Immunohistochemical staining of transgenic beta-galactosidase in burned skin is a better indicator of transfection efficiency than histochemical techniques

Clifford Pereira, Mokhtar Maamar-Tayeb, Ann Burke, Regino Perez-Polo, David Herndon, Marc G. Jeschke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The non-mammalian reporter gene LacZ, encoding the protein β-galactosidase (β-Gal), has long been used to test the efficiency of gene transfer into cells in culture or tissues in vivo. Biodistribution and dose-response transfection experiments rely upon a sensitive and specific technique for accurate results. We conducted an experiment to compare two techniques of identifying beta-galactosidase expression. The presence of β-Gal was detected by dual staining transfected murine skin by both immunohistochemical (alkaline phosphatase) as well as histochemical staining (5-bromo-indolyl-beta-o-galactopyranoside [Bluo-Gal]). We demonstrated an almost two-fold increase in beta-galactosidase transfected dermal cell staining using immunohistochemistry as compared with histochemical staining. This translates to nearly 63% cells that were transfected with LacZ but were not identified by Bluo-Gal. The superior sensitivity of immunostaining suggests that anti-β-Gal antibody represents the preferred analytical tool for light microscopic evaluation of LacZ gene transfer, promoter analysis in transgenic animals. Thus, identification of activity as opposed to presence of the enzyme underestimates gene expression following LacZ gene transfer in skin.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-79
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Immunological Methods
Volume315
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 31 2006

Fingerprint

beta-Galactosidase
Transfection
Staining and Labeling
Skin
Lac Operon
Galactosidases
Genetically Modified Animals
Galactose
Reporter Genes
Alkaline Phosphatase
Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies
Cell Culture Techniques
Immunohistochemistry
Gene Expression
Light
Enzymes
Genes
Proteins

Keywords

  • Burns
  • Immunohistochemical technique
  • Liposomal gene transfer
  • Transfection assay

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Immunology

Cite this

Immunohistochemical staining of transgenic beta-galactosidase in burned skin is a better indicator of transfection efficiency than histochemical techniques. / Pereira, Clifford; Maamar-Tayeb, Mokhtar; Burke, Ann; Perez-Polo, Regino; Herndon, David; Jeschke, Marc G.

In: Journal of Immunological Methods, Vol. 315, No. 1-2, 31.08.2006, p. 75-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pereira, Clifford ; Maamar-Tayeb, Mokhtar ; Burke, Ann ; Perez-Polo, Regino ; Herndon, David ; Jeschke, Marc G. / Immunohistochemical staining of transgenic beta-galactosidase in burned skin is a better indicator of transfection efficiency than histochemical techniques. In: Journal of Immunological Methods. 2006 ; Vol. 315, No. 1-2. pp. 75-79.
@article{d6d7452d5da44b7ebb5472fb6e4f100a,
title = "Immunohistochemical staining of transgenic beta-galactosidase in burned skin is a better indicator of transfection efficiency than histochemical techniques",
abstract = "The non-mammalian reporter gene LacZ, encoding the protein β-galactosidase (β-Gal), has long been used to test the efficiency of gene transfer into cells in culture or tissues in vivo. Biodistribution and dose-response transfection experiments rely upon a sensitive and specific technique for accurate results. We conducted an experiment to compare two techniques of identifying beta-galactosidase expression. The presence of β-Gal was detected by dual staining transfected murine skin by both immunohistochemical (alkaline phosphatase) as well as histochemical staining (5-bromo-indolyl-beta-o-galactopyranoside [Bluo-Gal]). We demonstrated an almost two-fold increase in beta-galactosidase transfected dermal cell staining using immunohistochemistry as compared with histochemical staining. This translates to nearly 63{\%} cells that were transfected with LacZ but were not identified by Bluo-Gal. The superior sensitivity of immunostaining suggests that anti-β-Gal antibody represents the preferred analytical tool for light microscopic evaluation of LacZ gene transfer, promoter analysis in transgenic animals. Thus, identification of activity as opposed to presence of the enzyme underestimates gene expression following LacZ gene transfer in skin.",
keywords = "Burns, Immunohistochemical technique, Liposomal gene transfer, Transfection assay",
author = "Clifford Pereira and Mokhtar Maamar-Tayeb and Ann Burke and Regino Perez-Polo and David Herndon and Jeschke, {Marc G.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.jim.2006.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "315",
pages = "75--79",
journal = "Journal of Immunological Methods",
issn = "0022-1759",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immunohistochemical staining of transgenic beta-galactosidase in burned skin is a better indicator of transfection efficiency than histochemical techniques

AU - Pereira, Clifford

AU - Maamar-Tayeb, Mokhtar

AU - Burke, Ann

AU - Perez-Polo, Regino

AU - Herndon, David

AU - Jeschke, Marc G.

PY - 2006/8/31

Y1 - 2006/8/31

N2 - The non-mammalian reporter gene LacZ, encoding the protein β-galactosidase (β-Gal), has long been used to test the efficiency of gene transfer into cells in culture or tissues in vivo. Biodistribution and dose-response transfection experiments rely upon a sensitive and specific technique for accurate results. We conducted an experiment to compare two techniques of identifying beta-galactosidase expression. The presence of β-Gal was detected by dual staining transfected murine skin by both immunohistochemical (alkaline phosphatase) as well as histochemical staining (5-bromo-indolyl-beta-o-galactopyranoside [Bluo-Gal]). We demonstrated an almost two-fold increase in beta-galactosidase transfected dermal cell staining using immunohistochemistry as compared with histochemical staining. This translates to nearly 63% cells that were transfected with LacZ but were not identified by Bluo-Gal. The superior sensitivity of immunostaining suggests that anti-β-Gal antibody represents the preferred analytical tool for light microscopic evaluation of LacZ gene transfer, promoter analysis in transgenic animals. Thus, identification of activity as opposed to presence of the enzyme underestimates gene expression following LacZ gene transfer in skin.

AB - The non-mammalian reporter gene LacZ, encoding the protein β-galactosidase (β-Gal), has long been used to test the efficiency of gene transfer into cells in culture or tissues in vivo. Biodistribution and dose-response transfection experiments rely upon a sensitive and specific technique for accurate results. We conducted an experiment to compare two techniques of identifying beta-galactosidase expression. The presence of β-Gal was detected by dual staining transfected murine skin by both immunohistochemical (alkaline phosphatase) as well as histochemical staining (5-bromo-indolyl-beta-o-galactopyranoside [Bluo-Gal]). We demonstrated an almost two-fold increase in beta-galactosidase transfected dermal cell staining using immunohistochemistry as compared with histochemical staining. This translates to nearly 63% cells that were transfected with LacZ but were not identified by Bluo-Gal. The superior sensitivity of immunostaining suggests that anti-β-Gal antibody represents the preferred analytical tool for light microscopic evaluation of LacZ gene transfer, promoter analysis in transgenic animals. Thus, identification of activity as opposed to presence of the enzyme underestimates gene expression following LacZ gene transfer in skin.

KW - Burns

KW - Immunohistochemical technique

KW - Liposomal gene transfer

KW - Transfection assay

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748758730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748758730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jim.2006.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jim.2006.07.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 16914157

AN - SCOPUS:33748758730

VL - 315

SP - 75

EP - 79

JO - Journal of Immunological Methods

JF - Journal of Immunological Methods

SN - 0022-1759

IS - 1-2

ER -