Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis

Adam E. Perlmutter, Can Talug, William F. Tarry, Stanley Zaslau, Hesam Mohseni, Stanley J. Kandzari

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    57 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objectives: To determine whether stone location affects the stone-free rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. Methods: From January 2002 to August 2006, 245 patients with 272 stones, ranging from 4 to 20 mm in size, underwent ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy at West Virginia University Hospital. The patients were followed up postoperatively with noncontrast spiral computed tomography, abdominal plain radiography, renal ultrasonography, or retrograde pyelography. Patients were considered to have been treated successfully if they had no residual stones. All pediatric patients were excluded, as were all patients with stones greater than 2 cm. Also, patients who had undergone previous shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, or URS by an outside urologist were excluded. Results: A total of 86 kidney stones were treated with URS and laser lithotripsy. Of these, 81 (94.2%) were successfully treated. Five patients (5.8%) had persistent stones. All 18 upper pole stones (100%) were cleared, 23 (95.8%) of 24 middle pole stones were cleared, and 40 (90.9%) of 44 lower pole stones were cleared (P = 0.338). Conclusions: URS is an important tool for treating nephroureterolithiasis with excellent success rates and minimal morbidity. The results of our study have shown that stone location does not significantly affect stone clearance rates when performing endoscopic lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)214-217
    Number of pages4
    JournalUrology
    Volume71
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2008

    Fingerprint

    Nephrolithiasis
    Lithotripsy
    Ureteroscopy
    Laser Lithotripsy
    Abdominal Radiography
    Kidney Calculi
    Urography
    Spiral Computed Tomography
    Calculi
    Ultrasonography
    Pediatrics
    Morbidity
    Kidney

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Urology

    Cite this

    Perlmutter, A. E., Talug, C., Tarry, W. F., Zaslau, S., Mohseni, H., & Kandzari, S. J. (2008). Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis. Urology, 71(2), 214-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023

    Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis. / Perlmutter, Adam E.; Talug, Can; Tarry, William F.; Zaslau, Stanley; Mohseni, Hesam; Kandzari, Stanley J.

    In: Urology, Vol. 71, No. 2, 02.2008, p. 214-217.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Perlmutter, AE, Talug, C, Tarry, WF, Zaslau, S, Mohseni, H & Kandzari, SJ 2008, 'Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis', Urology, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 214-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023
    Perlmutter AE, Talug C, Tarry WF, Zaslau S, Mohseni H, Kandzari SJ. Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis. Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):214-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023
    Perlmutter, Adam E. ; Talug, Can ; Tarry, William F. ; Zaslau, Stanley ; Mohseni, Hesam ; Kandzari, Stanley J. / Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis. In: Urology. 2008 ; Vol. 71, No. 2. pp. 214-217.
    @article{ac6238a6b081477c9562376224ff0fe5,
    title = "Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis",
    abstract = "Objectives: To determine whether stone location affects the stone-free rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. Methods: From January 2002 to August 2006, 245 patients with 272 stones, ranging from 4 to 20 mm in size, underwent ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy at West Virginia University Hospital. The patients were followed up postoperatively with noncontrast spiral computed tomography, abdominal plain radiography, renal ultrasonography, or retrograde pyelography. Patients were considered to have been treated successfully if they had no residual stones. All pediatric patients were excluded, as were all patients with stones greater than 2 cm. Also, patients who had undergone previous shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, or URS by an outside urologist were excluded. Results: A total of 86 kidney stones were treated with URS and laser lithotripsy. Of these, 81 (94.2{\%}) were successfully treated. Five patients (5.8{\%}) had persistent stones. All 18 upper pole stones (100{\%}) were cleared, 23 (95.8{\%}) of 24 middle pole stones were cleared, and 40 (90.9{\%}) of 44 lower pole stones were cleared (P = 0.338). Conclusions: URS is an important tool for treating nephroureterolithiasis with excellent success rates and minimal morbidity. The results of our study have shown that stone location does not significantly affect stone clearance rates when performing endoscopic lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi.",
    author = "Perlmutter, {Adam E.} and Can Talug and Tarry, {William F.} and Stanley Zaslau and Hesam Mohseni and Kandzari, {Stanley J.}",
    year = "2008",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "71",
    pages = "214--217",
    journal = "Urology",
    issn = "0090-4295",
    publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Impact of Stone Location on Success Rates of Endoscopic Lithotripsy for Nephrolithiasis

    AU - Perlmutter, Adam E.

    AU - Talug, Can

    AU - Tarry, William F.

    AU - Zaslau, Stanley

    AU - Mohseni, Hesam

    AU - Kandzari, Stanley J.

    PY - 2008/2

    Y1 - 2008/2

    N2 - Objectives: To determine whether stone location affects the stone-free rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. Methods: From January 2002 to August 2006, 245 patients with 272 stones, ranging from 4 to 20 mm in size, underwent ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy at West Virginia University Hospital. The patients were followed up postoperatively with noncontrast spiral computed tomography, abdominal plain radiography, renal ultrasonography, or retrograde pyelography. Patients were considered to have been treated successfully if they had no residual stones. All pediatric patients were excluded, as were all patients with stones greater than 2 cm. Also, patients who had undergone previous shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, or URS by an outside urologist were excluded. Results: A total of 86 kidney stones were treated with URS and laser lithotripsy. Of these, 81 (94.2%) were successfully treated. Five patients (5.8%) had persistent stones. All 18 upper pole stones (100%) were cleared, 23 (95.8%) of 24 middle pole stones were cleared, and 40 (90.9%) of 44 lower pole stones were cleared (P = 0.338). Conclusions: URS is an important tool for treating nephroureterolithiasis with excellent success rates and minimal morbidity. The results of our study have shown that stone location does not significantly affect stone clearance rates when performing endoscopic lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi.

    AB - Objectives: To determine whether stone location affects the stone-free rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. Methods: From January 2002 to August 2006, 245 patients with 272 stones, ranging from 4 to 20 mm in size, underwent ureteroscopy (URS) with laser lithotripsy at West Virginia University Hospital. The patients were followed up postoperatively with noncontrast spiral computed tomography, abdominal plain radiography, renal ultrasonography, or retrograde pyelography. Patients were considered to have been treated successfully if they had no residual stones. All pediatric patients were excluded, as were all patients with stones greater than 2 cm. Also, patients who had undergone previous shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, or URS by an outside urologist were excluded. Results: A total of 86 kidney stones were treated with URS and laser lithotripsy. Of these, 81 (94.2%) were successfully treated. Five patients (5.8%) had persistent stones. All 18 upper pole stones (100%) were cleared, 23 (95.8%) of 24 middle pole stones were cleared, and 40 (90.9%) of 44 lower pole stones were cleared (P = 0.338). Conclusions: URS is an important tool for treating nephroureterolithiasis with excellent success rates and minimal morbidity. The results of our study have shown that stone location does not significantly affect stone clearance rates when performing endoscopic lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39549092807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39549092807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023

    DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 18308086

    AN - SCOPUS:39549092807

    VL - 71

    SP - 214

    EP - 217

    JO - Urology

    JF - Urology

    SN - 0090-4295

    IS - 2

    ER -