TY - JOUR
T1 - Image-guided intravascular brachytherapy dose escalation
AU - Lussier, Luke
AU - Wallner, Kent
AU - Kearney, Kathleen E.
AU - Tiwana, Jasleen
AU - Kim, Edward Y.
AU - Parvathaneni, Upendra
AU - Lombardi, William L.
AU - Phillips, Mark
AU - Don, Creighton
AU - Kim, Minsun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Brachytherapy Society
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - PURPOSE: Coronary stents reduce IVBT radiation dose with a single layer by 10–30%. However, the impact of multiple stent layers and stent expansion remains unexplored. Individualized dose adjustments considering variations in stent layers and expansion could improve radiation delivery effectiveness. METHODS: EGSnrc was used to compute the delivered vessel wall dose in various IVBT scenarios. Stent effects were modeled for the stent density of 25%, 50%, and 75% with 1, 2, and 3 layers respectively. Doses were calculated at 1.75 to 5.00 mm away from the source center, normalized to 100% at 2 mm. RESULTS: Dose fall-off increased with increasing stent density. With a single layer, the dose at 2 mm from source fell from 100% of prescription to 92%, 83% and 73% at 25%, 50% and 75% density, respectively. The computed dose to points with increasing radial distance from the source decreased progressively with increasing stent layers. With three layers, at 75% stent density, the dose at 2 mm from source center fell to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: A schema for image-guided IVBT dose adjustment is described. While it would be an improvement over current standard of care, myriad factors remain to be addressed in a comprehensive effort to optimize IVBT.
AB - PURPOSE: Coronary stents reduce IVBT radiation dose with a single layer by 10–30%. However, the impact of multiple stent layers and stent expansion remains unexplored. Individualized dose adjustments considering variations in stent layers and expansion could improve radiation delivery effectiveness. METHODS: EGSnrc was used to compute the delivered vessel wall dose in various IVBT scenarios. Stent effects were modeled for the stent density of 25%, 50%, and 75% with 1, 2, and 3 layers respectively. Doses were calculated at 1.75 to 5.00 mm away from the source center, normalized to 100% at 2 mm. RESULTS: Dose fall-off increased with increasing stent density. With a single layer, the dose at 2 mm from source fell from 100% of prescription to 92%, 83% and 73% at 25%, 50% and 75% density, respectively. The computed dose to points with increasing radial distance from the source decreased progressively with increasing stent layers. With three layers, at 75% stent density, the dose at 2 mm from source center fell to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: A schema for image-guided IVBT dose adjustment is described. While it would be an improvement over current standard of care, myriad factors remain to be addressed in a comprehensive effort to optimize IVBT.
KW - Brachytherapy
KW - Cardiac
KW - Coronary
KW - Heart
KW - Oncology
KW - Radiation
KW - Restenosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160044772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160044772&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.04.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 37211487
AN - SCOPUS:85160044772
SN - 1538-4721
VL - 22
SP - 518
EP - 523
JO - Brachytherapy
JF - Brachytherapy
IS - 4
ER -