TY - JOUR
T1 - Evolutionary Action Score of TP53 Analysis in Pathologically High-Risk Human Papillomavirus-Negative Head and Neck Cancer From a Phase 2 Clinical Trial
T2 - NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0234
AU - Michikawa, Chieko
AU - Torres-Saavedra, Pedro A.
AU - Silver, Natalie L.
AU - Harari, Paul M.
AU - Kies, Merrill S.
AU - Rosenthal, David I.
AU - Le, Quynh Thu
AU - Jordan, Richard C.
AU - Duose, Dzifa Y.
AU - Mallampati, Saradhi
AU - Trivedi, Sanchit
AU - Luthra, Rajyalakshmi
AU - Wistuba, Ignacio I.
AU - Osman, Abdullah A.
AU - Lichtarge, Olivier
AU - Foote, Robert L.
AU - Parvathaneni, Upendra
AU - Hayes, D. Neil
AU - Pickering, Curtis R.
AU - Myers, Jeffrey N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 NRG Oncology
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Purpose: An evolutionary action scoring algorithm (EAp53) based on phylogenetic sequence variations stratifies patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) bearing TP53 missense mutations as high-risk, associated with poor outcomes, or low-risk, with similar outcomes as TP53 wild-type, and has been validated as a reliable prognostic marker. We performed this study to further validate prior findings demonstrating that EAp53 is a prognostic marker for patients with locally advanced HNSCC and explored its predictive value for treatment outcomes to adjuvant bio-chemoradiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Eighty-one resection samples from patients treated surgically for stage III or IV human papillomavirus-negative HNSCC with high-risk pathologic features, who received either radiation therapy + cetuximab + cisplatin (cisplatin) or radiation therapy + cetuximab + docetaxel (docetaxel) as adjuvant treatment in a phase 2 study were subjected to TP53 targeted sequencing and EAp53 scoring to correlate with clinical outcomes. Due to the limited sample size, patients were combined into 2 EAp53 groups: (1) wild-type or low-risk; and (2) high-risk or other. Results: At a median follow-up of 9.8 years, there was a significant interaction between EAp53 group and treatment for overall survival (P = .008), disease-free survival (P = .05), and distant metastasis (DM; P = .004). In wild-type or low-risk group, the docetaxel arm showed significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.11, [0.03-0.36]), disease-free survival (HR 0.24, [0.09-0.61]), and less DM (HR 0.04, [0.01-0.31]) than the cisplatin arm. In high-risk or other group, differences between treatments were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The docetaxel arm was associated with better survival than the cisplatin arm for patients with wild-type or low-risk EAp53. These benefits appear to be largely driven by a reduction in DM.
AB - Purpose: An evolutionary action scoring algorithm (EAp53) based on phylogenetic sequence variations stratifies patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) bearing TP53 missense mutations as high-risk, associated with poor outcomes, or low-risk, with similar outcomes as TP53 wild-type, and has been validated as a reliable prognostic marker. We performed this study to further validate prior findings demonstrating that EAp53 is a prognostic marker for patients with locally advanced HNSCC and explored its predictive value for treatment outcomes to adjuvant bio-chemoradiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Eighty-one resection samples from patients treated surgically for stage III or IV human papillomavirus-negative HNSCC with high-risk pathologic features, who received either radiation therapy + cetuximab + cisplatin (cisplatin) or radiation therapy + cetuximab + docetaxel (docetaxel) as adjuvant treatment in a phase 2 study were subjected to TP53 targeted sequencing and EAp53 scoring to correlate with clinical outcomes. Due to the limited sample size, patients were combined into 2 EAp53 groups: (1) wild-type or low-risk; and (2) high-risk or other. Results: At a median follow-up of 9.8 years, there was a significant interaction between EAp53 group and treatment for overall survival (P = .008), disease-free survival (P = .05), and distant metastasis (DM; P = .004). In wild-type or low-risk group, the docetaxel arm showed significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.11, [0.03-0.36]), disease-free survival (HR 0.24, [0.09-0.61]), and less DM (HR 0.04, [0.01-0.31]) than the cisplatin arm. In high-risk or other group, differences between treatments were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The docetaxel arm was associated with better survival than the cisplatin arm for patients with wild-type or low-risk EAp53. These benefits appear to be largely driven by a reduction in DM.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134754020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134754020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100989
DO - 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100989
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134754020
SN - 2452-1094
VL - 7
JO - Advances in Radiation Oncology
JF - Advances in Radiation Oncology
IS - 6
M1 - 100989
ER -