Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas.

Rebecca Loredo, Andres Rahal, Glenn Garcia, Darlene Metter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multiple diagnostic imaging modalities are available and beneficial for the evaluation of the diabetic foot. There is not yet "one best test" for sorting out the diagnostic dilemmas commonly encountered. The differentiation of cellulitis alone from underlying osteomyelitis and the early detection of abscesses remain important diagnostic goals. Equally important, differentiation of osteomyelitis and neuroarthropathy remains a difficult job. This is often compounded by postoperative diabetic foot states status after reconstruction. Diagnostic evaluation often involves multiple studies that are complementary and that include conventional radiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-264
Number of pages16
JournalFoot & ankle specialist
Volume3
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diabetic Foot
Osteomyelitis
Cellulitis
Nuclear Medicine
Diagnostic Imaging
Radiography
Radionuclide Imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography
Abscess
Ultrasonography
Tomography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Loredo, R., Rahal, A., Garcia, G., & Metter, D. (2010). Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas. Foot & ankle specialist, 3(5), 249-264.

Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas. / Loredo, Rebecca; Rahal, Andres; Garcia, Glenn; Metter, Darlene.

In: Foot & ankle specialist, Vol. 3, No. 5, 10.2010, p. 249-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Loredo, R, Rahal, A, Garcia, G & Metter, D 2010, 'Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas.', Foot & ankle specialist, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 249-264.
Loredo, Rebecca ; Rahal, Andres ; Garcia, Glenn ; Metter, Darlene. / Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas. In: Foot & ankle specialist. 2010 ; Vol. 3, No. 5. pp. 249-264.
@article{242ebd82ddc4493c9c6671aa7dca181c,
title = "Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas.",
abstract = "Multiple diagnostic imaging modalities are available and beneficial for the evaluation of the diabetic foot. There is not yet {"}one best test{"} for sorting out the diagnostic dilemmas commonly encountered. The differentiation of cellulitis alone from underlying osteomyelitis and the early detection of abscesses remain important diagnostic goals. Equally important, differentiation of osteomyelitis and neuroarthropathy remains a difficult job. This is often compounded by postoperative diabetic foot states status after reconstruction. Diagnostic evaluation often involves multiple studies that are complementary and that include conventional radiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography.",
author = "Rebecca Loredo and Andres Rahal and Glenn Garcia and Darlene Metter",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "249--264",
journal = "Foot & ankle specialist",
issn = "1938-6400",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging of the diabetic foot diagnostic dilemmas.

AU - Loredo, Rebecca

AU - Rahal, Andres

AU - Garcia, Glenn

AU - Metter, Darlene

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Multiple diagnostic imaging modalities are available and beneficial for the evaluation of the diabetic foot. There is not yet "one best test" for sorting out the diagnostic dilemmas commonly encountered. The differentiation of cellulitis alone from underlying osteomyelitis and the early detection of abscesses remain important diagnostic goals. Equally important, differentiation of osteomyelitis and neuroarthropathy remains a difficult job. This is often compounded by postoperative diabetic foot states status after reconstruction. Diagnostic evaluation often involves multiple studies that are complementary and that include conventional radiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography.

AB - Multiple diagnostic imaging modalities are available and beneficial for the evaluation of the diabetic foot. There is not yet "one best test" for sorting out the diagnostic dilemmas commonly encountered. The differentiation of cellulitis alone from underlying osteomyelitis and the early detection of abscesses remain important diagnostic goals. Equally important, differentiation of osteomyelitis and neuroarthropathy remains a difficult job. This is often compounded by postoperative diabetic foot states status after reconstruction. Diagnostic evaluation often involves multiple studies that are complementary and that include conventional radiography, computed tomography, nuclear medicine scintigraphy, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and positron emission tomography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953011500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79953011500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 249

EP - 264

JO - Foot & ankle specialist

JF - Foot & ankle specialist

SN - 1938-6400

IS - 5

ER -