Hemorrhoids

What are the options in 2018?

Danny O. Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose of review Efforts continue to improve the treatment of patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease by interventions designed to improve efficiency and effectiveness, including by reducing intraoperative and postoperative pain, decreasing operating times, minimizing blood loss and controlling symptoms and recurrence rates. Simultaneously, there are also renewed efforts to minimize the number of patients who will require procedural intervention by focusing on conservative measures that encourage better bowel regulation and habits. The purpose of this brief report is to review the current status of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Overall, new procedures or procedural refinements to existing techniques continue to be introduced with promising short-term outcomes - at least in some instances. In most instances, long-term follow-up or equivalency data are still being accumulated such that a definitive, unequivocal answer to what is truly the best alternative to traditional hemorrhoidectomy remains controversial. One of the challenges is heterogeneity as regards diagnosis, intervention and, especially, outcomes measures such that comparing therapies is too difficult. A recent initiative to standardize metrics has promise. Recent findings Recent studies largely appear to suggest that conservative treatment approaches and managing patient expectations are critically important in which a primary objective should be to minimize the progression to symptomatic disease and complications in patients who are diagnosed with hemorrhoids. The pace of change as regards the development of new or improved surgical techniques appears may be accelerating. Summary Progress is being made and the knowledge base is being expanded as regards the treatment options for patients with hemorrhoids and expected outcomes. A key initiative to standardize the approaches to diagnosis and treatment about staging, procedural interventions and outcomes will facilitate comparative analytics, if successful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-49
Number of pages4
JournalCurrent Opinion in Gastroenterology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Hemorrhoids
Hemorrhoidectomy
Therapeutics
Knowledge Bases
Postoperative Pain
Habits
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Recurrence

Keywords

  • hemorrhoids
  • new therapies
  • outcomes
  • treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Hemorrhoids : What are the options in 2018? / Jacobs, Danny O.

In: Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 46-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Jacobs, Danny O. / Hemorrhoids : What are the options in 2018?. In: Current Opinion in Gastroenterology. 2018 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 46-49.
@article{76812f906852448495b7318db3e3eee2,
title = "Hemorrhoids: What are the options in 2018?",
abstract = "Purpose of review Efforts continue to improve the treatment of patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease by interventions designed to improve efficiency and effectiveness, including by reducing intraoperative and postoperative pain, decreasing operating times, minimizing blood loss and controlling symptoms and recurrence rates. Simultaneously, there are also renewed efforts to minimize the number of patients who will require procedural intervention by focusing on conservative measures that encourage better bowel regulation and habits. The purpose of this brief report is to review the current status of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Overall, new procedures or procedural refinements to existing techniques continue to be introduced with promising short-term outcomes - at least in some instances. In most instances, long-term follow-up or equivalency data are still being accumulated such that a definitive, unequivocal answer to what is truly the best alternative to traditional hemorrhoidectomy remains controversial. One of the challenges is heterogeneity as regards diagnosis, intervention and, especially, outcomes measures such that comparing therapies is too difficult. A recent initiative to standardize metrics has promise. Recent findings Recent studies largely appear to suggest that conservative treatment approaches and managing patient expectations are critically important in which a primary objective should be to minimize the progression to symptomatic disease and complications in patients who are diagnosed with hemorrhoids. The pace of change as regards the development of new or improved surgical techniques appears may be accelerating. Summary Progress is being made and the knowledge base is being expanded as regards the treatment options for patients with hemorrhoids and expected outcomes. A key initiative to standardize the approaches to diagnosis and treatment about staging, procedural interventions and outcomes will facilitate comparative analytics, if successful.",
keywords = "hemorrhoids, new therapies, outcomes, treatment",
author = "Jacobs, {Danny O.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MOG.0000000000000408",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "46--49",
journal = "Current Opinion in Gastroenterology",
issn = "0267-1379",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hemorrhoids

T2 - What are the options in 2018?

AU - Jacobs, Danny O.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose of review Efforts continue to improve the treatment of patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease by interventions designed to improve efficiency and effectiveness, including by reducing intraoperative and postoperative pain, decreasing operating times, minimizing blood loss and controlling symptoms and recurrence rates. Simultaneously, there are also renewed efforts to minimize the number of patients who will require procedural intervention by focusing on conservative measures that encourage better bowel regulation and habits. The purpose of this brief report is to review the current status of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Overall, new procedures or procedural refinements to existing techniques continue to be introduced with promising short-term outcomes - at least in some instances. In most instances, long-term follow-up or equivalency data are still being accumulated such that a definitive, unequivocal answer to what is truly the best alternative to traditional hemorrhoidectomy remains controversial. One of the challenges is heterogeneity as regards diagnosis, intervention and, especially, outcomes measures such that comparing therapies is too difficult. A recent initiative to standardize metrics has promise. Recent findings Recent studies largely appear to suggest that conservative treatment approaches and managing patient expectations are critically important in which a primary objective should be to minimize the progression to symptomatic disease and complications in patients who are diagnosed with hemorrhoids. The pace of change as regards the development of new or improved surgical techniques appears may be accelerating. Summary Progress is being made and the knowledge base is being expanded as regards the treatment options for patients with hemorrhoids and expected outcomes. A key initiative to standardize the approaches to diagnosis and treatment about staging, procedural interventions and outcomes will facilitate comparative analytics, if successful.

AB - Purpose of review Efforts continue to improve the treatment of patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease by interventions designed to improve efficiency and effectiveness, including by reducing intraoperative and postoperative pain, decreasing operating times, minimizing blood loss and controlling symptoms and recurrence rates. Simultaneously, there are also renewed efforts to minimize the number of patients who will require procedural intervention by focusing on conservative measures that encourage better bowel regulation and habits. The purpose of this brief report is to review the current status of the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Overall, new procedures or procedural refinements to existing techniques continue to be introduced with promising short-term outcomes - at least in some instances. In most instances, long-term follow-up or equivalency data are still being accumulated such that a definitive, unequivocal answer to what is truly the best alternative to traditional hemorrhoidectomy remains controversial. One of the challenges is heterogeneity as regards diagnosis, intervention and, especially, outcomes measures such that comparing therapies is too difficult. A recent initiative to standardize metrics has promise. Recent findings Recent studies largely appear to suggest that conservative treatment approaches and managing patient expectations are critically important in which a primary objective should be to minimize the progression to symptomatic disease and complications in patients who are diagnosed with hemorrhoids. The pace of change as regards the development of new or improved surgical techniques appears may be accelerating. Summary Progress is being made and the knowledge base is being expanded as regards the treatment options for patients with hemorrhoids and expected outcomes. A key initiative to standardize the approaches to diagnosis and treatment about staging, procedural interventions and outcomes will facilitate comparative analytics, if successful.

KW - hemorrhoids

KW - new therapies

KW - outcomes

KW - treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036646694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036646694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000408

DO - 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000408

M3 - Review article

VL - 34

SP - 46

EP - 49

JO - Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

JF - Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

SN - 0267-1379

IS - 1

ER -