Filovirus contamination of cell cultures.

C. J. Peters, P. B. Jahrling, Thomas Ksiazek, E. D. Johnson, H. W. Lupton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The filoviruses Marburg and Ebola comprise a newly recognized family of viruses. The first filovirus to be isolated was Marburg virus in 1967. This virus was imported in shipments of African green monkeys from Uganda and infected several cell-culture technicians, with serious illness resulting. The rarity of Marburg and Ebola virus transmission, decreasing use of imported African monkeys, and quarantine efforts have presumably been responsible for the lack of additional episodes until 1989, when a new filovirus related to Ebola was isolated from quarantined monkeys in Reston, Virginia. This virus was imported on multiple occasions from a Philippine supplier of cynomolgus macaques as a consequence of an epidemic of acute infections in the foreign holding facility. While quarantine procedures prevented the use of any of these animals in research and the three human infections that occurred were asymptomatic, this episode emphasizes that these little understood viruses have considerable potential for mischief. The finding of antibodies reacting with Ebola viruses in many biomedically important Old World primates, including colonized monkeys in the U.S., emphasizes the need for more research to understand the specificity of the antibodies, spectrum of filovirus strains in nature, potential hosts, and true distribution of the family. The filoviruses grow well in primary and established cell strains and cell lines, and cytopathogenic effects may be absent or require several days to be manifest, leading to the possibility of occult contamination. The known viruses are readily detected by polyclonal and monoclonal antibody staining of cells and by electron microscopy; nucleic acid probes exist to develop more sensitive techniques if warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-274
Number of pages8
JournalDevelopments in Biological Standardization
Volume76
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cell Culture Techniques
Viruses
Marburgvirus
Ebolavirus
Haplorhini
Quarantine
Nucleic Acid Probes
Cercopithecus aethiops
Philippines
Uganda
Antibody Specificity
Macaca
Infection
Primates
Electron Microscopy
Monoclonal Antibodies
Staining and Labeling
Cell Line
Antibodies
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology

Cite this

Peters, C. J., Jahrling, P. B., Ksiazek, T., Johnson, E. D., & Lupton, H. W. (1992). Filovirus contamination of cell cultures. Developments in Biological Standardization, 76, 267-274.

Filovirus contamination of cell cultures. / Peters, C. J.; Jahrling, P. B.; Ksiazek, Thomas; Johnson, E. D.; Lupton, H. W.

In: Developments in Biological Standardization, Vol. 76, 1992, p. 267-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Peters, CJ, Jahrling, PB, Ksiazek, T, Johnson, ED & Lupton, HW 1992, 'Filovirus contamination of cell cultures.', Developments in Biological Standardization, vol. 76, pp. 267-274.
Peters CJ, Jahrling PB, Ksiazek T, Johnson ED, Lupton HW. Filovirus contamination of cell cultures. Developments in Biological Standardization. 1992;76:267-274.
Peters, C. J. ; Jahrling, P. B. ; Ksiazek, Thomas ; Johnson, E. D. ; Lupton, H. W. / Filovirus contamination of cell cultures. In: Developments in Biological Standardization. 1992 ; Vol. 76. pp. 267-274.
@article{e00d870079a64c69bbb5fc6c51d41dcb,
title = "Filovirus contamination of cell cultures.",
abstract = "The filoviruses Marburg and Ebola comprise a newly recognized family of viruses. The first filovirus to be isolated was Marburg virus in 1967. This virus was imported in shipments of African green monkeys from Uganda and infected several cell-culture technicians, with serious illness resulting. The rarity of Marburg and Ebola virus transmission, decreasing use of imported African monkeys, and quarantine efforts have presumably been responsible for the lack of additional episodes until 1989, when a new filovirus related to Ebola was isolated from quarantined monkeys in Reston, Virginia. This virus was imported on multiple occasions from a Philippine supplier of cynomolgus macaques as a consequence of an epidemic of acute infections in the foreign holding facility. While quarantine procedures prevented the use of any of these animals in research and the three human infections that occurred were asymptomatic, this episode emphasizes that these little understood viruses have considerable potential for mischief. The finding of antibodies reacting with Ebola viruses in many biomedically important Old World primates, including colonized monkeys in the U.S., emphasizes the need for more research to understand the specificity of the antibodies, spectrum of filovirus strains in nature, potential hosts, and true distribution of the family. The filoviruses grow well in primary and established cell strains and cell lines, and cytopathogenic effects may be absent or require several days to be manifest, leading to the possibility of occult contamination. The known viruses are readily detected by polyclonal and monoclonal antibody staining of cells and by electron microscopy; nucleic acid probes exist to develop more sensitive techniques if warranted.",
author = "Peters, {C. J.} and Jahrling, {P. B.} and Thomas Ksiazek and Johnson, {E. D.} and Lupton, {H. W.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "267--274",
journal = "Developments in Biological Standardization",
issn = "0301-5149",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Filovirus contamination of cell cultures.

