Feasibility Study Using Propensity Score Matching Methods for the Pseudo-Common Person Equating Requirement

Ickpyo Hong, Catherine C. Hay, Timothy Reistetter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We tested if a propensity score (PS) matching method supports the unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model which is critical to link similar rehabilitation instruments. We obtained 1,013 respondents from the 2009 Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly Frailty study. We used a unidimensional item pool of 10 SF-36 physical function and nine activities of daily living items. Subjects were matched based on their functionality (high and low), and exploratory factor analysis was used to test if the item pool in the matched sample holds the unidimensionality assumption. The study findings revealed that the matched sample demonstrated two distinct measurement structures with excellent model fit. This finding indicates that the PS matching did not mimic the common-person assumption. Therefore, the combination of PS matching and common-person equating method may not be appropriate to equate two rehabilitation-related instruments administered to two different groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOTJR Occupation, Participation and Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jun 1 2018

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
Feasibility Studies
Rehabilitation
Activities of Daily Living
Hispanic Americans
Statistical Factor Analysis
Epidemiologic Studies
Population

Keywords

  • activities of daily living
  • factor analysis
  • outcome measure
  • propensity score matching
  • SF-36
  • unidimensionality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Feasibility Study Using Propensity Score Matching Methods for the Pseudo-Common Person Equating Requirement. / Hong, Ickpyo; Hay, Catherine C.; Reistetter, Timothy.

In: OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 01.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{749601e6d55546ddb928156592b1c638,
title = "Feasibility Study Using Propensity Score Matching Methods for the Pseudo-Common Person Equating Requirement",
abstract = "We tested if a propensity score (PS) matching method supports the unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model which is critical to link similar rehabilitation instruments. We obtained 1,013 respondents from the 2009 Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly Frailty study. We used a unidimensional item pool of 10 SF-36 physical function and nine activities of daily living items. Subjects were matched based on their functionality (high and low), and exploratory factor analysis was used to test if the item pool in the matched sample holds the unidimensionality assumption. The study findings revealed that the matched sample demonstrated two distinct measurement structures with excellent model fit. This finding indicates that the PS matching did not mimic the common-person assumption. Therefore, the combination of PS matching and common-person equating method may not be appropriate to equate two rehabilitation-related instruments administered to two different groups.",
keywords = "activities of daily living, factor analysis, outcome measure, propensity score matching, SF-36, unidimensionality",
author = "Ickpyo Hong and Hay, {Catherine C.} and Timothy Reistetter",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1539449218778535",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health",
issn = "1539-4492",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility Study Using Propensity Score Matching Methods for the Pseudo-Common Person Equating Requirement

AU - Hong, Ickpyo

AU - Hay, Catherine C.

AU - Reistetter, Timothy

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - We tested if a propensity score (PS) matching method supports the unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model which is critical to link similar rehabilitation instruments. We obtained 1,013 respondents from the 2009 Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly Frailty study. We used a unidimensional item pool of 10 SF-36 physical function and nine activities of daily living items. Subjects were matched based on their functionality (high and low), and exploratory factor analysis was used to test if the item pool in the matched sample holds the unidimensionality assumption. The study findings revealed that the matched sample demonstrated two distinct measurement structures with excellent model fit. This finding indicates that the PS matching did not mimic the common-person assumption. Therefore, the combination of PS matching and common-person equating method may not be appropriate to equate two rehabilitation-related instruments administered to two different groups.

AB - We tested if a propensity score (PS) matching method supports the unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model which is critical to link similar rehabilitation instruments. We obtained 1,013 respondents from the 2009 Hispanic Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly Frailty study. We used a unidimensional item pool of 10 SF-36 physical function and nine activities of daily living items. Subjects were matched based on their functionality (high and low), and exploratory factor analysis was used to test if the item pool in the matched sample holds the unidimensionality assumption. The study findings revealed that the matched sample demonstrated two distinct measurement structures with excellent model fit. This finding indicates that the PS matching did not mimic the common-person assumption. Therefore, the combination of PS matching and common-person equating method may not be appropriate to equate two rehabilitation-related instruments administered to two different groups.

KW - activities of daily living

KW - factor analysis

KW - outcome measure

KW - propensity score matching

KW - SF-36

KW - unidimensionality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048250587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048250587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1539449218778535

DO - 10.1177/1539449218778535

M3 - Article

JO - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health

JF - OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health

SN - 1539-4492

ER -