Abstract
Here, we retrospectively analyzed the comparative results of 182 paired dry nasopharyngeal swabs tested by Abbott ID NOW and nasopharyngeal swabs in viral transport medium by real-time RT-PCR methods. While the overall agreement was 96.2%, we found that of 15 samples that were tested positive with RT-PCR methods, 7 were missed by ID NOW, resulting in a false-negative rate of 47%.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 115123 |
Journal | Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease |
Volume | 98 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2020 |
Keywords
- COVID-19, Abbott ID NOW
- Dry nasopharyngeal swab
- SARS-CoV-2
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Microbiology (medical)
- Infectious Diseases