Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference

L. Uphouse, C. Hiegel, J. Sarkar, J. Hurlburt, C. Templeton, Jutatip Guptarak, N. Maswood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The partner preference paradigm was used to test the hypothesis that mild restraint reduced sexual motivation of female rats. Ovariectomized rats were primed with 10 μg estradiol benzoate or estradiol benzoate and 500 μg progesterone. Additional rats were injected with sesame seed oil. These three groups of rats (oil-oil, estradiol benzoate-oil, or estradiol benzoate-progesterone; OO, EO, EP) were placed for 10 min in an arena, the ends of which enclosed either a sexually active male or an ovariectomized, unprimed female. Time spent near the sexually active male relative to time spent near either stimulus animal was used as the index of male preference. As expected, hormonal treatment significantly increased male preference. After this first 10 min interval, females were returned to the home cage or restrained for 5 min in a Decapicone®. Thereafter, male preference was recorded for another 10 min. Consistent with the first 10 min period, EP rats spent significantly more time near the male than did OO rats while EO rats were intermediate. There was no effect of restraint, but there was a significant increase in self-grooming. These findings contrast with previous studies and allow the suggestion that a brief, mild restraint fails to influence the female's sexual motivation. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)758-762
Number of pages5
JournalPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Volume90
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gonadal Hormones
Rats
Oils
Motivation
Sesame Oil
Oilseeds
Grooming
Seeds
Animals

Keywords

  • Females
  • Grooming
  • Hormones
  • Ovariectomized females
  • Sexual motivation
  • Stress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Uphouse, L., Hiegel, C., Sarkar, J., Hurlburt, J., Templeton, C., Guptarak, J., & Maswood, N. (2008). Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 90(4), 758-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2008.05.026

Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference. / Uphouse, L.; Hiegel, C.; Sarkar, J.; Hurlburt, J.; Templeton, C.; Guptarak, Jutatip; Maswood, N.

In: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Vol. 90, No. 4, 01.10.2008, p. 758-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Uphouse, L, Hiegel, C, Sarkar, J, Hurlburt, J, Templeton, C, Guptarak, J & Maswood, N 2008, 'Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference', Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 90, no. 4, pp. 758-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2008.05.026
Uphouse L, Hiegel C, Sarkar J, Hurlburt J, Templeton C, Guptarak J et al. Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2008 Oct 1;90(4):758-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2008.05.026
Uphouse, L. ; Hiegel, C. ; Sarkar, J. ; Hurlburt, J. ; Templeton, C. ; Guptarak, Jutatip ; Maswood, N. / Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference. In: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 2008 ; Vol. 90, No. 4. pp. 758-762.
@article{570eb822af6e44e589fb04aafe6f9e76,
title = "Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference",
abstract = "The partner preference paradigm was used to test the hypothesis that mild restraint reduced sexual motivation of female rats. Ovariectomized rats were primed with 10 μg estradiol benzoate or estradiol benzoate and 500 μg progesterone. Additional rats were injected with sesame seed oil. These three groups of rats (oil-oil, estradiol benzoate-oil, or estradiol benzoate-progesterone; OO, EO, EP) were placed for 10 min in an arena, the ends of which enclosed either a sexually active male or an ovariectomized, unprimed female. Time spent near the sexually active male relative to time spent near either stimulus animal was used as the index of male preference. As expected, hormonal treatment significantly increased male preference. After this first 10 min interval, females were returned to the home cage or restrained for 5 min in a Decapicone{\circledR}. Thereafter, male preference was recorded for another 10 min. Consistent with the first 10 min period, EP rats spent significantly more time near the male than did OO rats while EO rats were intermediate. There was no effect of restraint, but there was a significant increase in self-grooming. These findings contrast with previous studies and allow the suggestion that a brief, mild restraint fails to influence the female's sexual motivation. The implications of these findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Females, Grooming, Hormones, Ovariectomized females, Sexual motivation, Stress",
author = "L. Uphouse and C. Hiegel and J. Sarkar and J. Hurlburt and C. Templeton and Jutatip Guptarak and N. Maswood",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pbb.2008.05.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "90",
pages = "758--762",
journal = "Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior",
issn = "0091-3057",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Female gonadal hormones, mild restraint, and male preference

AU - Uphouse, L.

AU - Hiegel, C.

AU - Sarkar, J.

AU - Hurlburt, J.

AU - Templeton, C.

AU - Guptarak, Jutatip

AU - Maswood, N.

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - The partner preference paradigm was used to test the hypothesis that mild restraint reduced sexual motivation of female rats. Ovariectomized rats were primed with 10 μg estradiol benzoate or estradiol benzoate and 500 μg progesterone. Additional rats were injected with sesame seed oil. These three groups of rats (oil-oil, estradiol benzoate-oil, or estradiol benzoate-progesterone; OO, EO, EP) were placed for 10 min in an arena, the ends of which enclosed either a sexually active male or an ovariectomized, unprimed female. Time spent near the sexually active male relative to time spent near either stimulus animal was used as the index of male preference. As expected, hormonal treatment significantly increased male preference. After this first 10 min interval, females were returned to the home cage or restrained for 5 min in a Decapicone®. Thereafter, male preference was recorded for another 10 min. Consistent with the first 10 min period, EP rats spent significantly more time near the male than did OO rats while EO rats were intermediate. There was no effect of restraint, but there was a significant increase in self-grooming. These findings contrast with previous studies and allow the suggestion that a brief, mild restraint fails to influence the female's sexual motivation. The implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - The partner preference paradigm was used to test the hypothesis that mild restraint reduced sexual motivation of female rats. Ovariectomized rats were primed with 10 μg estradiol benzoate or estradiol benzoate and 500 μg progesterone. Additional rats were injected with sesame seed oil. These three groups of rats (oil-oil, estradiol benzoate-oil, or estradiol benzoate-progesterone; OO, EO, EP) were placed for 10 min in an arena, the ends of which enclosed either a sexually active male or an ovariectomized, unprimed female. Time spent near the sexually active male relative to time spent near either stimulus animal was used as the index of male preference. As expected, hormonal treatment significantly increased male preference. After this first 10 min interval, females were returned to the home cage or restrained for 5 min in a Decapicone®. Thereafter, male preference was recorded for another 10 min. Consistent with the first 10 min period, EP rats spent significantly more time near the male than did OO rats while EO rats were intermediate. There was no effect of restraint, but there was a significant increase in self-grooming. These findings contrast with previous studies and allow the suggestion that a brief, mild restraint fails to influence the female's sexual motivation. The implications of these findings are discussed.

KW - Females

KW - Grooming

KW - Hormones

KW - Ovariectomized females

KW - Sexual motivation

KW - Stress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48749085955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48749085955&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.05.026

DO - 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.05.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 18582496

AN - SCOPUS:48749085955

VL - 90

SP - 758

EP - 762

JO - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

JF - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

SN - 0091-3057

IS - 4

ER -