AU - Peters, C. J.

AU - Jahrling, P. B.

AU - Ksiazek, Thomas

AU - Johnson, E. D.

AU - Lupton, H. W.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - The filoviruses Marburg and Ebola comprise a newly recognized family of viruses. The first filovirus to be isolated was Marburg virus in 1967. This virus was imported in shipments of African green monkeys from Uganda and infected several cell-culture technicians, with serious illness resulting. The rarity of Marburg and Ebola virus transmission, decreasing use of imported African monkeys, and quarantine efforts have presumably been responsible for the lack of additional episodes until 1989, when a new filovirus related to Ebola was isolated from quarantined monkeys in Reston, Virginia. This virus was imported on multiple occasions from a Philippine supplier of cynomolgus macaques as a consequence of an epidemic of acute infections in the foreign holding facility. While quarantine procedures prevented the use of any of these animals in research and the three human infections that occurred were asymptomatic, this episode emphasizes that these little understood viruses have considerable potential for mischief. The finding of antibodies reacting with Ebola viruses in many biomedically important Old World primates, including colonized monkeys in the U.S., emphasizes the need for more research to understand the specificity of the antibodies, spectrum of filovirus strains in nature, potential hosts, and true distribution of the family. The filoviruses grow well in primary and established cell strains and cell lines, and cytopathogenic effects may be absent or require several days to be manifest, leading to the possibility of occult contamination. The known viruses are readily detected by polyclonal and monoclonal antibody staining of cells and by electron microscopy; nucleic acid probes exist to develop more sensitive techniques if warranted.

AB - The filoviruses Marburg and Ebola comprise a newly recognized family of viruses. The first filovirus to be isolated was Marburg virus in 1967. This virus was imported in shipments of African green monkeys from Uganda and infected several cell-culture technicians, with serious illness resulting. The rarity of Marburg and Ebola virus transmission, decreasing use of imported African monkeys, and quarantine efforts have presumably been responsible for the lack of additional episodes until 1989, when a new filovirus related to Ebola was isolated from quarantined monkeys in Reston, Virginia. This virus was imported on multiple occasions from a Philippine supplier of cynomolgus macaques as a consequence of an epidemic of acute infections in the foreign holding facility. While quarantine procedures prevented the use of any of these animals in research and the three human infections that occurred were asymptomatic, this episode emphasizes that these little understood viruses have considerable potential for mischief. The finding of antibodies reacting with Ebola viruses in many biomedically important Old World primates, including colonized monkeys in the U.S., emphasizes the need for more research to understand the specificity of the antibodies, spectrum of filovirus strains in nature, potential hosts, and true distribution of the family. The filoviruses grow well in primary and established cell strains and cell lines, and cytopathogenic effects may be absent or require several days to be manifest, leading to the possibility of occult contamination. The known viruses are readily detected by polyclonal and monoclonal antibody staining of cells and by electron microscopy; nucleic acid probes exist to develop more sensitive techniques if warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027021677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027021677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 267

EP - 274

JO - Developments in Biological Standardization

JF - Developments in Biological Standardization

SN - 0301-5149

ER -