Abstract
We argued in our joint article that the facilitated consensus model of clinical ethics consultation is incomplete because it does not address the problem of what we have called "unsettled cases." Sabrina Derrington and April Dworetz, Mark Aulisio, and Al Jonsen have each usefully challenged our claims and conclusions. In this brief article we respond to some of their arguments.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 358-362 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Ethics |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Dec 1 2011 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects
- Health(social science)
- Health Policy