Examining spatial inequality in COVID-19 positivity rates across New York City ZIP codes

Tse Chuan Yang; Seulki Kim; Yunhan Zhao; Seung won Emily Choi

doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102574

Examining spatial inequality in COVID-19 positivity rates across New York City ZIP codes

Tse Chuan Yang
, Seulki Kim
, Yunhan Zhao
, Seung won Emily Choi

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

We aim to understand the spatial inequality in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positivity rates across New York City (NYC) ZIP codes. Applying Bayesian spatial negative binomial models to a ZIP-code level dataset (N = 177) as of May 31st, 2020, we find that (1) the racial/ethnic minority groups are associated with COVID-19 positivity rates; (2) the percentages of remote workers are negatively associated with positivity rates, whereas older population and household size show a positive association; and (3) while ZIP codes in the Bronx and Queens have higher COVID-19 positivity rates, the strongest spatial effects are clustered in Brooklyn and Manhattan.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	102574
Journal	Health and Place
Volume	69
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102574
State	Published - May 2021
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Bayesian spatial modeling
COVID-19
New York City
Spatial inequality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health(social science)
Sociology and Political Science
Life-span and Life-course Studies

Access to Document

10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102574

Cite this

@article{704624c1e83a41f496f8cf2f009407b9,

title = "Examining spatial inequality in COVID-19 positivity rates across New York City ZIP codes",

abstract = "We aim to understand the spatial inequality in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positivity rates across New York City (NYC) ZIP codes. Applying Bayesian spatial negative binomial models to a ZIP-code level dataset (N = 177) as of May 31st, 2020, we find that (1) the racial/ethnic minority groups are associated with COVID-19 positivity rates; (2) the percentages of remote workers are negatively associated with positivity rates, whereas older population and household size show a positive association; and (3) while ZIP codes in the Bronx and Queens have higher COVID-19 positivity rates, the strongest spatial effects are clustered in Brooklyn and Manhattan.",

keywords = "Bayesian spatial modeling, COVID-19, New York City, Spatial inequality",

author = "Yang, \{Tse Chuan\} and Seulki Kim and Yunhan Zhao and Choi, \{Seung won Emily\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2021",

month = may,

doi = "10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102574",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "69",

journal = "Health and Place",

issn = "1353-8292",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining spatial inequality in COVID-19 positivity rates across New York City ZIP codes

AU - Yang, Tse Chuan

AU - Kim, Seulki

AU - Zhao, Yunhan

AU - Choi, Seung won Emily

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - We aim to understand the spatial inequality in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positivity rates across New York City (NYC) ZIP codes. Applying Bayesian spatial negative binomial models to a ZIP-code level dataset (N = 177) as of May 31st, 2020, we find that (1) the racial/ethnic minority groups are associated with COVID-19 positivity rates; (2) the percentages of remote workers are negatively associated with positivity rates, whereas older population and household size show a positive association; and (3) while ZIP codes in the Bronx and Queens have higher COVID-19 positivity rates, the strongest spatial effects are clustered in Brooklyn and Manhattan.

AB - We aim to understand the spatial inequality in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positivity rates across New York City (NYC) ZIP codes. Applying Bayesian spatial negative binomial models to a ZIP-code level dataset (N = 177) as of May 31st, 2020, we find that (1) the racial/ethnic minority groups are associated with COVID-19 positivity rates; (2) the percentages of remote workers are negatively associated with positivity rates, whereas older population and household size show a positive association; and (3) while ZIP codes in the Bronx and Queens have higher COVID-19 positivity rates, the strongest spatial effects are clustered in Brooklyn and Manhattan.

KW - Bayesian spatial modeling

KW - COVID-19

KW - New York City

KW - Spatial inequality

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105606089

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105606089#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102574

DO - 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102574

M3 - Article

C2 - 33895489

AN - SCOPUS:85105606089

SN - 1353-8292

VL - 69

JO - Health and Place

JF - Health and Place

M1 - 102574

ER -

Examining spatial inequality in COVID-19 positivity rates across New York City ZIP codes

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this