Global Surgery: Effective Involvement of US Academic Surgery: Report of the American Surgical Association Working Group on Global Surgery

Charles Mock, Haile Debas, Charles M. Balch, Murray Brennan, Jo Buyske, James Cusack, Steven DeMeester, David Herndon, Ai Xuan Le Holterman, Bernard Jaffe, Emad Kandil, Gordon Kauffman, George Mazariegos, Nipun sMerchant, Patricia Numann, Dmitry Oleynikov, Oluyinka Olutoye, James O'Neill, Steven Shackford, Peter StockJohn L. Tarpley, Todd Tuttle, Steven Wolf, Sherry M. Wren, George P. Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

: There is an unacceptably high burden of death and disability from conditions that are treatable by surgery, worldwide and especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The major actions to improve this situation need to be taken by the surgical communities, institutions, and governments of the LMICs. The US surgical community, including the US academic surgical community, has, however, important roles to play in addressing this problem. The American Surgical Association convened a Working Group to address how US academic surgery can most effectively decrease the burden from surgically treatable conditions in LMICs. The Working Group believes that the task will be most successful (1) if the epidemiologic pattern in a given country is taken into account by focusing on those surgically treatable conditions with the highest burdens; (2) if emphasis is placed on those surgical services that are most cost-effective and most feasible to scale up; and (3) if efforts are harmonized with local priorities and with existing global initiatives, such as the World Health Assembly with its 2015 resolution on essential surgery. This consensus statement gives recommendations on how to achieve those goals through the tools of academic surgery: clinical care, training and capacity building, research, and advocacy. Through all of these, the ethical principles of maximally and transparently engaging with and deferring to the interests and needs of local surgeons and their patients are of paramount importance. Notable benefits accrue to US surgeons, trainees, and institutions that engage in global surgical activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-563
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume268
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Capacity Building
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research
Surgeons
Global Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Global Surgery : Effective Involvement of US Academic Surgery: Report of the American Surgical Association Working Group on Global Surgery. / Mock, Charles; Debas, Haile; Balch, Charles M.; Brennan, Murray; Buyske, Jo; Cusack, James; DeMeester, Steven; Herndon, David; Le Holterman, Ai Xuan; Jaffe, Bernard; Kandil, Emad; Kauffman, Gordon; Mazariegos, George; sMerchant, Nipun; Numann, Patricia; Oleynikov, Dmitry; Olutoye, Oluyinka; O'Neill, James; Shackford, Steven; Stock, Peter; Tarpley, John L.; Tuttle, Todd; Wolf, Steven; Wren, Sherry M.; Yang, George P.

In: Annals of surgery, Vol. 268, No. 4, 01.10.2018, p. 557-563.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mock, C, Debas, H, Balch, CM, Brennan, M, Buyske, J, Cusack, J, DeMeester, S, Herndon, D, Le Holterman, AX, Jaffe, B, Kandil, E, Kauffman, G, Mazariegos, G, sMerchant, N, Numann, P, Oleynikov, D, Olutoye, O, O'Neill, J, Shackford, S, Stock, P, Tarpley, JL, Tuttle, T, Wolf, S, Wren, SM & Yang, GP 2018, 'Global Surgery: Effective Involvement of US Academic Surgery: Report of the American Surgical Association Working Group on Global Surgery', Annals of surgery, vol. 268, no. 4, pp. 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002934
Mock, Charles ; Debas, Haile ; Balch, Charles M. ; Brennan, Murray ; Buyske, Jo ; Cusack, James ; DeMeester, Steven ; Herndon, David ; Le Holterman, Ai Xuan ; Jaffe, Bernard ; Kandil, Emad ; Kauffman, Gordon ; Mazariegos, George ; sMerchant, Nipun ; Numann, Patricia ; Oleynikov, Dmitry ; Olutoye, Oluyinka ; O'Neill, James ; Shackford, Steven ; Stock, Peter ; Tarpley, John L. ; Tuttle, Todd ; Wolf, Steven ; Wren, Sherry M. ; Yang, George P. / Global Surgery : Effective Involvement of US Academic Surgery: Report of the American Surgical Association Working Group on Global Surgery. In: Annals of surgery. 2018 ; Vol. 268, No. 4. pp. 557-563.
@article{df3ee76bf2ae46a3b0074426cae59469,
title = "Global Surgery: Effective Involvement of US Academic Surgery: Report of the American Surgical Association Working Group on Global Surgery",
abstract = ": There is an unacceptably high burden of death and disability from conditions that are treatable by surgery, worldwide and especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The major actions to improve this situation need to be taken by the surgical communities, institutions, and governments of the LMICs. The US surgical community, including the US academic surgical community, has, however, important roles to play in addressing this problem. The American Surgical Association convened a Working Group to address how US academic surgery can most effectively decrease the burden from surgically treatable conditions in LMICs. The Working Group believes that the task will be most successful (1) if the epidemiologic pattern in a given country is taken into account by focusing on those surgically treatable conditions with the highest burdens; (2) if emphasis is placed on those surgical services that are most cost-effective and most feasible to scale up; and (3) if efforts are harmonized with local priorities and with existing global initiatives, such as the World Health Assembly with its 2015 resolution on essential surgery. This consensus statement gives recommendations on how to achieve those goals through the tools of academic surgery: clinical care, training and capacity building, research, and advocacy. Through all of these, the ethical principles of maximally and transparently engaging with and deferring to the interests and needs of local surgeons and their patients are of paramount importance. Notable benefits accrue to US surgeons, trainees, and institutions that engage in global surgical activities.",
author = "Charles Mock and Haile Debas and Balch, {Charles M.} and Murray Brennan and Jo Buyske and James Cusack and Steven DeMeester and David Herndon and {Le Holterman}, {Ai Xuan} and Bernard Jaffe and Emad Kandil and Gordon Kauffman and George Mazariegos and Nipun sMerchant and Patricia Numann and Dmitry Oleynikov and Oluyinka Olutoye and James O'Neill and Steven Shackford and Peter Stock and Tarpley, {John L.} and Todd Tuttle and Steven Wolf and Wren, {Sherry M.} and Yang, {George P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0000000000002934",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "268",
pages = "557--563",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global Surgery

