Food deprivation induces differential changes in contents and microstructures of digestive tract and appendages in bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus

Amjad Hossain, Hiran M. Dutta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. 1. The digestive tract was compared with the tract appendages (caeca) in bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus in their response to short and long term food deprivation. 2. 2. Fasting for 7 days resulted in 80% reduction of food content in the main tract, but only 40% reduction in appendages (caeca). 3. 3. The intestine exhibited two different patterns of food distribution under fed and food deprived conditions. 4. 4. The histopathological impact of starvation was more prominent on the intestine than on caeca. 5. 5. These results suggest that digestive tract and appendages concommitantly conserve food during food scarcity, but appendages may offer advantages in retaining food longer, and in their greater resistance to starvation-induced effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)769-772
Number of pages4
JournalComparative Biochemistry and Physiology -- Part A: Physiology
Volume100
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Perciformes
Food Deprivation
Gastrointestinal Contents
Fish
Fishes
Food
Microstructure
Starvation
Intestines
Gastrointestinal Tract
Fasting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biochemistry

Cite this

@article{f2c60f53f07546258c59243e3f7f1559,
title = "Food deprivation induces differential changes in contents and microstructures of digestive tract and appendages in bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus",
abstract = "1. 1. The digestive tract was compared with the tract appendages (caeca) in bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus in their response to short and long term food deprivation. 2. 2. Fasting for 7 days resulted in 80{\%} reduction of food content in the main tract, but only 40{\%} reduction in appendages (caeca). 3. 3. The intestine exhibited two different patterns of food distribution under fed and food deprived conditions. 4. 4. The histopathological impact of starvation was more prominent on the intestine than on caeca. 5. 5. These results suggest that digestive tract and appendages concommitantly conserve food during food scarcity, but appendages may offer advantages in retaining food longer, and in their greater resistance to starvation-induced effects.",
author = "Amjad Hossain and Dutta, {Hiran M.}",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1016/0300-9629(91)90406-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "769--772",
journal = "Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Physiology",
issn = "1095-6433",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Food deprivation induces differential changes in contents and microstructures of digestive tract and appendages in bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus

AU - Hossain, Amjad

AU - Dutta, Hiran M.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - 1. 1. The digestive tract was compared with the tract appendages (caeca) in bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus in their response to short and long term food deprivation. 2. 2. Fasting for 7 days resulted in 80% reduction of food content in the main tract, but only 40% reduction in appendages (caeca). 3. 3. The intestine exhibited two different patterns of food distribution under fed and food deprived conditions. 4. 4. The histopathological impact of starvation was more prominent on the intestine than on caeca. 5. 5. These results suggest that digestive tract and appendages concommitantly conserve food during food scarcity, but appendages may offer advantages in retaining food longer, and in their greater resistance to starvation-induced effects.

AB - 1. 1. The digestive tract was compared with the tract appendages (caeca) in bluegill fish, Lepomis macrochirus in their response to short and long term food deprivation. 2. 2. Fasting for 7 days resulted in 80% reduction of food content in the main tract, but only 40% reduction in appendages (caeca). 3. 3. The intestine exhibited two different patterns of food distribution under fed and food deprived conditions. 4. 4. The histopathological impact of starvation was more prominent on the intestine than on caeca. 5. 5. These results suggest that digestive tract and appendages concommitantly conserve food during food scarcity, but appendages may offer advantages in retaining food longer, and in their greater resistance to starvation-induced effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025993960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025993960&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90406-3

DO - 10.1016/0300-9629(91)90406-3

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0025993960

VL - 100

SP - 769

EP - 772

JO - Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Physiology

JF - Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - A Physiology

SN - 1095-6433

IS - 3

ER -