Evolution of Multidisciplinary Translational Teams (MTTs): Insights for Accelerating Translational Innovations

Kevin C. Wooten, William Calhoun, Suresh Bhavnani, Robert M. Rose, Bill Ameredes, Allan R. Brasier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is growing consensus about the factors critical for development and productivity of multidisciplinary teams, but few studies have evaluated their longitudinal changes. We present a longitudinal study of 10 multidisciplinary translational teams (MTTs), based on team process and outcome measures, evaluated before and after 3 years of CTSA collaboration. Using a mixed methods approach, an expert panel of five judges (familiar with the progress of the teams) independently rated team performance based on four process and four outcome measures, and achieved a rating consensus. Although all teams made progress in translational domains, other process and outcome measures were highly variable. The trajectory profiles identified four categories of team performance. Objective bibliometric analysis of CTSA-supported MTTs with positive growth in process scores showed that these teams tended to have enhanced scientific outcomes and published in new scientific domains, indicating the conduct of innovative science. Case exemplars revealed that MTTs that experienced growth in both process and outcome evaluative criteria also experienced greater innovation, defined as publications in different areas of science. Of the eight evaluative criteria, leadership-related behaviors were the most resistant to the interventions introduced. Well-managed MTTs demonstrate objective productivity and facilitate innovation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)542-552
Number of pages11
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Process Assessment (Health Care)
Innovation
Productivity
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Consensus
Bibliometrics
Trajectories
Growth
Longitudinal Studies
Publications

Keywords

  • Multidisciplinary teams
  • Team evolution
  • Translational research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Evolution of Multidisciplinary Translational Teams (MTTs) : Insights for Accelerating Translational Innovations. / Wooten, Kevin C.; Calhoun, William; Bhavnani, Suresh; Rose, Robert M.; Ameredes, Bill; Brasier, Allan R.

In: Clinical and Translational Science, Vol. 8, No. 5, 01.10.2015, p. 542-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90fd36afdc2a4eb7ac3a707e506e6361,
title = "Evolution of Multidisciplinary Translational Teams (MTTs): Insights for Accelerating Translational Innovations",
abstract = "There is growing consensus about the factors critical for development and productivity of multidisciplinary teams, but few studies have evaluated their longitudinal changes. We present a longitudinal study of 10 multidisciplinary translational teams (MTTs), based on team process and outcome measures, evaluated before and after 3 years of CTSA collaboration. Using a mixed methods approach, an expert panel of five judges (familiar with the progress of the teams) independently rated team performance based on four process and four outcome measures, and achieved a rating consensus. Although all teams made progress in translational domains, other process and outcome measures were highly variable. The trajectory profiles identified four categories of team performance. Objective bibliometric analysis of CTSA-supported MTTs with positive growth in process scores showed that these teams tended to have enhanced scientific outcomes and published in new scientific domains, indicating the conduct of innovative science. Case exemplars revealed that MTTs that experienced growth in both process and outcome evaluative criteria also experienced greater innovation, defined as publications in different areas of science. Of the eight evaluative criteria, leadership-related behaviors were the most resistant to the interventions introduced. Well-managed MTTs demonstrate objective productivity and facilitate innovation.",
keywords = "Multidisciplinary teams, Team evolution, Translational research",
author = "Wooten, {Kevin C.} and William Calhoun and Suresh Bhavnani and Rose, {Robert M.} and Bill Ameredes and Brasier, {Allan R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/cts.12266",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "542--552",
journal = "Clinical and Translational Science",
issn = "1752-8054",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evolution of Multidisciplinary Translational Teams (MTTs)

T2 - Insights for Accelerating Translational Innovations

AU - Wooten, Kevin C.

AU - Calhoun, William

AU - Bhavnani, Suresh

AU - Rose, Robert M.

AU - Ameredes, Bill

AU - Brasier, Allan R.

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - There is growing consensus about the factors critical for development and productivity of multidisciplinary teams, but few studies have evaluated their longitudinal changes. We present a longitudinal study of 10 multidisciplinary translational teams (MTTs), based on team process and outcome measures, evaluated before and after 3 years of CTSA collaboration. Using a mixed methods approach, an expert panel of five judges (familiar with the progress of the teams) independently rated team performance based on four process and four outcome measures, and achieved a rating consensus. Although all teams made progress in translational domains, other process and outcome measures were highly variable. The trajectory profiles identified four categories of team performance. Objective bibliometric analysis of CTSA-supported MTTs with positive growth in process scores showed that these teams tended to have enhanced scientific outcomes and published in new scientific domains, indicating the conduct of innovative science. Case exemplars revealed that MTTs that experienced growth in both process and outcome evaluative criteria also experienced greater innovation, defined as publications in different areas of science. Of the eight evaluative criteria, leadership-related behaviors were the most resistant to the interventions introduced. Well-managed MTTs demonstrate objective productivity and facilitate innovation.

AB - There is growing consensus about the factors critical for development and productivity of multidisciplinary teams, but few studies have evaluated their longitudinal changes. We present a longitudinal study of 10 multidisciplinary translational teams (MTTs), based on team process and outcome measures, evaluated before and after 3 years of CTSA collaboration. Using a mixed methods approach, an expert panel of five judges (familiar with the progress of the teams) independently rated team performance based on four process and four outcome measures, and achieved a rating consensus. Although all teams made progress in translational domains, other process and outcome measures were highly variable. The trajectory profiles identified four categories of team performance. Objective bibliometric analysis of CTSA-supported MTTs with positive growth in process scores showed that these teams tended to have enhanced scientific outcomes and published in new scientific domains, indicating the conduct of innovative science. Case exemplars revealed that MTTs that experienced growth in both process and outcome evaluative criteria also experienced greater innovation, defined as publications in different areas of science. Of the eight evaluative criteria, leadership-related behaviors were the most resistant to the interventions introduced. Well-managed MTTs demonstrate objective productivity and facilitate innovation.

KW - Multidisciplinary teams

KW - Team evolution

KW - Translational research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946499725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946499725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cts.12266

DO - 10.1111/cts.12266

M3 - Article

C2 - 25801998

AN - SCOPUS:84946499725

VL - 8

SP - 542

EP - 552

JO - Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Clinical and Translational Science

SN - 1752-8054

IS - 5

ER -