TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional and Taxonomic Dysbiosis of the Gut, Urine, and Semen Microbiomes in Male Infertility[Formula presented]
AU - Lundy, Scott D.
AU - Sangwan, Naseer
AU - Parekh, Neel V.
AU - Selvam, Manesh Kumar Panner
AU - Gupta, Sajal
AU - McCaffrey, Peter
AU - Bessoff, Kovi
AU - Vala, Ayin
AU - Agarwal, Ashok
AU - Sabanegh, Edmund S.
AU - Vij, Sarah C.
AU - Eng, Charis
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding/Support and role of the sponsor: This study was supported by the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Research Program Committee Grant . The authors assert that Vastbiome had no influence over the study design or data collection for these experiments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Little is known about the role of the genitourinary and gastrointestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of male infertility. Objective: To compare the taxonomic and functional profiles of the gut, semen, and urine microbiomes of infertile and fertile men. Design, setting, and participants: We prospectively enrolled 25 men with primary idiopathic infertility and 12 healthy men with proven paternity, and we collected rectal swabs, semen samples, midstream urine specimens, and experimental controls. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We performed comprehensive semen analysis, 16S rRNA sequencing for quantitative high-resolution taxonomy, and shotgun metagenomics with a median of 140 million reads per sample for functional metabolic pathway profiling. Results and limitations: We identified a diverse semen microbiome with modest similarity to the urinary microbiome. Infertile men harbored increased seminal α-diversity and distinct β-diversity, increased seminal Aerococcus, and decreased rectal Anaerococcus. Prevotella abundance was inversely associated with sperm concentration, and Pseudomonas was directly associated with total motile sperm count. Vasectomy appeared to alter the seminal microbiome, suggesting a testicular or epididymal contribution. Anaerobes were highly over-represented in the semen of infertile men with a varicocele, but oxidative stress and leukocytospermia were associated with only subtle differences. Metagenomics data identified significant alterations in the S-adenosyl-L-methionine cycle, which may play a multifaceted role in the pathogenesis of infertility via DNA methylation, oxidative stress, and/or polyamine synthesis. Conclusions: This pilot study represents the first comprehensive investigation into the microbiome in male infertility. These findings provide the foundation for future investigations to explore causality and identify novel microbiome-based diagnostics and therapeutics for men with this complex and emotionally devastating disease. Patient summary: We explored the resident populations of bacteria living in the gut, semen, and urine of infertile and fertile men. We found several important bacterial and metabolic pathway differences with the potential to aid in diagnosing and treating male infertility in the future.
AB - Background: Little is known about the role of the genitourinary and gastrointestinal microbiota in the pathogenesis of male infertility. Objective: To compare the taxonomic and functional profiles of the gut, semen, and urine microbiomes of infertile and fertile men. Design, setting, and participants: We prospectively enrolled 25 men with primary idiopathic infertility and 12 healthy men with proven paternity, and we collected rectal swabs, semen samples, midstream urine specimens, and experimental controls. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We performed comprehensive semen analysis, 16S rRNA sequencing for quantitative high-resolution taxonomy, and shotgun metagenomics with a median of 140 million reads per sample for functional metabolic pathway profiling. Results and limitations: We identified a diverse semen microbiome with modest similarity to the urinary microbiome. Infertile men harbored increased seminal α-diversity and distinct β-diversity, increased seminal Aerococcus, and decreased rectal Anaerococcus. Prevotella abundance was inversely associated with sperm concentration, and Pseudomonas was directly associated with total motile sperm count. Vasectomy appeared to alter the seminal microbiome, suggesting a testicular or epididymal contribution. Anaerobes were highly over-represented in the semen of infertile men with a varicocele, but oxidative stress and leukocytospermia were associated with only subtle differences. Metagenomics data identified significant alterations in the S-adenosyl-L-methionine cycle, which may play a multifaceted role in the pathogenesis of infertility via DNA methylation, oxidative stress, and/or polyamine synthesis. Conclusions: This pilot study represents the first comprehensive investigation into the microbiome in male infertility. These findings provide the foundation for future investigations to explore causality and identify novel microbiome-based diagnostics and therapeutics for men with this complex and emotionally devastating disease. Patient summary: We explored the resident populations of bacteria living in the gut, semen, and urine of infertile and fertile men. We found several important bacterial and metabolic pathway differences with the potential to aid in diagnosing and treating male infertility in the future.
KW - 16S rRNA
KW - Bacteriospermia
KW - Leukocytospermia
KW - Male infertility
KW - Metagenomics
KW - Microbiome
KW - Microbiota
KW - Semen
KW - Seminal oxidative stress
KW - Varicocele
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100645547&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100645547&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.014
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 33573862
AN - SCOPUS:85100645547
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 79
SP - 826
EP - 836
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 6
ER -