Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA)

S. K. Sarna, B. L. Bardakjian, W. E. Waterfall, J. F. Lind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

74 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Colonic electrical control activity was recorded using Teflon-coated stainless steel bipolar electrodes in 15 patients undergoing cholecystectomy who gave informed consent (6 in the ascending, 4 in the transverse, 3 in the descending, and 4 in the sigmoid colon). Electrode leads were brought out through a Penrose drain and removed with it 5-7 days postoperatively. The signals were analyzed using the Fast Fourier Transform method. The ascending colon had a low level signal that showed the simultaneous presence of variable and multiple frequency components in each of the two frequency ranges - a lower frequency range (LFR) of 2.0-9.0 cycles/min and a higher frequency range (HFR) of 9.0-13.0 cycles/min. Up to four distinct frequency peaks were observed in LFR and two in HFR. The mean dominant frequency component, i.e., the one with the greatest signal strength was 4.57 in the LFR and 10.61 cycles/min in HFR. The overall dominant frequency component was in the LFR. The ECA in the transverse colon was characterized mostly by a single and a stable frequency of oscillation in HFR (mean 10.89 cycles/min). Single or multiple frequency components in LFR were sometimes present; when so, the dominant frequency component had a mean frequency of 4.17 cycles/min. The means of dominant frequency components in the LFR and HFR in the descending colon were 4.14 cycles/min and 10.90 cycles/min, respectively, while those in the sigmoid colon were 4.15 and 10.50 cycles/min, respectively. Based on the characteristics of colonic ECA, the colon could be divided into three segments. The middle segment has the overall dominant frequency in HFR, and control waves are temporarily phase-locked. This segment begins in the proximal transverse colon and may end, depending on the patient, in either the distal transverse colon, the descending colon, or the sigmoid colon. The colon proximal to this was called the proximal segment and, distal to it, the distal segment. Both of these had variable and multiple frequency components in both the frequency ranges, and the control waves were not phase-locked. The overall dominant frequency in both of these segments was in LFR. This pattern is consistent with the main colonic motor function of temporary storage and mixing but may not be related to the infrequent propulsive contractions of colonic wall during mass movements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1526-1536
Number of pages11
JournalGastroenterology
Volume78
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transverse Colon
Sigmoid Colon
Descending Colon
Electrodes
Colon
Ascending Colon
Stainless Steel
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Cholecystectomy
Fourier Analysis
Informed Consent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Sarna, S. K., Bardakjian, B. L., Waterfall, W. E., & Lind, J. F. (1980). Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA). Gastroenterology, 78(6), 1526-1536.

Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA). / Sarna, S. K.; Bardakjian, B. L.; Waterfall, W. E.; Lind, J. F.

In: Gastroenterology, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1980, p. 1526-1536.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sarna, SK, Bardakjian, BL, Waterfall, WE & Lind, JF 1980, 'Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA)', Gastroenterology, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1526-1536.
Sarna SK, Bardakjian BL, Waterfall WE, Lind JF. Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA). Gastroenterology. 1980;78(6):1526-1536.
Sarna, S. K. ; Bardakjian, B. L. ; Waterfall, W. E. ; Lind, J. F. / Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA). In: Gastroenterology. 1980 ; Vol. 78, No. 6. pp. 1526-1536.
@article{12759905178b4069b86429f3b74284f2,
title = "Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA)",
abstract = "Colonic electrical control activity was recorded using Teflon-coated stainless steel bipolar electrodes in 15 patients undergoing cholecystectomy who gave informed consent (6 in the ascending, 4 in the transverse, 3 in the descending, and 4 in the sigmoid colon). Electrode leads were brought out through a Penrose drain and removed with it 5-7 days postoperatively. The signals were analyzed using the Fast Fourier Transform method. The ascending colon had a low level signal that showed the simultaneous presence of variable and multiple frequency components in each of the two frequency ranges - a lower frequency range (LFR) of 2.0-9.0 cycles/min and a higher frequency range (HFR) of 9.0-13.0 cycles/min. Up to four distinct frequency peaks were observed in LFR and two in HFR. The mean dominant frequency component, i.e., the one with the greatest signal strength was 4.57 in the LFR and 10.61 cycles/min in HFR. The overall dominant frequency component was in the LFR. The ECA in the transverse colon was characterized mostly by a single and a stable frequency of oscillation in HFR (mean 10.89 cycles/min). Single or multiple frequency components in LFR were sometimes present; when so, the dominant frequency component had a mean frequency of 4.17 cycles/min. The means of dominant frequency components in the LFR and HFR in the descending colon were 4.14 cycles/min and 10.90 cycles/min, respectively, while those in the sigmoid colon were 4.15 and 10.50 cycles/min, respectively. Based on the characteristics of colonic ECA, the colon could be divided into three segments. The middle segment has the overall dominant frequency in HFR, and control waves are temporarily phase-locked. This segment begins in the proximal transverse colon and may end, depending on the patient, in either the distal transverse colon, the descending colon, or the sigmoid colon. The colon proximal to this was called the proximal segment and, distal to it, the distal segment. Both of these had variable and multiple frequency components in both the frequency ranges, and the control waves were not phase-locked. The overall dominant frequency in both of these segments was in LFR. This pattern is consistent with the main colonic motor function of temporary storage and mixing but may not be related to the infrequent propulsive contractions of colonic wall during mass movements.",
author = "Sarna, {S. K.} and Bardakjian, {B. L.} and Waterfall, {W. E.} and Lind, {J. F.}",
year = "1980",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "1526--1536",
journal = "Gastroenterology",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human colonic electrical control activity (ECA)

AU - Sarna, S. K.

