TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Imaging Acquisition and Protocol Variability on Artificial Intelligence Model Performance
T2 - A Secondary Analysis of the ASFNR Artificial Intelligence Competition
AU - Zhu, Guangming
AU - Ozkara, Burak Berksu
AU - Allen, Jason W.
AU - Barboriak, Daniel P.
AU - Chaudhari, Ruchir
AU - Chen, Hui
AU - Chukus, Anjeza
AU - Etter, Micah
AU - Filippi, Christopher G.
AU - Flanders, Adam E.
AU - Godwin, Ryan
AU - Hashmi, Syed
AU - Hess, Christopher
AU - Hsu, Kevin
AU - Jiang, Bin
AU - Lui, Yvonne W.
AU - Maldjian, Joseph A.
AU - Michel, Patrik
AU - Nalawade, Sahil S.
AU - Raghavan, Prashant
AU - Sair, Haris I.
AU - Welker, Kirk
AU - Whitlow, Christopher T.
AU - Zaharchuk, Greg
AU - Wintermark, Max
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026, AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2026/9/1
Y1 - 2026/9/1
N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial intelligence (Al) models have shown promise in neuroradiology, yet their real-world gener- alizability remains uncertain, partly due to variability in imaging acquisition and protocols. We aimed to evaluate the impact of data source, scanner manufacturer, scan mode, slice thickness, and the Al models, developed by participating teams, on Al per- formance in this secondary analysis of the 2019 American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR) Al Competition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 1177 anonymized noncontrast head CT scans from 5 institutions. Four teams participated, developing models to detect acute ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mass effect and to assess age-appropriate normal- ity. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the effects of the variables on model performance, and collinearity diagnostics were applied to exclude redundant variables. RESULTS: Due to collinearity with the scanner manufacturer, data source was excluded from the model. Across all tasks, the Al model significantly influenced the performance. The scanner manufacturer was significantly associated with accuracy in detecting intracranial hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke but not mass effect or age-based normality. Slice thickness was significantly associated with detection of intracranial hemorrhage and mass effect, with thinner slices yielding higher accuracy, but it showed no effect on ischemic stroke or normality assessments. The scan mode did not significantly influence performance for any task. CONCLUSIONS: This secondary analysis demonstrates that imaging acquisition and protocol variability may significantly affect Al model performance. Scanner manufacturer, slice thickness, and the developed Al model were significantly associated with model accuracy, whereas scan mode had no significant impact. Among these, the developed Al model consistently proved the most influ- ential, reflecting the importance of training data, model architecture, and preprocessing methods.
AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Artificial intelligence (Al) models have shown promise in neuroradiology, yet their real-world gener- alizability remains uncertain, partly due to variability in imaging acquisition and protocols. We aimed to evaluate the impact of data source, scanner manufacturer, scan mode, slice thickness, and the Al models, developed by participating teams, on Al per- formance in this secondary analysis of the 2019 American Society of Functional Neuroradiology (ASFNR) Al Competition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 1177 anonymized noncontrast head CT scans from 5 institutions. Four teams participated, developing models to detect acute ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and mass effect and to assess age-appropriate normal- ity. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the effects of the variables on model performance, and collinearity diagnostics were applied to exclude redundant variables. RESULTS: Due to collinearity with the scanner manufacturer, data source was excluded from the model. Across all tasks, the Al model significantly influenced the performance. The scanner manufacturer was significantly associated with accuracy in detecting intracranial hemorrhage and acute ischemic stroke but not mass effect or age-based normality. Slice thickness was significantly associated with detection of intracranial hemorrhage and mass effect, with thinner slices yielding higher accuracy, but it showed no effect on ischemic stroke or normality assessments. The scan mode did not significantly influence performance for any task. CONCLUSIONS: This secondary analysis demonstrates that imaging acquisition and protocol variability may significantly affect Al model performance. Scanner manufacturer, slice thickness, and the developed Al model were significantly associated with model accuracy, whereas scan mode had no significant impact. Among these, the developed Al model consistently proved the most influ- ential, reflecting the importance of training data, model architecture, and preprocessing methods.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105049127231
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105049127231#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A9266
DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A9266
M3 - Article
C2 - 41760384
AN - SCOPUS:105049127231
SN - 0195-6108
VL - 47
SP - 2366
EP - 2371
JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology
JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology
IS - 9
ER -