Feeding jejunostomy tube placement during resection of gastric cancers

Zhifei Sun, Mithun M. Shenoi, Daniel P. Nussbaum, Jeffrey E. Keenan, Brian C. Gulack, Douglas S. Tyler, Paul J. Speicher, Dan G. Blazer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Feeding tube placement is common among patients undergoing gastrectomy, and national guidelines currently recommend consideration of a feeding jejunostomy tube (FJT) for all patients undergoing resection for gastric cancer. However, data are limited regarding the safety of FJT placement at the time of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods The 2005-2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant User Files were queried to identify patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Subjects were classified by the concomitant placement of an FJT. Groups were then propensity matched using a 1:1 nearest neighbor algorithm, and outcomes were compared between groups. The primary outcomes of interest were overall 30-d overall complications and mortality. Secondary end points included major complications, surgical site infection, and early reoperation. Results In total, 2980 subjects underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer, among whom 715 (24%) also had an FJT placed. Patients who had an FJT placed were more likely to be male (61.6% versus 56.6%, P = 0.02), have recent weight loss (21.0% versus 14.8%, P < 0.01), and have undergone recent chemotherapy (7.9% versus 4.2%, P < 0.01) and radiation therapy (4.2% versus 1.3%, P < 0.01). They were also more likely to have undergone total (compared with partial) gastrectomy (66.6% versus 28.6%, P < 0.01) and have concomitant resection of an adjacent organ (40.4 versus 24.1%, P < 0.01). After adjustment with propensity matching, however, all baseline characteristics and treatment variables were highly similar. Between groups, there were no statistically significant differences in 30-d overall complications (38.8% versus 36.1%, P = 0.32) or mortality (5.8 versus 3.7%, P = 0.08). There were also no differences in major complications, surgical site infection, or early reoperation. Operative time was slightly longer among patients with feeding tubes placed (median, 248 versus 233 min, P = 0.01), but otherwise there were no significant differences in any outcomes between groups. Conclusions Concomitant placement of FJT at the time of gastrectomy may result in slightly increased operative times but does not appear to lead to increased perioperative morbidity or mortality. Further investigation is needed to identify the patients most likely to benefit from FJT placement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-194
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Surgical Research
Volume200
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 23 2014

Keywords

  • Feeding jejunostomy tube
  • Gastrectomy
  • Gastric cancer
  • Nutrition
  • Outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Feeding jejunostomy tube placement during resection of gastric cancers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this