Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer

Ann Butler Nattinger, Mark S. Gottlieb, Judith Veum, David Yahnke, James Goodwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

482 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. In the past decade there has been an increase in the use of treatment designed to conserve the breast for women with breast cancer. The extent to which such treatment has been adopted in various regions of the country and whether characteristics of hospitals and patients predict its use are not known, however. Methods. We used national data on Medicare claims for inpatient care provided in 1986 to study 36,982 women 65 to 79 years of age, who had local or regional breast cancer and underwent either mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment (local excision, quadrantectomy, or subtotal mastectomy). Information about the hospitals at which these women were treated was obtained from an American Hospital Association survey. Results. Of the 36,982 women, 12.1 percent had breast-conserving surgery and 87.9 percent had a mastectomy. The frequency of breast-conserving surgery ranged from 3.5 percent to 21.2 percent in various states. The highest rate of use was in the Middle Atlantic states (20.0 percent) and New England (17.2 percent), and the lowest was in the East South Central states (5.9 percent) and the West South Central states (7.3 percent). Breast-conserving treatment was used more often in urban than in rural areas, in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals, in large hospitals than in small hospitals, and in hospitals with on-site radiation therapy or geriatric services than in others. Most of the geographic variation persisted after adjustment for the characteristics of hospitals and patients for which data were available. Conclusions. There is substantial geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving surgery, which cannot be explained by differences in hospital characteristics. Hospital characteristics that were independently predictive of greater use of breast-conserving surgery were the size of the metropolitan area, the status of the institution as a teaching hospital, and the availability of radiation therapy and geriatric services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1102-1107
Number of pages6
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume326
Issue number17
StatePublished - Apr 23 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Segmental Mastectomy
Mastectomy
Therapeutics
Teaching Hospitals
Geriatrics
Mid-Atlantic Region
Radiotherapy
American Hospital Association
New England
Medicare
Inpatients

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Nattinger, A. B., Gottlieb, M. S., Veum, J., Yahnke, D., & Goodwin, J. (1992). Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 326(17), 1102-1107.

Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. / Nattinger, Ann Butler; Gottlieb, Mark S.; Veum, Judith; Yahnke, David; Goodwin, James.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 326, No. 17, 23.04.1992, p. 1102-1107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nattinger, AB, Gottlieb, MS, Veum, J, Yahnke, D & Goodwin, J 1992, 'Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer', New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 326, no. 17, pp. 1102-1107.
Nattinger, Ann Butler ; Gottlieb, Mark S. ; Veum, Judith ; Yahnke, David ; Goodwin, James. / Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 1992 ; Vol. 326, No. 17. pp. 1102-1107.
@article{a18716f6de42417498a348bc5e3938c1,
title = "Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer",
abstract = "Background. In the past decade there has been an increase in the use of treatment designed to conserve the breast for women with breast cancer. The extent to which such treatment has been adopted in various regions of the country and whether characteristics of hospitals and patients predict its use are not known, however. Methods. We used national data on Medicare claims for inpatient care provided in 1986 to study 36,982 women 65 to 79 years of age, who had local or regional breast cancer and underwent either mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment (local excision, quadrantectomy, or subtotal mastectomy). Information about the hospitals at which these women were treated was obtained from an American Hospital Association survey. Results. Of the 36,982 women, 12.1 percent had breast-conserving surgery and 87.9 percent had a mastectomy. The frequency of breast-conserving surgery ranged from 3.5 percent to 21.2 percent in various states. The highest rate of use was in the Middle Atlantic states (20.0 percent) and New England (17.2 percent), and the lowest was in the East South Central states (5.9 percent) and the West South Central states (7.3 percent). Breast-conserving treatment was used more often in urban than in rural areas, in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals, in large hospitals than in small hospitals, and in hospitals with on-site radiation therapy or geriatric services than in others. Most of the geographic variation persisted after adjustment for the characteristics of hospitals and patients for which data were available. Conclusions. There is substantial geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving surgery, which cannot be explained by differences in hospital characteristics. Hospital characteristics that were independently predictive of greater use of breast-conserving surgery were the size of the metropolitan area, the status of the institution as a teaching hospital, and the availability of radiation therapy and geriatric services.",
author = "Nattinger, {Ann Butler} and Gottlieb, {Mark S.} and Judith Veum and David Yahnke and James Goodwin",
year = "1992",
month = "4",
day = "23",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "326",
pages = "1102--1107",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer

AU - Nattinger, Ann Butler

AU - Gottlieb, Mark S.

AU - Veum, Judith

AU - Yahnke, David

AU - Goodwin, James

PY - 1992/4/23

Y1 - 1992/4/23

N2 - Background. In the past decade there has been an increase in the use of treatment designed to conserve the breast for women with breast cancer. The extent to which such treatment has been adopted in various regions of the country and whether characteristics of hospitals and patients predict its use are not known, however. Methods. We used national data on Medicare claims for inpatient care provided in 1986 to study 36,982 women 65 to 79 years of age, who had local or regional breast cancer and underwent either mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment (local excision, quadrantectomy, or subtotal mastectomy). Information about the hospitals at which these women were treated was obtained from an American Hospital Association survey. Results. Of the 36,982 women, 12.1 percent had breast-conserving surgery and 87.9 percent had a mastectomy. The frequency of breast-conserving surgery ranged from 3.5 percent to 21.2 percent in various states. The highest rate of use was in the Middle Atlantic states (20.0 percent) and New England (17.2 percent), and the lowest was in the East South Central states (5.9 percent) and the West South Central states (7.3 percent). Breast-conserving treatment was used more often in urban than in rural areas, in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals, in large hospitals than in small hospitals, and in hospitals with on-site radiation therapy or geriatric services than in others. Most of the geographic variation persisted after adjustment for the characteristics of hospitals and patients for which data were available. Conclusions. There is substantial geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving surgery, which cannot be explained by differences in hospital characteristics. Hospital characteristics that were independently predictive of greater use of breast-conserving surgery were the size of the metropolitan area, the status of the institution as a teaching hospital, and the availability of radiation therapy and geriatric services.

AB - Background. In the past decade there has been an increase in the use of treatment designed to conserve the breast for women with breast cancer. The extent to which such treatment has been adopted in various regions of the country and whether characteristics of hospitals and patients predict its use are not known, however. Methods. We used national data on Medicare claims for inpatient care provided in 1986 to study 36,982 women 65 to 79 years of age, who had local or regional breast cancer and underwent either mastectomy or breast-conserving treatment (local excision, quadrantectomy, or subtotal mastectomy). Information about the hospitals at which these women were treated was obtained from an American Hospital Association survey. Results. Of the 36,982 women, 12.1 percent had breast-conserving surgery and 87.9 percent had a mastectomy. The frequency of breast-conserving surgery ranged from 3.5 percent to 21.2 percent in various states. The highest rate of use was in the Middle Atlantic states (20.0 percent) and New England (17.2 percent), and the lowest was in the East South Central states (5.9 percent) and the West South Central states (7.3 percent). Breast-conserving treatment was used more often in urban than in rural areas, in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals, in large hospitals than in small hospitals, and in hospitals with on-site radiation therapy or geriatric services than in others. Most of the geographic variation persisted after adjustment for the characteristics of hospitals and patients for which data were available. Conclusions. There is substantial geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving surgery, which cannot be explained by differences in hospital characteristics. Hospital characteristics that were independently predictive of greater use of breast-conserving surgery were the size of the metropolitan area, the status of the institution as a teaching hospital, and the availability of radiation therapy and geriatric services.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026538046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026538046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 326

SP - 1102

EP - 1107

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 17

ER -