Identifying patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in a primary care practice

Michael Grover, Martina Mookadam, Danielle Armas, Ciara Bozarth, Tarah Castleberry, Meghan Gannon, Denise Webb, Amylou Dueck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) whether our review of systems (ROS) form facilitates identification of sleep complaints; (2) how frequently department physicians investigate these sleep complaints; (3) the prevalence of our family practice patients at increased risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); and (4) how well ROS responses function as diagnostic tests to identify OSA risk. Methods: We used a prospectively collected sample of consecutive adult patients undergoing preventive examinations at 2 family medicine clinics. Patients completed ROS forms and the Berlin Questionnaire to determine OSA risk level. Physicians at only one site used ROS forms during care. Results: Two hundred forty-nine of 382 eligible patients (65%) completed forms and underwent examinations. Thirty-seven percent responded positively to sleep-related ROS questions. Physicians documented 24% of those complaints. ROS form use affected documentation (31% with use vs 5% without; P = .03). Thirty-three percent of all patients had increased OSA risk. Fifty-seven percent of high-risk patients responded affirmatively to an ROS question as opposed to 27% for those at lower risk (P < .001). ROS responses were 57% sensitive and 73% specific for increased OSA risk. Conclusions: Sleep symptoms were common and were recognized significantly more often when our physicians used a ROS form. However, few complaints were investigated. Our current ROS sleep questions are not sufficiently sensitive to identify increased OSA risk. Physicians should prioritize evaluation of sleep dysfunction because of the association with OSA. (J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:152-160.).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)152-160
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Primary Health Care
Sleep
Physicians
Family Practice
Berlin
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Documentation
Medicine

Keywords

  • Family medicine research
  • Obstructive sleep apnea
  • Prevention
  • Screening
  • Sleep disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Grover, M., Mookadam, M., Armas, D., Bozarth, C., Castleberry, T., Gannon, M., ... Dueck, A. (2011). Identifying patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in a primary care practice. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 24(2), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.02.100193

Identifying patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in a primary care practice. / Grover, Michael; Mookadam, Martina; Armas, Danielle; Bozarth, Ciara; Castleberry, Tarah; Gannon, Meghan; Webb, Denise; Dueck, Amylou.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 2, 03.2011, p. 152-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grover, M, Mookadam, M, Armas, D, Bozarth, C, Castleberry, T, Gannon, M, Webb, D & Dueck, A 2011, 'Identifying patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in a primary care practice', Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 152-160. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.02.100193
Grover, Michael ; Mookadam, Martina ; Armas, Danielle ; Bozarth, Ciara ; Castleberry, Tarah ; Gannon, Meghan ; Webb, Denise ; Dueck, Amylou. / Identifying patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in a primary care practice. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 152-160.
@article{2f0c4726c5ef40eca8df13216876a1f4,
title = "Identifying patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in a primary care practice",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) whether our review of systems (ROS) form facilitates identification of sleep complaints; (2) how frequently department physicians investigate these sleep complaints; (3) the prevalence of our family practice patients at increased risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); and (4) how well ROS responses function as diagnostic tests to identify OSA risk. Methods: We used a prospectively collected sample of consecutive adult patients undergoing preventive examinations at 2 family medicine clinics. Patients completed ROS forms and the Berlin Questionnaire to determine OSA risk level. Physicians at only one site used ROS forms during care. Results: Two hundred forty-nine of 382 eligible patients (65{\%}) completed forms and underwent examinations. Thirty-seven percent responded positively to sleep-related ROS questions. Physicians documented 24{\%} of those complaints. ROS form use affected documentation (31{\%} with use vs 5{\%} without; P = .03). Thirty-three percent of all patients had increased OSA risk. Fifty-seven percent of high-risk patients responded affirmatively to an ROS question as opposed to 27{\%} for those at lower risk (P < .001). ROS responses were 57{\%} sensitive and 73{\%} specific for increased OSA risk. Conclusions: Sleep symptoms were common and were recognized significantly more often when our physicians used a ROS form. However, few complaints were investigated. Our current ROS sleep questions are not sufficiently sensitive to identify increased OSA risk. Physicians should prioritize evaluation of sleep dysfunction because of the association with OSA. (J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:152-160.).",
keywords = "Family medicine research, Obstructive sleep apnea, Prevention, Screening, Sleep disorders",
author = "Michael Grover and Martina Mookadam and Danielle Armas and Ciara Bozarth and Tarah Castleberry and Meghan Gannon and Denise Webb and Amylou Dueck",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2011.02.100193",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "152--160",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea in a primary care practice

AU - Grover, Michael

AU - Mookadam, Martina

AU - Armas, Danielle

AU - Bozarth, Ciara

AU - Castleberry, Tarah

AU - Gannon, Meghan

AU - Webb, Denise

AU - Dueck, Amylou

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) whether our review of systems (ROS) form facilitates identification of sleep complaints; (2) how frequently department physicians investigate these sleep complaints; (3) the prevalence of our family practice patients at increased risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); and (4) how well ROS responses function as diagnostic tests to identify OSA risk. Methods: We used a prospectively collected sample of consecutive adult patients undergoing preventive examinations at 2 family medicine clinics. Patients completed ROS forms and the Berlin Questionnaire to determine OSA risk level. Physicians at only one site used ROS forms during care. Results: Two hundred forty-nine of 382 eligible patients (65%) completed forms and underwent examinations. Thirty-seven percent responded positively to sleep-related ROS questions. Physicians documented 24% of those complaints. ROS form use affected documentation (31% with use vs 5% without; P = .03). Thirty-three percent of all patients had increased OSA risk. Fifty-seven percent of high-risk patients responded affirmatively to an ROS question as opposed to 27% for those at lower risk (P < .001). ROS responses were 57% sensitive and 73% specific for increased OSA risk. Conclusions: Sleep symptoms were common and were recognized significantly more often when our physicians used a ROS form. However, few complaints were investigated. Our current ROS sleep questions are not sufficiently sensitive to identify increased OSA risk. Physicians should prioritize evaluation of sleep dysfunction because of the association with OSA. (J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:152-160.).

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine (1) whether our review of systems (ROS) form facilitates identification of sleep complaints; (2) how frequently department physicians investigate these sleep complaints; (3) the prevalence of our family practice patients at increased risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); and (4) how well ROS responses function as diagnostic tests to identify OSA risk. Methods: We used a prospectively collected sample of consecutive adult patients undergoing preventive examinations at 2 family medicine clinics. Patients completed ROS forms and the Berlin Questionnaire to determine OSA risk level. Physicians at only one site used ROS forms during care. Results: Two hundred forty-nine of 382 eligible patients (65%) completed forms and underwent examinations. Thirty-seven percent responded positively to sleep-related ROS questions. Physicians documented 24% of those complaints. ROS form use affected documentation (31% with use vs 5% without; P = .03). Thirty-three percent of all patients had increased OSA risk. Fifty-seven percent of high-risk patients responded affirmatively to an ROS question as opposed to 27% for those at lower risk (P < .001). ROS responses were 57% sensitive and 73% specific for increased OSA risk. Conclusions: Sleep symptoms were common and were recognized significantly more often when our physicians used a ROS form. However, few complaints were investigated. Our current ROS sleep questions are not sufficiently sensitive to identify increased OSA risk. Physicians should prioritize evaluation of sleep dysfunction because of the association with OSA. (J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:152-160.).

KW - Family medicine research

KW - Obstructive sleep apnea

KW - Prevention

KW - Screening

KW - Sleep disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952556463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952556463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2011.02.100193

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2011.02.100193

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 152

EP - 160

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 2

ER -