Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients

Alda Tam, Joe E. Ensor, Holly Snyder, Sanjay Gupta, Jean Bernard Durand, Michael J. Wallace

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report our clinical experience with image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. IRB approval was obtained for this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study. From November 2002 to January 2008, 40 patients underwent 43 image-guided drainages of pericardial effusions. The medical records were reviewed to analyze the technical aspects of the procedures, complications, and clinical outcomes. Thirty-three pericardial drains were placed and 10 pericardiocenteses were performed. The technical success rate was 100%. Thirty-three procedures were performed under computed tomographic (CT) guidance, five under ultrasound (US) guidance, and five using both CT and US guidance. There were no technical, procedure-related complications. Delayed postprocedure complications and arrhythmias occurred in 11 cases, for an overall complication rate of 25.6%. All complications occurred in patients who had undergone drain placement. Nine patients developed new or worsening arrhythmias and six of these patients required transfer to a higher level of care or the initiation of pharmacological management. In 58.6% of drain placements, including 4 of 11 patients who developed complications, the catheter could have been removed earlier. The median overall survival was 6.47 months (95% CI: 2.37, 12.7). In conclusion, image-guided pericardial drain placement is safe and feasible. Due to the frequency of delayed postprocedure arrhythmias, follow-up monitoring in a telemetry unit is recommended. Prompt catheter removal after drainage may reduce the incidence of delayed post-catheter-insertion arrhythmias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1217-1226
Number of pages10
JournalCardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pericardial Effusion
Drainage
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Catheters
Pericardiocentesis
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Patient Transfer
Telemetry
Research Ethics Committees
Medical Records
Pharmacology
Survival
Incidence

Keywords

  • Neoplasm
  • Percutaneous drainage
  • Pericardial drain
  • Pericardial effusion
  • Pericardiocentesis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Tam, A., Ensor, J. E., Snyder, H., Gupta, S., Durand, J. B., & Wallace, M. J. (2009). Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 32(6), 1217-1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9594-7

Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. / Tam, Alda; Ensor, Joe E.; Snyder, Holly; Gupta, Sanjay; Durand, Jean Bernard; Wallace, Michael J.

In: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 32, No. 6, 11.2009, p. 1217-1226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tam, A, Ensor, JE, Snyder, H, Gupta, S, Durand, JB & Wallace, MJ 2009, 'Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients', CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1217-1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9594-7
Tam, Alda ; Ensor, Joe E. ; Snyder, Holly ; Gupta, Sanjay ; Durand, Jean Bernard ; Wallace, Michael J. / Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. In: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2009 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 1217-1226.
@article{e7bdbf98b41147eca7046672790a649a,
title = "Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to report our clinical experience with image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. IRB approval was obtained for this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study. From November 2002 to January 2008, 40 patients underwent 43 image-guided drainages of pericardial effusions. The medical records were reviewed to analyze the technical aspects of the procedures, complications, and clinical outcomes. Thirty-three pericardial drains were placed and 10 pericardiocenteses were performed. The technical success rate was 100{\%}. Thirty-three procedures were performed under computed tomographic (CT) guidance, five under ultrasound (US) guidance, and five using both CT and US guidance. There were no technical, procedure-related complications. Delayed postprocedure complications and arrhythmias occurred in 11 cases, for an overall complication rate of 25.6{\%}. All complications occurred in patients who had undergone drain placement. Nine patients developed new or worsening arrhythmias and six of these patients required transfer to a higher level of care or the initiation of pharmacological management. In 58.6{\%} of drain placements, including 4 of 11 patients who developed complications, the catheter could have been removed earlier. The median overall survival was 6.47 months (95{\%} CI: 2.37, 12.7). In conclusion, image-guided pericardial drain placement is safe and feasible. Due to the frequency of delayed postprocedure arrhythmias, follow-up monitoring in a telemetry unit is recommended. Prompt catheter removal after drainage may reduce the incidence of delayed post-catheter-insertion arrhythmias.",
keywords = "Neoplasm, Percutaneous drainage, Pericardial drain, Pericardial effusion, Pericardiocentesis",
author = "Alda Tam and Ensor, {Joe E.} and Holly Snyder and Sanjay Gupta and Durand, {Jean Bernard} and Wallace, {Michael J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s00270-009-9594-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1217--1226",
journal = "CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology",
issn = "7415-5101",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients

AU - Tam, Alda

AU - Ensor, Joe E.

AU - Snyder, Holly

AU - Gupta, Sanjay

AU - Durand, Jean Bernard

AU - Wallace, Michael J.

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - The purpose of this study was to report our clinical experience with image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. IRB approval was obtained for this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study. From November 2002 to January 2008, 40 patients underwent 43 image-guided drainages of pericardial effusions. The medical records were reviewed to analyze the technical aspects of the procedures, complications, and clinical outcomes. Thirty-three pericardial drains were placed and 10 pericardiocenteses were performed. The technical success rate was 100%. Thirty-three procedures were performed under computed tomographic (CT) guidance, five under ultrasound (US) guidance, and five using both CT and US guidance. There were no technical, procedure-related complications. Delayed postprocedure complications and arrhythmias occurred in 11 cases, for an overall complication rate of 25.6%. All complications occurred in patients who had undergone drain placement. Nine patients developed new or worsening arrhythmias and six of these patients required transfer to a higher level of care or the initiation of pharmacological management. In 58.6% of drain placements, including 4 of 11 patients who developed complications, the catheter could have been removed earlier. The median overall survival was 6.47 months (95% CI: 2.37, 12.7). In conclusion, image-guided pericardial drain placement is safe and feasible. Due to the frequency of delayed postprocedure arrhythmias, follow-up monitoring in a telemetry unit is recommended. Prompt catheter removal after drainage may reduce the incidence of delayed post-catheter-insertion arrhythmias.

AB - The purpose of this study was to report our clinical experience with image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. IRB approval was obtained for this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study. From November 2002 to January 2008, 40 patients underwent 43 image-guided drainages of pericardial effusions. The medical records were reviewed to analyze the technical aspects of the procedures, complications, and clinical outcomes. Thirty-three pericardial drains were placed and 10 pericardiocenteses were performed. The technical success rate was 100%. Thirty-three procedures were performed under computed tomographic (CT) guidance, five under ultrasound (US) guidance, and five using both CT and US guidance. There were no technical, procedure-related complications. Delayed postprocedure complications and arrhythmias occurred in 11 cases, for an overall complication rate of 25.6%. All complications occurred in patients who had undergone drain placement. Nine patients developed new or worsening arrhythmias and six of these patients required transfer to a higher level of care or the initiation of pharmacological management. In 58.6% of drain placements, including 4 of 11 patients who developed complications, the catheter could have been removed earlier. The median overall survival was 6.47 months (95% CI: 2.37, 12.7). In conclusion, image-guided pericardial drain placement is safe and feasible. Due to the frequency of delayed postprocedure arrhythmias, follow-up monitoring in a telemetry unit is recommended. Prompt catheter removal after drainage may reduce the incidence of delayed post-catheter-insertion arrhythmias.

KW - Neoplasm

KW - Percutaneous drainage

KW - Pericardial drain

KW - Pericardial effusion

KW - Pericardiocentesis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71449104773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71449104773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00270-009-9594-7

DO - 10.1007/s00270-009-9594-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 19472002

AN - SCOPUS:71449104773

VL - 32

SP - 1217

EP - 1226

JO - CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

JF - CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

SN - 7415-5101

IS - 6

ER -