Fine-tuning function

Correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR

Liskin Swint-Kruse, Christopher Larson, Bernard Pettitt, Kathleen Shive Matthews

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow "dimerization" through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge·hinge' interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1-62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for finetuning individual repressor function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)778-794
Number of pages17
JournalProtein Science
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hinges
Tuning
DNA
Lac Repressors
Dimerization
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Disulfides
Sequence Analysis
Monomers
Proteins
Molecular dynamics
Molecules
Computer simulation

Keywords

  • Allostery
  • Hinge domain
  • Induction
  • LacI
  • Molecular dynamics
  • PurR
  • Repressor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry

Cite this

Fine-tuning function : Correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR. / Swint-Kruse, Liskin; Larson, Christopher; Pettitt, Bernard; Matthews, Kathleen Shive.

In: Protein Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2002, p. 778-794.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Swint-Kruse, Liskin ; Larson, Christopher ; Pettitt, Bernard ; Matthews, Kathleen Shive. / Fine-tuning function : Correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR. In: Protein Science. 2002 ; Vol. 11, No. 4. pp. 778-794.
@article{6385bb8674e24a0ab405c21f48733799,
title = "Fine-tuning function: Correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR",
abstract = "LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow {"}dimerization{"} through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge·hinge' interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1-62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for finetuning individual repressor function.",
keywords = "Allostery, Hinge domain, Induction, LacI, Molecular dynamics, PurR, Repressor",
author = "Liskin Swint-Kruse and Christopher Larson and Bernard Pettitt and Matthews, {Kathleen Shive}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1110/ps.4050102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "778--794",
journal = "Protein Science",
issn = "0961-8368",
publisher = "Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fine-tuning function

T2 - Correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR

AU - Swint-Kruse, Liskin

AU - Larson, Christopher

AU - Pettitt, Bernard

AU - Matthews, Kathleen Shive

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow "dimerization" through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge·hinge' interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1-62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for finetuning individual repressor function.

AB - LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow "dimerization" through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge·hinge' interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1-62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for finetuning individual repressor function.

KW - Allostery

KW - Hinge domain

KW - Induction

KW - LacI

KW - Molecular dynamics

KW - PurR

KW - Repressor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036127292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036127292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1110/ps.4050102

DO - 10.1110/ps.4050102

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 778

EP - 794

JO - Protein Science

JF - Protein Science

SN - 0961-8368

IS - 4

ER -