators' use of and satisfaction with the Academic Pediatric Association's Educational Guidelines for Pediatric Residency. METHOD: The authors used customized programming to document all registered users and downloaded files from the Guidelines Web site for a 30-month period after site completion. An online survey of volunteer users was conducted. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and December 2007, 1,747 individuals registered on the Web site, and 8,754 files were downloaded. Registrants who downloaded files (n = 1,239) represented 97% of the pediatric residency programs in 2008 that were approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. During 30 months, the frequency of downloads remained robust, peaking each spring. Curriculum-building tools were downloaded by 97% of programs using the site; the majority chose predesigned formats rather than self-selected lists of goals and objectives. Resident evaluation forms and tutorials were downloaded less frequently. A survey was completed by 111 site users, who indicated that the Guidelines tools were useful for Residency Review Committee site visit preparation. Most respondents said that the curriculum-building tools were easy to use, adaptable, and helpful in integration of competencies into residency programs. Respondents rated tutorials highly for educational content and clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The data collection methods offer a practical strategy for evaluating access to online curriculum development tools. The majority of U.S. pediatric residency programs have accessed Guidelines' resources for curriculum development; patterns of use have been sustained over time. Most users preferred the predesigned versions of the materials. Users surveyed found the tools useful for planning rotations and integrating competencies into their programs and reported high satisfaction with the Guidelines.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate pediatric educators' use of and satisfaction with the Academic Pediatric Association's Educational Guidelines for Pediatric Residency. METHOD: The authors used customized programming to document all registered users and downloaded files from the Guidelines Web site for a 30-month period after site completion. An online survey of volunteer users was conducted. RESULTS: Between July 2005 and December 2007, 1,747 individuals registered on the Web site, and 8,754 files were downloaded. Registrants who downloaded files (n = 1,239) represented 97% of the pediatric residency programs in 2008 that were approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. During 30 months, the frequency of downloads remained robust, peaking each spring. Curriculum-building tools were downloaded by 97% of programs using the site; the majority chose predesigned formats rather than self-selected lists of goals and objectives. Resident evaluation forms and tutorials were downloaded less frequently. A survey was completed by 111 site users, who indicated that the Guidelines tools were useful for Residency Review Committee site visit preparation. Most respondents said that the curriculum-building tools were easy to use, adaptable, and helpful in integration of competencies into residency programs. Respondents rated tutorials highly for educational content and clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The data collection methods offer a practical strategy for evaluating access to online curriculum development tools. The majority of U.S. pediatric residency programs have accessed Guidelines' resources for curriculum development; patterns of use have been sustained over time. Most users preferred the predesigned versions of the materials. Users surveyed found the tools useful for planning rotations and integrating competencies into their programs and reported high satisfaction with the Guidelines.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349099620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349099620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b18b21

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b18b21

M3 - Article

C2 - 19707070

AN - SCOPUS:70349099620

VL - 84

SP - 1269

EP - 1275

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 9

ER -