Home apnea monitoring and sudden infant death syndrome

Michael Malloy, Howard J. Hoffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To estimate the U.S. national prevalence of apnea monitor use by birth weight classification and to examine the relationship between the use of apnea monitors and the occurrence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Design and setting. Data obtained from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) were used. Prevalence estimates of apnea monitor use were obtained by weighting survey data, and the relationship between monitor use and SIDS was accomplished by a case-control analysis using SIDS deaths and live controls obtained from the NMIHS. Outcome measure. Weighted estimates of the prevalence of apnea monitor use and odds ratios for the odds of use of an apnea monitor among SIDS victims compared with the odds of use of an apnea monitor among living controls. Results. The national prevalence estimates for home apnea monitor use among birth weight strata of 500 to 1,499 g, 1,500 to 2,499 g, and 2,500 g or more for blacks were 19.9, 2.6, and 1.1% compared with 44.0, 8.8, and 1.2% for non-blacks. The only significant association between the use of apnea monitors and SIDS was for black 500- to 1,499-g infants. The adjusted odds ratio for SIDS among monitored black 500- to 1,499-g infants vs unmonitored infants was 3.93 (1.09, 14.17). Conclusions. This analysis suggests a marked difference in reported monitor use between U.S. black and non-black infants. In addition, black very low birth weight infants at highest risk for SIDS appear to be preferentially selected for monitoring. The protective effect of home apnea monitoring in this survey population is unclear.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-649
Number of pages5
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1996

Fingerprint

Sudden Infant Death
Apnea
Health Surveys
Birth Weight
Odds Ratio
Very Low Birth Weight Infant
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • apnea monitor
  • race
  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Home apnea monitoring and sudden infant death syndrome. / Malloy, Michael; Hoffman, Howard J.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 25, No. 6, 11.1996, p. 645-649.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Malloy, Michael ; Hoffman, Howard J. / Home apnea monitoring and sudden infant death syndrome. In: Preventive Medicine. 1996 ; Vol. 25, No. 6. pp. 645-649.
@article{d472326736614440a809f07dd2cefa7e,
title = "Home apnea monitoring and sudden infant death syndrome",
abstract = "Objective. To estimate the U.S. national prevalence of apnea monitor use by birth weight classification and to examine the relationship between the use of apnea monitors and the occurrence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Design and setting. Data obtained from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) were used. Prevalence estimates of apnea monitor use were obtained by weighting survey data, and the relationship between monitor use and SIDS was accomplished by a case-control analysis using SIDS deaths and live controls obtained from the NMIHS. Outcome measure. Weighted estimates of the prevalence of apnea monitor use and odds ratios for the odds of use of an apnea monitor among SIDS victims compared with the odds of use of an apnea monitor among living controls. Results. The national prevalence estimates for home apnea monitor use among birth weight strata of 500 to 1,499 g, 1,500 to 2,499 g, and 2,500 g or more for blacks were 19.9, 2.6, and 1.1{\%} compared with 44.0, 8.8, and 1.2{\%} for non-blacks. The only significant association between the use of apnea monitors and SIDS was for black 500- to 1,499-g infants. The adjusted odds ratio for SIDS among monitored black 500- to 1,499-g infants vs unmonitored infants was 3.93 (1.09, 14.17). Conclusions. This analysis suggests a marked difference in reported monitor use between U.S. black and non-black infants. In addition, black very low birth weight infants at highest risk for SIDS appear to be preferentially selected for monitoring. The protective effect of home apnea monitoring in this survey population is unclear.",
keywords = "apnea monitor, race, Sudden Infant Death Syndrome",
author = "Michael Malloy and Hoffman, {Howard J.}",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1006/pmed.1996.9998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "645--649",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Home apnea monitoring and sudden infant death syndrome

AU - Malloy, Michael

AU - Hoffman, Howard J.

PY - 1996/11

Y1 - 1996/11

N2 - Objective. To estimate the U.S. national prevalence of apnea monitor use by birth weight classification and to examine the relationship between the use of apnea monitors and the occurrence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Design and setting. Data obtained from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) were used. Prevalence estimates of apnea monitor use were obtained by weighting survey data, and the relationship between monitor use and SIDS was accomplished by a case-control analysis using SIDS deaths and live controls obtained from the NMIHS. Outcome measure. Weighted estimates of the prevalence of apnea monitor use and odds ratios for the odds of use of an apnea monitor among SIDS victims compared with the odds of use of an apnea monitor among living controls. Results. The national prevalence estimates for home apnea monitor use among birth weight strata of 500 to 1,499 g, 1,500 to 2,499 g, and 2,500 g or more for blacks were 19.9, 2.6, and 1.1% compared with 44.0, 8.8, and 1.2% for non-blacks. The only significant association between the use of apnea monitors and SIDS was for black 500- to 1,499-g infants. The adjusted odds ratio for SIDS among monitored black 500- to 1,499-g infants vs unmonitored infants was 3.93 (1.09, 14.17). Conclusions. This analysis suggests a marked difference in reported monitor use between U.S. black and non-black infants. In addition, black very low birth weight infants at highest risk for SIDS appear to be preferentially selected for monitoring. The protective effect of home apnea monitoring in this survey population is unclear.

AB - Objective. To estimate the U.S. national prevalence of apnea monitor use by birth weight classification and to examine the relationship between the use of apnea monitors and the occurrence of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). Design and setting. Data obtained from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (NMIHS) were used. Prevalence estimates of apnea monitor use were obtained by weighting survey data, and the relationship between monitor use and SIDS was accomplished by a case-control analysis using SIDS deaths and live controls obtained from the NMIHS. Outcome measure. Weighted estimates of the prevalence of apnea monitor use and odds ratios for the odds of use of an apnea monitor among SIDS victims compared with the odds of use of an apnea monitor among living controls. Results. The national prevalence estimates for home apnea monitor use among birth weight strata of 500 to 1,499 g, 1,500 to 2,499 g, and 2,500 g or more for blacks were 19.9, 2.6, and 1.1% compared with 44.0, 8.8, and 1.2% for non-blacks. The only significant association between the use of apnea monitors and SIDS was for black 500- to 1,499-g infants. The adjusted odds ratio for SIDS among monitored black 500- to 1,499-g infants vs unmonitored infants was 3.93 (1.09, 14.17). Conclusions. This analysis suggests a marked difference in reported monitor use between U.S. black and non-black infants. In addition, black very low birth weight infants at highest risk for SIDS appear to be preferentially selected for monitoring. The protective effect of home apnea monitoring in this survey population is unclear.

KW - apnea monitor

KW - race

KW - Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030297061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030297061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/pmed.1996.9998

DO - 10.1006/pmed.1996.9998

M3 - Article

C2 - 8936564

AN - SCOPUS:0030297061

VL - 25

SP - 645

EP - 649

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 6

ER -