Image-guided intravascular brachytherapy dose escalation

Luke Lussier, Kent Wallner, Kathleen E. Kearney, Jasleen Tiwana, Edward Y. Kim, Upendra Parvathaneni, William L. Lombardi, Mark Phillips, Creighton Don, Minsun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Coronary stents reduce IVBT radiation dose with a single layer by 10–30%. However, the impact of multiple stent layers and stent expansion remains unexplored. Individualized dose adjustments considering variations in stent layers and expansion could improve radiation delivery effectiveness. METHODS: EGSnrc was used to compute the delivered vessel wall dose in various IVBT scenarios. Stent effects were modeled for the stent density of 25%, 50%, and 75% with 1, 2, and 3 layers respectively. Doses were calculated at 1.75 to 5.00 mm away from the source center, normalized to 100% at 2 mm. RESULTS: Dose fall-off increased with increasing stent density. With a single layer, the dose at 2 mm from source fell from 100% of prescription to 92%, 83% and 73% at 25%, 50% and 75% density, respectively. The computed dose to points with increasing radial distance from the source decreased progressively with increasing stent layers. With three layers, at 75% stent density, the dose at 2 mm from source center fell to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: A schema for image-guided IVBT dose adjustment is described. While it would be an improvement over current standard of care, myriad factors remain to be addressed in a comprehensive effort to optimize IVBT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)518-523
Number of pages6
JournalBrachytherapy
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brachytherapy
  • Cardiac
  • Coronary
  • Heart
  • Oncology
  • Radiation
  • Restenosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Image-guided intravascular brachytherapy dose escalation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this