Frequent and early death limits quality of life assessment in patients with advanced malignancies evaluated for palliative surgical intervention

Brian Badgwell, Robert Krouse, Janice Cormier, Caesar Guevara, Vicki Klimberg, Betty Ferrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and optimal timing of quality of life assessment for patients undergoing palliative surgical evaluation. Methods. Patients with an advanced malignancy undergoing consultation for palliative surgical intervention were prospectively enrolled from November 2009 to January 2011. Follow-up quality of life assessment was performed using validated instruments at 1 and 3 months postenrollment. Univariate analysis of variables was performed to identify clinicopathologic variables associated with questionnaire completion. Results. Of 77 patients enrolled, the most common clinical presentations included bowel obstruction (32 %), abdominal pain (21 %), wound complications (18 %), and gastrointestinal bleeding (11 %). Of the 77 patients, 34 (44 %) were treated with nonoperative/nonprocedural care, 9 (12 %) with endoscopic or interventional radiologic procedures, and 34 (44 %) with surgery. Follow-up questionnaires were obtained at 1 month and 3 months in 48 % and 15 %, respectively. A total of 31 patients (40 %) died prior to study completion. On univariate analysis, death was the only factor associated with questionnaire response. All other demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were not associated with response to questionnaires. There were no significant differences in baseline or follow-up quality of life scores between patients treated with surgical intervention or nonoperative management. Conclusions. Death during the study period was a significant factor in limiting adequate follow-up assessment. Future studies attempting to obtain follow-up data on patients evaluated for palliative surgical intervention may require larger patient numbers to account for frequent early death in this population and anticipate the need to account for the high rate of missing data in statistical analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3651-3658
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume19
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Neoplasms
Statistical Data Interpretation
Abdominal Pain
Referral and Consultation
Demography
Hemorrhage
Surveys and Questionnaires
Wounds and Injuries
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Frequent and early death limits quality of life assessment in patients with advanced malignancies evaluated for palliative surgical intervention. / Badgwell, Brian; Krouse, Robert; Cormier, Janice; Guevara, Caesar; Klimberg, Vicki; Ferrell, Betty.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 12, 11.2012, p. 3651-3658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Badgwell, Brian ; Krouse, Robert ; Cormier, Janice ; Guevara, Caesar ; Klimberg, Vicki ; Ferrell, Betty. / Frequent and early death limits quality of life assessment in patients with advanced malignancies evaluated for palliative surgical intervention. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 19, No. 12. pp. 3651-3658.
@article{07c1ebae66c04106bc39ee8de1941a06,
title = "Frequent and early death limits quality of life assessment in patients with advanced malignancies evaluated for palliative surgical intervention",
abstract = "Background. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and optimal timing of quality of life assessment for patients undergoing palliative surgical evaluation. Methods. Patients with an advanced malignancy undergoing consultation for palliative surgical intervention were prospectively enrolled from November 2009 to January 2011. Follow-up quality of life assessment was performed using validated instruments at 1 and 3 months postenrollment. Univariate analysis of variables was performed to identify clinicopathologic variables associated with questionnaire completion. Results. Of 77 patients enrolled, the most common clinical presentations included bowel obstruction (32 {\%}), abdominal pain (21 {\%}), wound complications (18 {\%}), and gastrointestinal bleeding (11 {\%}). Of the 77 patients, 34 (44 {\%}) were treated with nonoperative/nonprocedural care, 9 (12 {\%}) with endoscopic or interventional radiologic procedures, and 34 (44 {\%}) with surgery. Follow-up questionnaires were obtained at 1 month and 3 months in 48 {\%} and 15 {\%}, respectively. A total of 31 patients (40 {\%}) died prior to study completion. On univariate analysis, death was the only factor associated with questionnaire response. All other demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were not associated with response to questionnaires. There were no significant differences in baseline or follow-up quality of life scores between patients treated with surgical intervention or nonoperative management. Conclusions. Death during the study period was a significant factor in limiting adequate follow-up assessment. Future studies attempting to obtain follow-up data on patients evaluated for palliative surgical intervention may require larger patient numbers to account for frequent early death in this population and anticipate the need to account for the high rate of missing data in statistical analysis.",
author = "Brian Badgwell and Robert Krouse and Janice Cormier and Caesar Guevara and Vicki Klimberg and Betty Ferrell",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-012-2420-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "3651--3658",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Frequent and early death limits quality of life assessment in patients with advanced malignancies evaluated for palliative surgical intervention

