Hand-hygiene compliance does not predict rates of resistant infections in critically ill surgical patients

Sudha P. Jayaraman, Michael Klompas, Molli Bascom, Xiaoxia Liu, Regina Piszcz, Selwyn O. Rogers, Reza Askari

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Background: Our institution had a major outbreak of multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter (MDRA) in its general surgical and trauma intensive care units (ICUs) in 2011, requiring implementation of an aggressive infection-control response. We hypothesized that poor hand-hygiene compliance (HHC) may have contributed to the outbreak of MDRA. A response to the outbreak including aggressive environmental cleaning, cohorting, and increased hand hygiene compliance monitoring may have led to an increase in HHC after the outbreak and to a consequent decrease in the rates of infection by the nosocomial pathogens methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), and Clostridium difficile.

    Methods: Hand-hygiene compliance, tracked in monthly audits by trained and anonymous observers, was abstracted from an infection control database. The incidences of nosocomial MRSA, VRE, and C. difficile were calculated from a separate prospectively collected data base for 6 mo before and 12 mo after the 2011 outbreak of MDRA in the institution's general surgical and trauma ICUs, and data collected prospectively from two unaffected ICUs (the thoracic surgical ICU and medical intensive care unit [MICU]). We created a composite endpoint of "any resistant pathogen," defined as MRSA, VRE, or C. difficile, and compared incidence rates over time, using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient to measure the correlations among these rates.

    Results: Rates of HHC before and after the outbreak of MDRA were consistently high in both the general surgical (median rates: 100% before and 97.6% after the outbreak, p=0.93) and trauma ICUs (median rates: 90% before and 96.75% after the outbreak, p=0.14). In none of the ICUs included in the study did the rates of HHC increase in response to the outbreak of MDRA. The incidence of "any resistant pathogen" decreased in the general surgical ICU after the outbreak (from 6.7/1,000 patient-days before the outbreak to 2.7/1,000 patient-days after the outbreak, p=0.04), but this decrease did not correlate with HHC (trauma ICU: Pearson correlation [ρ]=-0.34, p=0.28; general surgical ICU: ρ=0.52, p=0.08).

    Conclusions: The 2011 outbreak of MDRA at our institution occurred despite high rates of HHC. Notwithstanding stable rates of HHC, the rates of infection with MRSA, VRE and C. difficile decreased in the general surgical ICU after the outbreak. This suggests that infection control tactics other than HHC play a crucial role in preventing the transmission of nosocomial pathogens, especially when rates of HHC have been maximized.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)533-539
    Number of pages7
    JournalSurgical Infections
    Volume15
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2014

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Surgery
    • Microbiology (medical)
    • Infectious Diseases

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Hand-hygiene compliance does not predict rates of resistant infections in critically ill surgical patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Jayaraman, S. P., Klompas, M., Bascom, M., Liu, X., Piszcz, R., Rogers, S. O., & Askari, R. (2014). Hand-hygiene compliance does not predict rates of resistant infections in critically ill surgical patients. Surgical Infections, 15(5), 533-539. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2013.128