TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of preoperative lumbosacral takeoff flexibility on postoperative correction following spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
T2 - a new consideration for selective thoracic fusion
AU - Harms Research Study Group
AU - Campbell, Richard E.
AU - Rudic, Theodore
AU - Hafey, Alexander
AU - Driskill, Elizabeth
AU - Newton, Peter O.
AU - Bachmann, Keith R.
AU - Upasani, Vidyadhar
AU - Errico, Tom
AU - Garg, Sumeet
AU - Shah, Suken
AU - Hwang, Steven
AU - George, Stephen
AU - Parent, Stefan
AU - Cho, Robert H.
AU - Betz, Randal
AU - Sturm, Peter
AU - Newton, Peter
AU - Gabos, Peter
AU - Sponseller, Paul
AU - Cahill, Patrick
AU - Fletcher, Nicholas
AU - Gupta, Munish
AU - Marks, Michelle
AU - Vitale, Michael
AU - Kelly, Michael
AU - Glotzbecker, Michael
AU - Erickson, Mark
AU - Abel, Mark
AU - Lenke, Lawrence
AU - Haber, Lawrence
AU - Blakemore, Laurel
AU - Neal, Kevin
AU - Pahys, Joshua
AU - Murphy, Josh
AU - Thiong, Jean Marc Mac
AU - Flynn, Jack
AU - Shufflebarger, Harry
AU - Miyanji, Firoz
AU - Clements, David
AU - Sucato, Daniel
AU - Hedequist, Daniel
AU - Hoernschmeyer, Dan
AU - Yilgor, Caglar
AU - Yaszay, Burt
AU - Roye, Benjamin
AU - Lonner, Baron
AU - Jain, Amit
AU - Samdani, Amer
AU - Alanay, Ahmet
AU - Buckland, Aaron
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Purpose: Nonselective fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in greater correction of the Lumbosacral Takeoff Angle (LSTOA); however, there are patients selectively fused that still have considerable change in their LSTOA. We sought to identify the relationship between preoperative LSTOA flexibility and postoperative correction of the LSTOA. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of Lenke 1–6, lumbar B and C modifier patients in the Harms Study Group with 2-year follow-up. Only patients with a lumbar Cobb angle ≥ 38 and ≤ 56 were included. The cases were divided into selective (SF: 177) and nonselective fusions (NSF: 324). Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative factors associated with postoperative LSTOA, and postoperative LSTOA correction in the NSF and SF groups. Results: The mean postoperative LSTOA correction was 6.1 ± 3.8, with 75 (15%) patients experiencing postoperative worsening of their LSTOA. Among other variables, larger LSTOA (p < 0.001) and smaller bending LSTOA correction (p < 0.001) were predictors of larger postoperative LSTOAs in both groups. Among other variables, larger LSTOA (p < 0.001), and larger bending LSTOA correction (p < 0.01) were predictors of greater LSOTA correction in both groups. Satisfactory LSTOA correction in the selective fusion group was associated with larger preoperative LSTOA (p < 0.001), larger bending LSTOA correction (p < 0.001), larger lumbar Cobb angle bending correction (p: 0.034), and smaller lumbar apex to LIV distance (p: 0.003). Conclusions: Preoperative static and bending LSTOA measurements may help surgeons decide between selective and non-selective fusion in patients with AIS.
AB - Purpose: Nonselective fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis results in greater correction of the Lumbosacral Takeoff Angle (LSTOA); however, there are patients selectively fused that still have considerable change in their LSTOA. We sought to identify the relationship between preoperative LSTOA flexibility and postoperative correction of the LSTOA. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of Lenke 1–6, lumbar B and C modifier patients in the Harms Study Group with 2-year follow-up. Only patients with a lumbar Cobb angle ≥ 38 and ≤ 56 were included. The cases were divided into selective (SF: 177) and nonselective fusions (NSF: 324). Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent preoperative factors associated with postoperative LSTOA, and postoperative LSTOA correction in the NSF and SF groups. Results: The mean postoperative LSTOA correction was 6.1 ± 3.8, with 75 (15%) patients experiencing postoperative worsening of their LSTOA. Among other variables, larger LSTOA (p < 0.001) and smaller bending LSTOA correction (p < 0.001) were predictors of larger postoperative LSTOAs in both groups. Among other variables, larger LSTOA (p < 0.001), and larger bending LSTOA correction (p < 0.01) were predictors of greater LSOTA correction in both groups. Satisfactory LSTOA correction in the selective fusion group was associated with larger preoperative LSTOA (p < 0.001), larger bending LSTOA correction (p < 0.001), larger lumbar Cobb angle bending correction (p: 0.034), and smaller lumbar apex to LIV distance (p: 0.003). Conclusions: Preoperative static and bending LSTOA measurements may help surgeons decide between selective and non-selective fusion in patients with AIS.
KW - Bending radiographs
KW - LSTOA
KW - Scoliosis
KW - Selective fusion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000829054
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000829054#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s43390-025-01063-6
DO - 10.1007/s43390-025-01063-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 40080260
AN - SCOPUS:105000829054
SN - 2212-134X
VL - 13
SP - 1169
EP - 1177
JO - Spine Deformity
JF - Spine Deformity
IS - 4
ER -