TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of liver-directed therapy in colorectal cancer liver metastases
AU - Vargas, Gabriela M.
AU - Parmar, Abhishek D.
AU - Sheffield, Kristin M.
AU - Tamirisa, Nina P.
AU - Brown, Kimberly M.
AU - Riall, Taylor S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgment Statement Regarding Texas Cancer Registry and SEER Data. The collection of cancer incident data used in this study was supported by the Texas Department of State Health Services and Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, as part of the statewide cancer reporting program, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries Cooperative Agreement No. 5U58/DP000824-05. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent official views of the Department of State Health Services, Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas, or Centers for Disease Control. The collection of the California cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Public Health as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Northern California Cancer Center, contract N01-PC-35139 awarded to the University of Southern California and contract N02-PC-15105 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries under agreement No. U55/CCR921930-02 awarded to the Public Health Institute. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and endorsement by the State of California, Department of Public Health, the National Cancer Institute, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or their Contractors and Subcontractors is not intended nor should be inferred. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, NCI; the Office of Research, Development and Information, CMS; Information Management Services, Inc; and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER-Medicare database. Funding: Supported by grants from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas grant number. RP101207-P03 , the University of Texas Medical Branch Clinical and Translational Science Award (number UL1TR000071), National Institutes of Health T-32 grant number 5T32DK007639 , and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant number 1R24HS022134 . Authors' contributions: G.M.V. contributed to analysis and interpretation, writing the article, and critical revisions of the article. A.D.P. was responsible for writing the article and critical revisions of the article. K.M.S. contributed to conception, design, data interpretation, and writing the article. N.P.T. was responsible for writing the article and critical revisions of the article. K.M.B. was responsible for conception and design. T.S.R. was responsible for conception, design, data analysis and interpretation, writing the article and critical revisions of the article.
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Background There is a paucity of data on the current management and outcomes of liver-directed therapy (LDT) in older patients presenting with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the study was to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes in use of LDT in the setting of improved chemotherapy. Methods We used Cancer Registry and linked Medicare claims to identify patients aged ≥66 y undergoing surgical resection of the primary tumor and chemotherapy after presenting with stage IV CRC (2001-2007). LDT was defined as liver resection and/or ablation-embolization. Results We identified 5500 patients. LDT was used in 34.9% of patients; liver resection was performed in 1686 patients (30.7%), and ablation-embolization in 554 patients (10.1%), with 322 patients having both resection and ablation-embolization. Use of LDT was negatively associated with increasing year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.99), age >85 y (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82), and poor tumor differentiation (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.83). LDT was associated with improved survival (median 28.4 versus 21.1 mo, P < 0.0001); however, survival improved for all patients over time. We found a significant interaction between LDT and period of diagnosis and noted a greater survival improvement with LDT for those diagnosed in the late (2005-2007) period. Conclusions Older patients with stage IV CRC are experiencing improved survival over time, independent of age, comorbidity, and use of LDT. However, many older patients deemed to be appropriate candidates for resection of the primary tumor and receipt of systemic chemotherapy did not receive LDT. Our data suggest that improved patient selection may be positively impacting outcomes. Early referral and optimal selection of patients for LDT has the potential to further improve survival in older patients presenting with advanced colorectal cancer.
AB - Background There is a paucity of data on the current management and outcomes of liver-directed therapy (LDT) in older patients presenting with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the study was to evaluate treatment patterns and outcomes in use of LDT in the setting of improved chemotherapy. Methods We used Cancer Registry and linked Medicare claims to identify patients aged ≥66 y undergoing surgical resection of the primary tumor and chemotherapy after presenting with stage IV CRC (2001-2007). LDT was defined as liver resection and/or ablation-embolization. Results We identified 5500 patients. LDT was used in 34.9% of patients; liver resection was performed in 1686 patients (30.7%), and ablation-embolization in 554 patients (10.1%), with 322 patients having both resection and ablation-embolization. Use of LDT was negatively associated with increasing year of diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.99), age >85 y (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.82), and poor tumor differentiation (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.83). LDT was associated with improved survival (median 28.4 versus 21.1 mo, P < 0.0001); however, survival improved for all patients over time. We found a significant interaction between LDT and period of diagnosis and noted a greater survival improvement with LDT for those diagnosed in the late (2005-2007) period. Conclusions Older patients with stage IV CRC are experiencing improved survival over time, independent of age, comorbidity, and use of LDT. However, many older patients deemed to be appropriate candidates for resection of the primary tumor and receipt of systemic chemotherapy did not receive LDT. Our data suggest that improved patient selection may be positively impacting outcomes. Early referral and optimal selection of patients for LDT has the potential to further improve survival in older patients presenting with advanced colorectal cancer.
KW - Colorectal cancer liver metastases
KW - Liver-directed therapy
KW - Metastatic colorectal cancer
KW - Synchronous lesions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906266563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906266563&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.070
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.070
M3 - Article
C2 - 24990539
AN - SCOPUS:84906266563
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 191
SP - 42
EP - 50
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
IS - 1
ER -