T2 - Effective Involvement of US Academic Surgery: Report of the American Surgical Association Working Group on Global Surgery

AU - Mock, Charles

AU - Debas, Haile

AU - Balch, Charles M.

AU - Brennan, Murray

AU - Buyske, Jo

AU - Cusack, James

AU - DeMeester, Steven

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Le Holterman, Ai Xuan

AU - Jaffe, Bernard

AU - Kandil, Emad

AU - Kauffman, Gordon

AU - Mazariegos, George

AU - sMerchant, Nipun

AU - Numann, Patricia

AU - Oleynikov, Dmitry

AU - Olutoye, Oluyinka

AU - O'Neill, James

AU - Shackford, Steven

AU - Stock, Peter

AU - Tarpley, John L.

AU - Tuttle, Todd

AU - Wolf, Steven

AU - Wren, Sherry M.

AU - Yang, George P.

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - : There is an unacceptably high burden of death and disability from conditions that are treatable by surgery, worldwide and especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The major actions to improve this situation need to be taken by the surgical communities, institutions, and governments of the LMICs. The US surgical community, including the US academic surgical community, has, however, important roles to play in addressing this problem. The American Surgical Association convened a Working Group to address how US academic surgery can most effectively decrease the burden from surgically treatable conditions in LMICs. The Working Group believes that the task will be most successful (1) if the epidemiologic pattern in a given country is taken into account by focusing on those surgically treatable conditions with the highest burdens; (2) if emphasis is placed on those surgical services that are most cost-effective and most feasible to scale up; and (3) if efforts are harmonized with local priorities and with existing global initiatives, such as the World Health Assembly with its 2015 resolution on essential surgery. This consensus statement gives recommendations on how to achieve those goals through the tools of academic surgery: clinical care, training and capacity building, research, and advocacy. Through all of these, the ethical principles of maximally and transparently engaging with and deferring to the interests and needs of local surgeons and their patients are of paramount importance. Notable benefits accrue to US surgeons, trainees, and institutions that engage in global surgical activities.

AB - : There is an unacceptably high burden of death and disability from conditions that are treatable by surgery, worldwide and especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The major actions to improve this situation need to be taken by the surgical communities, institutions, and governments of the LMICs. The US surgical community, including the US academic surgical community, has, however, important roles to play in addressing this problem. The American Surgical Association convened a Working Group to address how US academic surgery can most effectively decrease the burden from surgically treatable conditions in LMICs. The Working Group believes that the task will be most successful (1) if the epidemiologic pattern in a given country is taken into account by focusing on those surgically treatable conditions with the highest burdens; (2) if emphasis is placed on those surgical services that are most cost-effective and most feasible to scale up; and (3) if efforts are harmonized with local priorities and with existing global initiatives, such as the World Health Assembly with its 2015 resolution on essential surgery. This consensus statement gives recommendations on how to achieve those goals through the tools of academic surgery: clinical care, training and capacity building, research, and advocacy. Through all of these, the ethical principles of maximally and transparently engaging with and deferring to the interests and needs of local surgeons and their patients are of paramount importance. Notable benefits accrue to US surgeons, trainees, and institutions that engage in global surgical activities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069763170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069763170&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002934

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002934

M3 - Article

C2 - 30004921

AN - SCOPUS:85069763170

VL - 268

SP - 557

EP - 563

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 4

ER -