Impact of Bowel Coverage and Resuscitation Protocol on Gastroschisis Mortality in Low-Income Countries: Experience and Lessons From Uganda

Background: Gastroschisis causes near complete mortality in low-income countries (LICs). This study seeks to understand the impact of bedside bowel reduction and silo placement, and protocolized resuscitation on gastroschisis outcomes in LICs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of gastroschisis patients at a tertiary referral center in Kampala, Uganda. Multiple approaches for bedside application of bowel coverage devices and delayed closure were used: sutured urine bags (2017–2018), improvised silos using wound protectors (2020–2021), and spring-loaded silos (2022). Total parental nutrition (TPN) was not available; however, with the use of improvised silos, a protocol was implemented to include protocolized resuscitation and early enteral feeding. Risk ratios (RR) for mortality were calculated in comparison to historic controls from 2014. Results: 368 patients were included: 42 historic controls, 7 primary closures, 81 sutured urine bags, 133 improvised silos and 105 spring-loaded silos. No differences were found in sex (p = 0.31), days to presentation (p = 0.84), and distance traveled to the tertiary hospital (p = 0.16). Following the introduction of bowel coverage methods, the proportion of infants that survived to discharge increased from 2% to 16–29%. In comparison to historic controls, the risk of mortality significantly decreased: sutured urine bags 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52–0.80), improvised silo 0.76 (0.66–0.87), and spring-loaded silo 0.65 (0.56–0.76). Conclusion: Bedside application of bowel coverage and protocolization decreases the risk of death for infants with gastroschisis, even in the absence of TPN. Further efforts to expand supply of low-cost silos in LICs would significantly decrease the mortality associated with gastroschisis in this setting. Type of Study: Treatment Study. Level of Evidence: III (Retrospective Comparative Study).