TY - JOUR
T1 - High Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) with Recruitment Maneuvers versus Low PEEP during General Anesthesia for Surgery
T2 - A Bayesian Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Three Randomized Clinical Trials
AU - PROVHILO, iPROVE, and PROBESE investigators and the PROVE Network investigators
AU - Mazzinari, Guido
AU - Zampieri, Fernando G.
AU - Ball, Lorenzo
AU - Campos, Niklas S.
AU - Bluth, Thomas
AU - Hemmes, Sabrine N.T.
AU - Ferrando, Carlos
AU - Librero, Julián
AU - Soro, Marina
AU - Pelosi, Paolo
AU - De Abreu, Marcelo Gama
AU - Schultz, Marcus J.
AU - Serpa Neto, Ary
AU - Pozo, Natividad
AU - Severgnini, Paolo
AU - Hollmann, Markus W.
AU - Binnekade, Jan M.
AU - Wrigge, Hermann
AU - Canet, Jaume
AU - Hiesmayr, Michael
AU - Schmid, Werner
AU - Tschernko, Edda
AU - Jaber, Samir
AU - Hedenstierna, Göran
AU - Putensen, Christian
AU - Marti, Agnes
AU - Bacuzzi, Alessandro
AU - Brodhun, Alexander
AU - Molin, Alexandre
AU - Merten, Alfred
AU - Parera, Ana
AU - Brunelli, Andrea
AU - Cortegiani, Andrea
AU - Güldner, Andreas
AU - Reske, Andreas W.
AU - Gratarola, Angelo
AU - Giarratano, Antonino
AU - Bastin, Bea
AU - Heyse, Bjorn
AU - Mazul-Sunko, Branka
AU - Amantea, Bruno
AU - Barberis, Bruno
AU - Uhlig, Christopher
AU - Marín, Conrado Minguez
AU - Celentano, Cristian
AU - La Bella, Daniela
AU - D'Antini, David
AU - Velghe, David
AU - Sulemanji, Demet
AU - Vidal Melo, Marcos F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2024 American Society of Anesthesiologists. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Background: The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. The objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect. Methods: Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis was performed on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at intermediate to high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. This study examined the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus low PEEP ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect. Results: Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio for high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to low PEEP was 0.85 (95% credible interval, 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (odds ratio, 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results. Conclusions: High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of postoperative pulmonary complication occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.
AB - Background: The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. The objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect. Methods: Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis was performed on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at intermediate to high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. This study examined the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus low PEEP ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect. Results: Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio for high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to low PEEP was 0.85 (95% credible interval, 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (odds ratio, 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (odds ratio, 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results. Conclusions: High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of postoperative pulmonary complication occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200469186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200469186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005170
DO - 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005170
M3 - Article
C2 - 39042027
AN - SCOPUS:85200469186
SN - 0003-3022
VL - 142
SP - 72
EP - 97
JO - Anesthesiology
JF - Anesthesiology
IS - 1
ER -