TY - JOUR
T1 - Hearing outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment in adults
T2 - a scoping review
AU - Hill-Feltham, Penny R.
AU - Johansson, Martin L.
AU - Hodgetts, William E.
AU - Ostevik, Amberley V.
AU - McKinnon, Brian J.
AU - Monksfield, Peter
AU - Sockalingam, Ravi
AU - Wright, Tracy
AU - Tysome, James R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objective: Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area. Design: Scoping review. Study Sample: Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss. Results: The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery. Conclusions: A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research.
AB - Objective: Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area. Design: Scoping review. Study Sample: Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss. Results: The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery. Conclusions: A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research.
KW - Mixed hearing loss
KW - conductive hearing loss
KW - outcome measures
KW - review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091614402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091614402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14992027.2020.1820087
DO - 10.1080/14992027.2020.1820087
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32985284
AN - SCOPUS:85091614402
SN - 1499-2027
VL - 60
SP - 239
EP - 245
JO - International Journal of Audiology
JF - International Journal of Audiology
IS - 4
ER -