Exploring professional-related outcome differences between phlebotomy technicians, medical laboratory technicians, and medical technologists.

Gary Blau, Jim Portwood, Susan Chapman, Kay Doyle, Blair Holladay, Vicki Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As part of a large scale practice analysis on Phlebotomy Technicians (PBTs), Medical Laboratory Technicians (MLTs), and Medical Technologists (MTs), additional data on four "home made measures" of professional-related outcomes, i.e., professional development, quality assurance monitoring, employer reimbursement, and types of continuing education, were also collected. In order to maximize data use from the overall sample of 3,097 respondents (constituting only 18% of the population surveyed), pairwise deletion of data was utilized. No a priori differences between PBTs, MLTs and MTs on these outcomes were hypothesized, and none were found for professional development and employer reimbursement. The finding that PBTs were lower than MLTs and MTs on quality assurance monitoring was interpreted as being job expected. Despite the study limitations, professional development for not just laboratory professionals but all allied health professionals remains an important recruitment and retention issue, as demand for all health services is expected to increase.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e93-e108
JournalJournal of allied health
Volume37
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring professional-related outcome differences between phlebotomy technicians, medical laboratory technicians, and medical technologists.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this