AU - Badgwell, Brian

AU - Krouse, Robert

AU - Cormier, Janice

AU - Guevara, Caesar

AU - Klimberg, Vicki

AU - Ferrell, Betty

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Background. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and optimal timing of quality of life assessment for patients undergoing palliative surgical evaluation. Methods. Patients with an advanced malignancy undergoing consultation for palliative surgical intervention were prospectively enrolled from November 2009 to January 2011. Follow-up quality of life assessment was performed using validated instruments at 1 and 3 months postenrollment. Univariate analysis of variables was performed to identify clinicopathologic variables associated with questionnaire completion. Results. Of 77 patients enrolled, the most common clinical presentations included bowel obstruction (32 %), abdominal pain (21 %), wound complications (18 %), and gastrointestinal bleeding (11 %). Of the 77 patients, 34 (44 %) were treated with nonoperative/nonprocedural care, 9 (12 %) with endoscopic or interventional radiologic procedures, and 34 (44 %) with surgery. Follow-up questionnaires were obtained at 1 month and 3 months in 48 % and 15 %, respectively. A total of 31 patients (40 %) died prior to study completion. On univariate analysis, death was the only factor associated with questionnaire response. All other demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were not associated with response to questionnaires. There were no significant differences in baseline or follow-up quality of life scores between patients treated with surgical intervention or nonoperative management. Conclusions. Death during the study period was a significant factor in limiting adequate follow-up assessment. Future studies attempting to obtain follow-up data on patients evaluated for palliative surgical intervention may require larger patient numbers to account for frequent early death in this population and anticipate the need to account for the high rate of missing data in statistical analysis.

AB - Background. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and optimal timing of quality of life assessment for patients undergoing palliative surgical evaluation. Methods. Patients with an advanced malignancy undergoing consultation for palliative surgical intervention were prospectively enrolled from November 2009 to January 2011. Follow-up quality of life assessment was performed using validated instruments at 1 and 3 months postenrollment. Univariate analysis of variables was performed to identify clinicopathologic variables associated with questionnaire completion. Results. Of 77 patients enrolled, the most common clinical presentations included bowel obstruction (32 %), abdominal pain (21 %), wound complications (18 %), and gastrointestinal bleeding (11 %). Of the 77 patients, 34 (44 %) were treated with nonoperative/nonprocedural care, 9 (12 %) with endoscopic or interventional radiologic procedures, and 34 (44 %) with surgery. Follow-up questionnaires were obtained at 1 month and 3 months in 48 % and 15 %, respectively. A total of 31 patients (40 %) died prior to study completion. On univariate analysis, death was the only factor associated with questionnaire response. All other demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were not associated with response to questionnaires. There were no significant differences in baseline or follow-up quality of life scores between patients treated with surgical intervention or nonoperative management. Conclusions. Death during the study period was a significant factor in limiting adequate follow-up assessment. Future studies attempting to obtain follow-up data on patients evaluated for palliative surgical intervention may require larger patient numbers to account for frequent early death in this population and anticipate the need to account for the high rate of missing data in statistical analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868106403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868106403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-012-2420-5

DO - 10.1245/s10434-012-2420-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 22669450

AN - SCOPUS:84868106403

VL - 19

SP - 3651

EP - 3658

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

IS - 12

ER -