AU - Bardakjian, B. L.

AU - Waterfall, W. E.

AU - Lind, J. F.

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - Colonic electrical control activity was recorded using Teflon-coated stainless steel bipolar electrodes in 15 patients undergoing cholecystectomy who gave informed consent (6 in the ascending, 4 in the transverse, 3 in the descending, and 4 in the sigmoid colon). Electrode leads were brought out through a Penrose drain and removed with it 5-7 days postoperatively. The signals were analyzed using the Fast Fourier Transform method. The ascending colon had a low level signal that showed the simultaneous presence of variable and multiple frequency components in each of the two frequency ranges - a lower frequency range (LFR) of 2.0-9.0 cycles/min and a higher frequency range (HFR) of 9.0-13.0 cycles/min. Up to four distinct frequency peaks were observed in LFR and two in HFR. The mean dominant frequency component, i.e., the one with the greatest signal strength was 4.57 in the LFR and 10.61 cycles/min in HFR. The overall dominant frequency component was in the LFR. The ECA in the transverse colon was characterized mostly by a single and a stable frequency of oscillation in HFR (mean 10.89 cycles/min). Single or multiple frequency components in LFR were sometimes present; when so, the dominant frequency component had a mean frequency of 4.17 cycles/min. The means of dominant frequency components in the LFR and HFR in the descending colon were 4.14 cycles/min and 10.90 cycles/min, respectively, while those in the sigmoid colon were 4.15 and 10.50 cycles/min, respectively. Based on the characteristics of colonic ECA, the colon could be divided into three segments. The middle segment has the overall dominant frequency in HFR, and control waves are temporarily phase-locked. This segment begins in the proximal transverse colon and may end, depending on the patient, in either the distal transverse colon, the descending colon, or the sigmoid colon. The colon proximal to this was called the proximal segment and, distal to it, the distal segment. Both of these had variable and multiple frequency components in both the frequency ranges, and the control waves were not phase-locked. The overall dominant frequency in both of these segments was in LFR. This pattern is consistent with the main colonic motor function of temporary storage and mixing but may not be related to the infrequent propulsive contractions of colonic wall during mass movements.

AB - Colonic electrical control activity was recorded using Teflon-coated stainless steel bipolar electrodes in 15 patients undergoing cholecystectomy who gave informed consent (6 in the ascending, 4 in the transverse, 3 in the descending, and 4 in the sigmoid colon). Electrode leads were brought out through a Penrose drain and removed with it 5-7 days postoperatively. The signals were analyzed using the Fast Fourier Transform method. The ascending colon had a low level signal that showed the simultaneous presence of variable and multiple frequency components in each of the two frequency ranges - a lower frequency range (LFR) of 2.0-9.0 cycles/min and a higher frequency range (HFR) of 9.0-13.0 cycles/min. Up to four distinct frequency peaks were observed in LFR and two in HFR. The mean dominant frequency component, i.e., the one with the greatest signal strength was 4.57 in the LFR and 10.61 cycles/min in HFR. The overall dominant frequency component was in the LFR. The ECA in the transverse colon was characterized mostly by a single and a stable frequency of oscillation in HFR (mean 10.89 cycles/min). Single or multiple frequency components in LFR were sometimes present; when so, the dominant frequency component had a mean frequency of 4.17 cycles/min. The means of dominant frequency components in the LFR and HFR in the descending colon were 4.14 cycles/min and 10.90 cycles/min, respectively, while those in the sigmoid colon were 4.15 and 10.50 cycles/min, respectively. Based on the characteristics of colonic ECA, the colon could be divided into three segments. The middle segment has the overall dominant frequency in HFR, and control waves are temporarily phase-locked. This segment begins in the proximal transverse colon and may end, depending on the patient, in either the distal transverse colon, the descending colon, or the sigmoid colon. The colon proximal to this was called the proximal segment and, distal to it, the distal segment. Both of these had variable and multiple frequency components in both the frequency ranges, and the control waves were not phase-locked. The overall dominant frequency in both of these segments was in LFR. This pattern is consistent with the main colonic motor function of temporary storage and mixing but may not be related to the infrequent propulsive contractions of colonic wall during mass movements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018853334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018853334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7372071

AN - SCOPUS:0018853334

VL - 78

SP - 1526

EP - 1536

JO - Gastroenterology

JF - Gastroenterology

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 6

ER -