From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine

Connecting the dots

Bradley K. Weiner, Joseph Fernandez-Moure, Ennio Tasciotti, Mohammadali Mohajel Shoja

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

In this chapter, an attempt is made to highlight the differences between evolutionaryand revolutionary hypotheses. Most hypotheses about etiology or novel therapies areevolutionary in nature and advance the field of medicine incrementally. Revolutionaryhypotheses, on the other hand, are received with skepticism, but they advance thefield enormously if corroborated. Viewing truly revolutionary hypotheses from anevolutionary perspective is misguided and dangerous. If an unusual hypothesis ispresented reasonably, is founded upon solid science, and addresses important aspects ofpathology that currently lack a clear explanation or solution; then it should be listened toand given a reasonable consideration. Medical hypotheses and evidence-based medicinerepresent a continuum, one complementing the other, and any separation between the tworemains artificial as far as the patient care and advancement of knowledge are concerned.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHypotheses in Clinical Medicine
PublisherNova Science Publishers, Inc.
Pages1-8
Number of pages8
ISBN (Print)9781622572762
StatePublished - Dec 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Patient Care
Medicine
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Weiner, B. K., Fernandez-Moure, J., Tasciotti, E., & Mohajel Shoja, M. (2013). From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine: Connecting the dots. In Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine (pp. 1-8). Nova Science Publishers, Inc..

From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine : Connecting the dots. / Weiner, Bradley K.; Fernandez-Moure, Joseph; Tasciotti, Ennio; Mohajel Shoja, Mohammadali.

Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2013. p. 1-8.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Weiner, BK, Fernandez-Moure, J, Tasciotti, E & Mohajel Shoja, M 2013, From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine: Connecting the dots. in Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp. 1-8.
Weiner BK, Fernandez-Moure J, Tasciotti E, Mohajel Shoja M. From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine: Connecting the dots. In Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2013. p. 1-8
Weiner, Bradley K. ; Fernandez-Moure, Joseph ; Tasciotti, Ennio ; Mohajel Shoja, Mohammadali. / From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine : Connecting the dots. Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2013. pp. 1-8
@inbook{86d8a92a3d574fcda3beb7179d56741f,
title = "From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine: Connecting the dots",
abstract = "In this chapter, an attempt is made to highlight the differences between evolutionaryand revolutionary hypotheses. Most hypotheses about etiology or novel therapies areevolutionary in nature and advance the field of medicine incrementally. Revolutionaryhypotheses, on the other hand, are received with skepticism, but they advance thefield enormously if corroborated. Viewing truly revolutionary hypotheses from anevolutionary perspective is misguided and dangerous. If an unusual hypothesis ispresented reasonably, is founded upon solid science, and addresses important aspects ofpathology that currently lack a clear explanation or solution; then it should be listened toand given a reasonable consideration. Medical hypotheses and evidence-based medicinerepresent a continuum, one complementing the other, and any separation between the tworemains artificial as far as the patient care and advancement of knowledge are concerned.",
author = "Weiner, {Bradley K.} and Joseph Fernandez-Moure and Ennio Tasciotti and {Mohajel Shoja}, Mohammadali",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781622572762",
pages = "1--8",
booktitle = "Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine",
publisher = "Nova Science Publishers, Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - From hypothesis to evidence-based medicine

T2 - Connecting the dots

AU - Weiner, Bradley K.

AU - Fernandez-Moure, Joseph

AU - Tasciotti, Ennio

AU - Mohajel Shoja, Mohammadali

PY - 2013/12/1

Y1 - 2013/12/1

N2 - In this chapter, an attempt is made to highlight the differences between evolutionaryand revolutionary hypotheses. Most hypotheses about etiology or novel therapies areevolutionary in nature and advance the field of medicine incrementally. Revolutionaryhypotheses, on the other hand, are received with skepticism, but they advance thefield enormously if corroborated. Viewing truly revolutionary hypotheses from anevolutionary perspective is misguided and dangerous. If an unusual hypothesis ispresented reasonably, is founded upon solid science, and addresses important aspects ofpathology that currently lack a clear explanation or solution; then it should be listened toand given a reasonable consideration. Medical hypotheses and evidence-based medicinerepresent a continuum, one complementing the other, and any separation between the tworemains artificial as far as the patient care and advancement of knowledge are concerned.

AB - In this chapter, an attempt is made to highlight the differences between evolutionaryand revolutionary hypotheses. Most hypotheses about etiology or novel therapies areevolutionary in nature and advance the field of medicine incrementally. Revolutionaryhypotheses, on the other hand, are received with skepticism, but they advance thefield enormously if corroborated. Viewing truly revolutionary hypotheses from anevolutionary perspective is misguided and dangerous. If an unusual hypothesis ispresented reasonably, is founded upon solid science, and addresses important aspects ofpathology that currently lack a clear explanation or solution; then it should be listened toand given a reasonable consideration. Medical hypotheses and evidence-based medicinerepresent a continuum, one complementing the other, and any separation between the tworemains artificial as far as the patient care and advancement of knowledge are concerned.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895294166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895294166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781622572762

SP - 1

EP - 8

BT - Hypotheses in Clinical Medicine

PB - Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

ER -